Bibliography

  1. [AGL 99] AGLE B.R., MITCHELL R.K., “Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance and CEO Values”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 507–526, 1999.
  2. [AKE 70] AKERLOF G., The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Econcs, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 488–500, 1970.
  3. [ALE 13] ALEXY O., HENKEL J., WALLIN M., “From Closed to Open: Job Role Changes, Individual Predispositions, and the Adoption of Commercial Open Source Software Development”, Research Policy, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1325–1340, 2013.
  4. [ALL 05] ALLOUCHE J., LAROCHE P., “A meta-analytical examination of the link between corporate social and financial performance”, Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines, vol. 57, pp. 18–41, 2005.
  5. [AMA 08] AMAESHI K., OSUJI O., NNODIM P., “Corporate social responsibility in supply chains of global brands: a boundaryless responsibility? Clarifications, exceptions and implications”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 223–234, 2008.
  6. [AND 09] ANDERSEN M., SKJOETT-LARSEN T., “Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 75–86, 2009.
  7. [ARR 51] ARROW K.J., Social Choice and Individual Value, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1951.
  8. [ARR 54] ARROW K.J., DEBREU G., “Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy”, Econometrica, vol. 22, pp. 265–290, 1954.
  9. [ARR 62] ARROW K.J., “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing”, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 155–173, 1962.
  10. [ARR 63] ARROW K.J., “Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care”, American Economic Review, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 941–973, 1963.
  11. [ARR 73] ARROW K.J., “Social responsibility and economic efficiency”, Public Policy, vol. 21, pp. 303–317, 1973.
  12. [ART 89] ARTHUR W.B., “Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events”, Economic Journal, vol. 99, pp. 116–131, 1989.
  13. [AYU 06] AYUSO S., RODRÍGUEZ M.A., RICART J.E., “Responsible competitiveness at the ‘‘micro’’ level of the firm: Using stakeholder dialogue as a source for new ideas: A dynamic capability underlying sustainable innovation”, Corporate Governance, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 475–490, 2006.
  14. [BAN 07] BANERJEE S.B., Corporate Social Responsibility: The Good, the Bad, the Ugly, Edward Elgar, Northampton, 2007.
  15. [BAR 09] BAREGHEH B., ROWLEY J., SAMBROOK S., “Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation”, Management Decision, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1323–1339, 2009.
  16. [BEN 98] BENDHEIM C.L., WADDOCK S.A., GRAVES S.B., “Determining Best Practice in Corporate-Stakeholder Relations Using Data Envelopment Analysis”, Business and Society, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 306–339, 1998.
  17. [BER 32a] BERLE A.A., MEANS G., The Modern Corporation and the Private Property, MacMillan, New York, 1932.
  18. [BER 32b] BERLE A.A., “For Whom Corporate Managers are Trustees: a Note”, Harvard Law Review, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1365–1373, 1932.
  19. [BOG 11] BOGERS M., “The open innovation paradox: knowledge sharing and protection in R and D collaborations”, European Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 93–117, 2011.
  20. [BON 13] BONNAFOUS-BOUCHER M., DAHL RENDTORFF J., La théorie des parties prenantes, La Découverte, Paris, 2013.
  21. [BON 16] BONNEFON J.F., SHARIFF A., RAHWAN I., “The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles”, Science, vol. 352, no. 6293, pp. 1573–1576, 2016.
  22. [BOU 97] BOUJNAH S., QUERE M., “Les dirigeants et la responsabilité pénale de l’entreprise”, in PLOIX H. (ed.), Gouvernement d’entreprise, Corporate Governance: dimension juridique, méthode, responsabilités, Paris, AEF, 1997.
  23. [BOW 90] BOWIE N.E., DUSKA R., Business Ethics, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1990.
  24. [BOW 98] BOWIE N.E., Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 1998.
  25. [BUR 96] BURTON B.K., DUNN C.P., “Feminist Ethics as Moral Grounding for Stakeholder Theory”, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 133–147, 1996.
  26. [CAR 79] CARROLL A.B., “A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 497–505, 1979.
  27. [CAR 91] CARROLL A.B., “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Towards the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders”, Business Horizons, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 39–48, 1991.
  28. [CAR 02] CARTER C.R., JENNINGS M.M., “Social responsibility and supply chain relationships.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 37–52, 2002.
