References
ATC, 1978. Tentative provisions for the development of seismic design regulations of buildings. Report ATC 3-06, Applied Technology Council.
Baban SMJ. Managing Geo-Based Challenges: World-Wide Case Studies and Sustainable Local Solutions. Cham: Springer; 2014: .
Baer EM. Teaching quantitative concepts in floods and flooding. Northfield, MN: Science Education Resource Center at Carlton College (SERC); 2007.
Baker JW. An Introduction to Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA), White Paper, Version 1.3. California: Stanford University; 2008.
Beven KJ, Aspinall WP, Bates PD, Borgomeo E, Goda K, Hall JW, Page T, Phillips JC, Rougier JT, Simpson M, Stephenson DB, Smith PJ, Wagener T, Watson M. Epistemic uncertainties and natural hazard risk assessment—Part: 1 A review of the issues. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2015;3:7333.
Bommer J. Deterministic vs. probabilistic seismic hazard assessment: an exaggerated and obstructive dichotomy. J. Earthquake Eng. 2002;6:43.
Campedel M, Cozzani V, Garcia-Agreda A, Salzano E. Extending the quantitative assessment of industrial risks to earthquake effects. Risk Anal. 2008;28:1231.
CEN, 2004. Eurocode 8 Design of Structures for earthquake resistance, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
Cornell CA. Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 1968;58:1583.
de Moel H, van Alphen J, Aerts JCJH. Flood maps in Europe—methods, availability and use. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2009;9:289.
ESPON, 2006. The Spatial Effects and Management of Natural and Technological Hazards in Europe—ESPON 1.3.1, European Spatial Planning Observation Network. www.espon.eu
European Union. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Off. J. Eur. Commun. 2000; .
European Union. Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks. Off. J. Eur. Union. 2007; .
Geist EL, Lynett JP. Source processes for the probabilistic assessment of tsunami hazards. Oceanography. 2014;27:86–93.
IAEA, 2003. Seismic Design & Qualification for Nuclear Power Plants - Safety Guide, Safety Standards Series No. NS-G-1.6, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.
IPCC, 2007. In: Pachauri, R.K., Reisinger, A. (Eds.), “Climate Change 2007 Synthesis Report” Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland.
ISO, 2000. ISO 15686-1 Buildings and constructed assets—service life planning—Part 1 General principles, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
Koshimura S, Oie T, Yanagisawa H, Imamura F. Developing fragility functions for Tsunami270 damage estimation using numerical model and post-tsunami data from Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Coastal Eng. J. 2009;51:243.
Kramer SL. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1996.
Krausmann E, Cozzani V