  29. [CAR 08a] CARROLL A.B., “A History of Corporate Social Responsibility, Concepts and Practices”, in CRANE A., MCWILLIAMS A., MATTEN D. et al. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008.
  30. [CAR 08b] CARTER C.R., ROGERS D.S., “A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 360–387, 2008.
  31. [CAR 10] CARROLL A.B., SHABANA K.M., “The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice”, International Journal of Management Review, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 85–105, 2010.
  32. [CAR 11] CARTAPANIS A., “La crise financière et la responsabilité des économistes”, Tracés. Revue de Sciences Humaines, vol. 11, pp. 149–161, 2011.
  33. [CEG 16] CEGARRA-NAVARRO J.-G., REVERTE C., GOMEZ-MELERO E. et al., “Linking social and economic responsibilities with financial performance: The role of innovation”, European Management Journal, vol. 34, pp. 530–539, 2016.
  34. [CHE 03] CHESBROUGH H., “Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology”, Harvard Business School Publishing, Cambridge, MA, 2003.
  35. [CHE 06] CHESBROUGH H., VANHAVERBEKE W., WEST J., Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006.
  36. [CHR 97] CHRISTENSEN C., The Innovator’s Dilemma, When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1997.
  37. [CIE 13] CIEPLEY D., “Beyond public and private: Toward a political theory of the Corporation”, American Political Science Review, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 139–158, 2013.
  38. [CLA 95] CLARKSON M.B.E., “A Stakeholder Framework for analysing and evaluating Corporate Social Performance”, Academy of Mangement Review, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 92–117, 1995.
  39. [CLA 99] CLARKSON CENTER FOR BUSINESS ETHICS, Principles of Stakeholder Management, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, 1999.
  40. [COA 37] COASE R., “The Nature of the Firm”, Economica, New Series, vol. 4, no. 16, pp. 386–405, 1937.
  41. [COL 05] COLONOMOS A., “La morale de la croyance dans les profits de la vertu”, Revue internationale des sciences sociales, vol. 3, no. 185, pp. 501–511, 2005.
  42. [CON 95] CONDORCET DE CARITAT M.-J.-A., Esquisse d'un tableau historique des progrès de l'esprit humain, Flammarion, Paris, 1795.
  43. [COO 01] COOPER S., CROWTHER D., DAVIES M. et al., Shareholder or stakeholder Value: The Development of Indicators for the Control and Measurement of Performance, The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, London, 2001.
  44. [CRA 14] CRANE A., PALAZZO G., SPENCE L.J. et al., “Contesting the Value of ‘Creating Shared Value”, California Management Review, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 130–153, 2014.
  45. [CRI 15] CRIFO P., FORGET V., “The economics of corporate social responsibility: A firm-level perspective survey”, Journal of Economic Surveys, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 112–130, 2015.
  46. [DAH 08] DAHLSRUD A., “How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2008.
  47. [DAO 13] DAOUD E., LE CORRE C., “La responsabilité pénale des personnes morales en droit de l’environnement,” Bulletin de Droit de l’environnement Industriel, vol. 44, pp. 53–58, 2013.
  48. [DAV 85] DAVID P.A., “Clio and the economics of QWERTY”, American Economic Review, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 332–337, 1985.
  49. [DEA 82] DEAL T.E., KENNEDY A.A., Corporate Cultures, the Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life, Addison–Wesley, Massachusetts, 1982.
  50. [DEE 95] DEEN G., Le dirigeant de Société. Statut juridique, social et fiscal, Litec, Paris, 1995.
  51. [DES 12] DESLANDES G., Le management éthique, Dunod, Paris, 2012.
  52. [DON 94] DONALDSON T., DUNFEE T.W., “Towards a Unified Conception of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 19, pp. 252–284, 1994.
  53. [DON 95] DONALDSON T., PRESTON L.E., “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 65–91, 1995.
  54. [DON 96] DONALDSON T., “Values in Tension: Ethics Away From Home”, Harvard Business Review, pp. 5–12, 1996.
  55. [DON 99a] DONALDSON T., DUNFEE T.W., Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1999.
  56. [DON 99b] DONALDSON T., “Making Stakeholder Theory whole”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 237–241, 1999.
  57. [DRI 13] DRIESSEN P.H., KOK R.A.W., HILLEBRAND B., “Mechanisms for stakeholder integration: Bringing virtual stakeholder dialogue into organizations”, Journal of Business Research, vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 1465–1472, 2013.
  58. [DUS 88] DUSKA R., “Whistleblowing and employee loyalty”, in BEAUCHAMP T.L., BOWIE N.E. (ed.), Ethical Theory and Business, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1988.
  59. [DUT 05] DUTTA D.K., CROSSAN M.M., “The nature of entrepreneurial opportunities: Understanding the process using the 4I organizational learning framework”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 29, pp. 425–449, 2005.
  60. [EEL 61] EELLS R., WALTON C., Conceptual Foundations of Business, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, 1961.
  61. [ENG 07] ENGSTER D., The Heart of Justice: Care Ethics and Political Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007.
  62. [EVA 88] EVAN W.M., FREEMAN R.E., “A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism”, in BEAUCHAMP T., BOWIE N. (eds), Ethical Theory and Business, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1988.
  63. [FER 11a] FERRELL O.C., FERRELL L., Ethical Decision Making for Business, 8th ed., Cengage Learning, South Western, 2011.
  64. [FER 11b] FERRELL O.C., FRAEDRICH J., FERRELL L., Business Ethics Ethical Decision Making and Cases, 8th ed., South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason, 2011.
  65. [FLI 03] FLICHY P., L’innovation Technique. Récents développements en sciences sociales. Vers une nouvelle théorie de l’innovation, La Découverte, Paris, 2003.
  66. [FOR 10] FORGET V.D., “A Survey of the Literature on CSR and Financial Performance”, in PONSSARD J.-P., CRIFO P. (eds), Corporate Social Responsibility: From Compliance to Opportunity, Editions de l’Ecole Polytechnique, Paris, 2010.
  67. [FOS 11] FOSS N.J., LAURSEN K., PEDERSEN T., “Linking Customer Interaction and Innovation: The Mediating Role of New Organizational Practices”, Organization Science, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 980–999, 2011.
  68. [FRE 84] FREEMAN R.E., Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Pitman Series in Business and Public Policy, Boston, 1984.
  69. [FRE 87] FREDERICK W.C., “Theories of Corporate Social Performance”, in SETHI S.P., FLABE C.M. (eds), Business and Society: Dimensions of Conflict and Cooperation, Lexington Books, New York, 1987.
  70. [FRE 90] FREEMAN R.E., EVAN W.M., “Corporate Governance: A Stakeholder Interpretation”, Journal of Behavioral Economics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 337–359, 1990.
  71. [FRE 94] FREEMAN R.E., “The politics of stakeholder theory”, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 409–421, 1994.
  72. [FRE 98] FREDERICK W.C., “Moving to CSR 4: What to Pack for the Trip”, Business and Society, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 40–60, 1998.
  73. [FRE 99] FREEMAN R.E., “Divergent Stakeholder Theory”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 233–236, 1999.
  74. [FRE 02] FREEMAN R.E., PHILIPS R.A., “Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defence”, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 331–349, 2002.
  75. [FRE 08] FREDERICK W.C., “Corporate social responsibility: deep roots, flourishing growth, promising future”, in CRANE A., MCWILLIAMS A., MATTEN D. et al. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008.
  76. [FRE 10] FREEMAN R.E., HARRISON J.S., WICKS A.C. et al., Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.
  77. [FRE 60] FREDERICK W.C., “The Growing Concern Over Business Responsibility”, Management Review, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 54–61, 1960.
  78. [FRI 70] FRIEDMAN M., “The responsability of business is to increase its profits”, New York Times Magazine, vol. 33, pp. 122–126, 13 September 1970.
  79. [FRO 97] FROOMAN J., “Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth: a metaanalysis of event studies”, Business and Society, vol. 36, pp. 221–249, 1997.
  80. [GAR 04] GARRIGA E., MELÉ D., “Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 53, nos. 1–2, pp. 51–71, 2004.
  81. [GOO 83] GOODPASTER K.E., “The Concept of Corporate Responsibility”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 2, pp. 1–22, 1983.
  82. [GOU 12] GOULD R.W., “Open Innovation and Stakeholder Engagement”, Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1–11, 2012.
  83. [GRI 97] GRIFFIN J.J., MAHON J.F., “The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: twenty-five years of incomparable research”, Business and Society, vol. 36, pp. 5–31, 1997.
  84. [GRO 11] GROVES C., FRATER L., LEE R. et al., “Is There Room at the Bottom for CSR? Corporate Social Responsibility and Nanotechnology in the UK”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 101, pp. 525–552, 2011.
  85. [GRO 14] GROOT A., DANKBAAR B., “Does Social Innovation Require Social Entrepreneurship?”, Technology Innovation Management Review, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 17–26, 2014.
  86. [HAM 11] HAMINGTON M., SANDER-STAUDT M., “Introduction: Care ethics and Business Ethics”, in HAMINGTON M., SANDER-STAUDT M. (eds), Applying Care Ethics to Business, Issues in business Ethics, vol. 34, Springer, Berlin, 2011.
  87. [HAR 07] HARRIBEY J.-M., “Les théories de la décroissance: enjeux et limites”, Cahiers français, “Développement et environnement”, vol. 337, pp. 20–26, 2007.
  88. [HEL 93] HELD V., Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society, and Politics, Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1993.
  89. [HEL 06] HELD V., The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006.
  90. [HIL 04] HILLIER J., MOULAERT F., NUSSBAUMER J., “Trois essais sur le rôle de l’innovation sociale dans le développement territorial”, Géographie, Economie et Société, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 129–152, 2004.
  91. [HIR 95] HIRSCHMAN A.O., Un certain penchant à l’autosubversion. Essais, Fayard, Paris, 1995.
  92. [HOC 09] HOCHGERNER J., “Innovation process in the dynamics of social change”, in LOUDIN J., SCHUCH K. (eds), Innovation Cultures. Challenge and Learning Strategy, Filosofia, Prague, 2009.
  93. [HOY 10] HOYER W.D., CHANDY R., DOROTIC M. et al., “Consumer cocreation in new product development”, Journal of Service Research, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 283–296, 2010.
  94. [HSI 12] HSIAO R.L., TSAI D.H., LEE C.F., “Collaborative knowing: The adaptive nature of cross-boundary spanning”, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 463–491, 2012.
  95. [JEN 76] JENSEN M.C., MECKLING W., “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost, and Capital Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 3, pp. 305–360, 1976.
  96. [JEN 00] JENSEN M.C., Theory of the Firm: Governance, Residual Claims, and Organizational Forms, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
  97. [JEN 02] JENSEN M.C., “Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function”, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 235–256, 2002.
  98. [JON 71] JOHNSON H.L., Business in Contemporary Society: Framework and Issues, Wadsworth Pub. Co., Belmont, California, 1971.
  99. [JON 80] JONES T., “Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited, Redefined”, California Management Review, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 59–67, 1980.
  100. [JON 95] JONES T., “Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: a synthesis of Ethics and Economics”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, pp. 404–437, 1995.
  101. [KEL 67] KELSEN H., Pure Theory of Law, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1967.
  102. [KEY 31] KEYNES J.-M., Essais sur la monnaie et l'économie, Payot, Paris, 1931.
  103. [KEY 98] KEY S., POPKIN S.J., “Integrating ethics into the strategic management process: doing well by doing good”, Management Decision, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 331–338, 1998.
  104. [KIT 01] KITTAY E.F., “When Care is Just and Justice is Caring: The Case of the Care for the Mentally Retarded”, Public Culture, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 557–579, 2001.
  105. [KLA 12] KLASSEN R.D., VEREECKE A., “Social issues in supply chains: Capabilities link responsibility, risk (opportunity), and performance”, International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 103–115, 2012.
  106. [KLE 99] KLEIN N., No Logo, Knopf Canada and Picador, Toronto, 1999.
  107. [KOC 00] KOCHAN A.T., RUBINSTEIN S., “Toward a Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: The Saturn Partnership”, Organization Science, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 367–386, 2000.
  108. [KOH 63] KOHLBERG L., “The development of children’s orientations toward a moral order: I. Sequence in the development of moral thought”, Vita Humana, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–33, 1963.
  109. [KOH 69] KOHLBERG L., “Stage and sequence: the cognitive-developmental approach to socialization”, in GOSLIN D.A. (ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, Rand McNally College Publishing Company, Chicago, 1969.
  110. [KOH 90] KOHLBERG L., RYNCARZ R.A., “Beyond justice reasoning: Moral development and consideration of a seventh stage”, in ALEXANDER C.N., LANGER E.J. (eds), Higher Stages of Human Development, Oxford University Press, New York, 1990.
  111. [KOT 05] KOTLER P., LEE N., Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing tthe Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause, Wiley, New Jersey, 2005.
  112. [KOT 12] KOTLER L., “Saint-Gobain Distribution Batiment, reconfiguration d’une supply-chain en chaîne de valeur”, in PLUCHART J.J., UZAN O. (eds), Management des organisations et Responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise, Eska, Paris, 2012.
  113. [KUH 62] KUHN T., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1962.
  114. [KUZ 11a] KUZMA J., KUZHABEKOVA A., “Corporate social responsibility for nanotechnology oversight”, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, vol. 14, pp. 407–419, 2011.
  115. [KUZ 11b] KUZMA J., KUZHABEKOVA A., “Nanotechnology, voluntary oversight, and corporate social performance: Does company size matter?”, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 13, pp. 1499–1512, 2011.
  116. [LAD 70] LADD J., “Morality and the ideal of rationality in formal organizations”, The Monist, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 488–516, 1970.
  117. [LAM 16] LAMPERT M., “Corporate social responsibility and the supposed moral agency of corporations”, Ephemera, Theory & Politics in Organizations, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 79–105, 2016.
  118. [LAN 94] LANGTRY B., “Stakeholders and the Moral Responsibilities of Business”, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 431–443, 1994.
  119. [LAK 03] LAKHANI K.R., VON HIPPEL E., “How open source software works: ‘Free’ user-to-user assistance”, Research Policy, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 923–943, 2003.
  120. [LEE 08] LEE, M.D.P., “A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead”, International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 10, pp. 53–73, 2008.
  121. [LI 15] LI F., OWEN R., SIMAKOVA E., “Framing responsible innovation in synthetic biology: the need for a critical discourse analysis approach”, Journal of Responsible Innovation, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 104–108, 2015.
  122. [LOV 08] LOVERIDGE D., DEWICK P., RANDLES S., “Converging technologies at the nanoscale: The making of a new world?”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 29–43, 2008.
  123. [LYO 08] LYON T.P., MAXWELL J.W., “Corporate social responsibility and the environment: A theoretical perspective”, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, vol. 1, pp. 1–22, 2008.
  124. [MAC 99] MACINTYRE A., Dependant Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues, Duckworth, London, 1999.
  125. [MAH 14] MAHR D., LIEVENS A., BLAZEVIC V., “The value of customer cocreated knowledge during the innovation process”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 599–615, 2014.
  126. [MAI 03] MAIO E., “Managing brand in the new stakeholder environment”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 44, pp. 235–246, 2003.
  127. [MAL 11] MALIK K., GEORGHIOU L., GRIEVE B., “Developing new technology platforms for new business models: Syngenta’s partnership with the University of Manchester,” Research Technology Management, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 24–31, 2011.
  128. [MAR 01] MARGOLIS J.D., WALSH J.P., People and Profits? The Search for a Link between a Company’s Social and Financial Performance, Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Mahwah, 2001.
  129. [MAR 03] MARGOLIS J.D., WALSH J.P., “Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 48, pp. 268–305, 2003.
  130. [MAR 07] MARGOLIS J.D., ELFENBEIN H.A., WALSH J.P., Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance, Working paper, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, 2007.
  131. [MAT 05] MATTEN D., CRANE A., “Corporate Citizenship: Towards an Extended Theoretical Conceptualization”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 166–179, 2005.
  132. [MEL 08] MELÉ D., “Corporate Social Responsibility Theories”, in CRANE A., MATTEN D., MCWILLIAMS A. et al. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, Oxford university Press, Oxford, 2008.
  133. [MEN 11] MENISSIER T., “Philosophie et innovation, ou philosophie de l’innovation?”, Klesis – Revue philosophique, vol. 18, pp. 10–27, 2011.
  134. [MET 98] METCALFE C., “The stakeholder corporation”, Business Ethics: A European Review, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 30–36, 1998.
  135. [MIL 08] MILLINGTON A., “Responsibility in the supply chain”, in CRANE A., MATTEN D., MCWILLIAMS A. et al. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008.
  136. [MIT 97] MITCHELL R.K., AGLE B.R., WOOD D.J., “Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 853–886, 1997.
  137. [MOU 13] MOULAERT F., MACCALLUM D., MEHMOOD A. et al., “General introduction: the return of social innovation as a scientific concept and a social practice”, in MOULAERT F., MACCALLUM D., MEHMOOD A. et al. (eds), The International Handbook for Social Innovation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2013.
  138. [MUL 07] MULLENBACH-SERVAYRE A., “L'apport de la théorie des parties prenantes à la Modélisation de la responsabilité sociétale des Entreprises”, La Revue des Sciences de Gestion, vol. 1, no. 223, pp. 109–120, 2007.
  139. [NAG 16] NAGY D., SCHUESSLER J., DUBINSKY A., “Defining and identifying disruptive innovations”, Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 57, pp. 119–126, 2016.
  140. [NEV 06] NEVILLE B.A., MENGUC B., “Stakeholder Multiplicity: Toward an Understanding of the Interactions between Stakeholders”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 66, pp. 377–391, 2006.
  141. [NOD 84a] NODDING N., SHORE P. Awakening the Inner Eye: Intuition in Education, NY Teachers College Press, New York, 1984.
  142. [NOD 84b] NODDINGS N., Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1984.
  143. [NUS 93] NUSSBAUM M.C., “Non Relative Virtues: An Aristotelian Approach”, in SEN A., NUSSBAUM M. (eds), The Quality of Life, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993.
  144. [NUS 99] NUSSBAUM M.C., “Virtue ethics: A misleading category?”, Journal of Ethics, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 163–201, 1999.
  145. [OEC 14] OECD, Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2014, OECD Publishing, available at: http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/science-and-technology/oecd-science-technology-and-industry-outlook-2014_sti_outlook-2014-en#page1, 2014.
  146. [OGD 99] OGDEN S., WATSON R., “Corporate Performance and Stakeholder Management: Balancing Shareholder and Customer Interests in the U.K. Privatized Water Industry”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 526–538, 1999.
  147. [ORL 03] ORLITZKI M., SCHMIDT F.-L., RYNES S.-L., “Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis”, Organizational Studies, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 403–441, 2003.
  148. [OSU 08] O’SULLIVAN D., DOOLEY L., Applying Innovation, SAGE Publications, California, 2008.
  149. [PAV 14a] PAVIE X., “The Importance of Responsible-Innovation and the Necessity of ‘Innovation-Care’”, Philosophy of Management, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 21–42, 2014.
  150. [PAV 14b] PAVIE X., EGAL J., “Innovation and Responsibility: A Managerial Approach to the Integration of Responsibility in a Disruptive Innovation Model,” in VAN DEN HOVEN J., KOOPS E.J., ROMIJN H.A. et al. (eds), Responsible Innovation 1: Innovative Solutions for Global Issues, Springer, Dordrecht, 2014.
  151. [PEL 16a] PELLÉ S., REBER B., From Ethical Review to Responsible Research and Innovation, ISTE Ltd, London and John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2016.
  152. [PEL 16b] PELLÉ S., “Process, outcomes, virtues: the normative strategies of responsible research and innovation and the challenge of moral pluralism”, Journal of Responsible Innovation, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 233–254, 2016.
  153. [PHI 97] PHILLIPS R.A., “Stakeholder Theory and a Principle of Fairness”, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 51–66, 1997.
  154. [PHI 00] PHILLIPS R.A., REICHART J., “The environment as a stakeholder? A fairness-based approach”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 185–197, 2000.
  155. [PHI 03a] PHILLIPS R.A., “Stakeholder Legitimacy”, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 25–41, 2003.
  156. [PHI 03b] PHILLIPS R.A., FREEMAN E., WICKS A.C., “What Stakeholder Theory Is Not”, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 479–502, 2003.
  157. [PLA 09] PLAZA-ÚBEDA J.A., BURGOS-JIMÉNEZ J.J., VAZQUEZ D.A. et al., “The ‘win–win’ paradigm and stakeholder integration”, Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 487–499, 2009.
  158. [POS 02] POST J.E., PRESTON L.E., SACHS S., “Managing the Extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View”, California Management Review, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 6–28, 2002.
  159. [POR 80] PORTER M., Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, Free Press, New York, 1980.
  160. [POR 95] PORTER M., VAN DER LINDEN C., “Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship”, Journal of Economic Perspective, vol. 9, pp. 97–118, 1995.
  161. [PRA 02a] PRAHALAD C.K., “Strategies for the Bottom of the Economic Pyramid: India as a Source of Innovation”, Reflections: The SOL Journal, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 6–18, 2002.
  162. [PRA 02b] PRAHALAD C.K., HAMMOND A., “Serving the World’s Poor, Profitably”, Harvard Business Review, vol. 80, no. 9, pp. 48–58, 2002.
  163. [PRE 81] PRESTON L.E., POST J.E., “Private Management and Public Policy”, California Management Review, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 56–62, 1981.
  164. [RAM 10] RAMASWAMY V., GOUILLART F., “Building the co-creative enterprise”, Harvard Business Review, vol. 88, no. 10, pp. 100–109, 2010.
  165. [REY 06] REYNOLDS S., SCHULTZ F., HEKMAN D., “Stakeholder theory and managerial decision making: Constraints and implications of balancing stakeholder interests”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 285–301, 2006.
  166. [REI 08] REINHARDT F.L., STAVINS R.N., VIETOR R.H.K., “Corporate Social Responsibility Through an Economic Lens”, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 219–239, 2008.
  167. [REY 16] REYPENS C., LIEVENS A., BLAZEVIC V., “Leveraging value in multi-stakeholder innovation networks: A process framework for value co-creation and capture”, Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 56, pp. 40–50, 2016.
  168. [ROB 09] ROBE J.-P., “Responsabilité limitée des actionnaires et Responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise”, ESKA, Entreprises et histoire, vol. 4, no. 57, pp. 165–183, 2009.
  169. [ROH 10] ROHRBECK R., “Harnessing a network of experts for competitive advantage: technology scouting in the ICT industry”, R and D Management, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 169–180, 2010.
  170. [ROM 99] ROMAN R.M., HAYIBOR S., AGLE B.R., “The relationship between social and financial performance”, Business & Society, vol. 38, p. 109, 1999.
  171. [ROU 11] ROUSSEAU S., TCHOTOURIAN I., “Normativité et RSE. L’illustration d’une construction Polysémique du droit de part et d’autre de l’atlantique”, in TREBULLE F.G., UZAN O. (eds), Responsabilité sociale des entreprises. Regards croisés Droits et Gestion, Economica, Paris, 2011.
  172. [RUD 80] RUDDICK S., “Maternal Thinking”, Feminist Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 342–367, 1980.
  173. [SAM 47] SAMUELSON P., The Foundations of Economic Analysis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1947.
  174. [SAM 71] SAMUELSON P., “Love that corporation”, Mountain Bell Magazine, 1971.
  175. [SCH 03] SCHWARTZ M.S., CARROLL A.B., “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach”, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 503–530, 2003.
  176. [SCH 15] SCHROEDER D., LADIKAS M., “Towards Principled Responsible Research and Innovation: Employing the Difference Principle in Funding Decisions”, Journal of Responsible Innovation, vol.2, no. 2, pp. 169–183, 2015.
  177. [SCH 34] SCHUMPETER J.A., The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle, Transaction Publishers, 1934.
  178. [SEN 77] SEN A.K., “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 317–344, 1977.
  179. [SEN 85] SEN A.K., ‘‘Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984”, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 169–221, 1985.
  180. [SEN 01] SEN S., BHATTACHARYA C.B., “Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility”, Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 38, pp. 225–243, 2001.
  181. [SEN 06] SEN S., BHATTACHARYA C.B., KORSCHUN D., “The role of Corporate Social Responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 158–66, 2006.
  182. [SET 75] SETHI S.P., “Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical Framework”, California Management Review, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 58–65, 1975.
  183. [SHA 05] SHARMA S., “Through the lens of managerial interpretations: Stakeholder engagement, organizational knowledge and innovation”, in SHARMA S., ARAGÓN-CORREA J.A. (eds), Environmental Strategy and Competitive Advantage, Edward Elgar Academic Publishing, Northampton, 2005.
  184. [SHA 11] SHAW W.H., Business Ethics.A Textbook with Cases, 7th ed., Wadswoth, Boston, 2011.
  185. [SHU 73] SCHUMAKER E.F., Small is Beautiful. Economics as if People Mattered, Blond & Briggs Ltd., London, 1973.
  186. [SIM 55] SIMON H.A., “A behavioral model of rational choice”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 99–118, 1955.
  187. [SMI 76] SMITH A., Recherche sur la nature et les causes de la richesse des nations, Flammarion, Paris, 1776.
  188. [SIM 79] SIMON H.A., “Rational decision making in business organizations”, American Economic Review, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 493–513, 1979.
  189. [SOL 57] SOLLOW R., “Technical change and the Aggregate Production Function”, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 312–320, 1957.
  190. [SOL 93] SOLOMON R., Ethics and Excellence. Cooperation and Integrity in Business, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993.
  191. [SOL 03] SOLOMON R., Not Passion's Slave: Emotions and Choice, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003.
  192. [STA 95] STARIK M., “Should trees have managerial standing? Toward stakeholder status for non-human nature”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 14, pp. 207–217, 1995.
  193. [STE 71] STEINER G.A., Business and Society, Random House, New York, 1971.
  194. [STI 16] STILGOE J., “Geoengineering as Collective Experimentation”, Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 851–869, 2016.
  195. [TAG 02] TAGUIEFF P.-A., “L’idée de progrès, Une approche historique et philosophique”, Cahier du CEVIPOF, vol. 32, no. 2, 2002.
  196. [TRI 11] TRICOT-CHAMARD I., ESTAY C., “Quand la responsabilité juridique vient enrichir la responsabilité sociale des entreprises”, Gestion 2000, vol. 5, no. 28, pp. 83–100, 2011.
  197. [TRO 13] TRONTO J., Caring Democracy, Market, Equality and Justice, NY University Press, New York, 2013.
  198. [TUB 15] TUBIANA J., La saga Danone, son projet économique et social à l’épreuve des faits, JCLattès, Paris, 2015.
  199. [VAN 06] VANHAVERBEKE W., “The inter-organizational context of open innovation”, in CHESBROUGH H., VANHAVERBEKE W., WEST J. (eds.), Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, New York, 2006.
  200. [VAN 14] VAN DEN HOVEN J., “Responsible Innovation: A New Look at Technology and Ethics”, in VAN DEN HOVEN J., KOOPS E.J., ROMIJN H.A. et al. (eds), Responsible Innovation vol. 1. Innovative Solutions for Global Issues, Springer, Dordrecht, 2014.
  201. [VOG 05a] VOGEL D., The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, 2005.
  202. [VOG 05b] VOGEL D., “Is There a Market for Virtue? The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility”, California Management Review, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 19–45, 2005.
  203. [VOG 08] VOGEL D., “CSR Doesn't Pay”, Forbes, available online, 10/16/2008.
  204. [VON 13] VON SCHOMBERG R., “Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation”, in OWEN R., BESSANT J., HEINTZ M. (eds), Responsible Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2013.
  205. [VOT 72] VOTAW D., “Genius Became Rare: A Comment on the Doctrine of Social Responsibility, Pt 1”, California Management Review, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 25–31, 1972.
  206. [WAD 97] WADDOCK S.A., GRAVES S.B., “The corporate social performance-financial performance link”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, pp. 303–319, 1997.
  207. [WAL 08] WALKER H., PREUSS L., “Fostering sustainability through sourcing from small businesses: public sector perspectives”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 16, no. 15, pp. 1600–1609, 2008.
  208. [WEI 12] WEISENFELD U., “Corporate Social Responsibility In Innovation: Insights From Two Cases Of Syngenta’s Activities In Genetically Modified Organisms”, Corporate Social Creativity And Innovation Management, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 199–211, 2012.
  209. [WER 85] WERHANE P.H., Persons, rights, and corporations, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1985.
  210. [WES 96] WEST M.A., ANDERSON N.R., “Innovation in top management teams”, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 81, pp. 680–693, 1996.
  211. [WIC 94] WICKS A.C., GILBERT D.R., FREEMAN R.E., “A Feminist Reinterpretation of the Stakeholder Concept”, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 475–497, 1994.
  212. [WIL 14] WILBURN K., WILBURN R., “Demonstrating a Commitment to Corporate Social Responsibility Not Simply Shared Value”, Business and Professional Ethics Journal, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2014.
  213. [WIL 75] WILLIAMSON O.E., Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, Free Press, New York, 1975.
  214. [WIL 85] WILLIAMSON O.E., The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, Free Press, New York, 1985.
  215. [WIJ 00] WIJNBERG N.M., “Normative Stakeholder Theory and Aristotle: The Link between Ethics and Politics”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 25, pp. 329–342, 2000.
  216. [WOO 02] WOOD D.J., LODGSON J.M., “Business Citizenship: From Individuals to Organizations”, Business Ethics Quarterly, Ruffin Series, vol. 3, pp. 59–94, 2002.
  217. [WYN 92]WYNNE B., “Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm”, Global Environmental Change, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 111–127, 1992.
  218. [ZIE 15] ZIEGLER R., “Justice and Innovation–Towards Principles for Creating a Fair Space for Innovation”, Journal of Responsible Innovation, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 184–200, 2015.
..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset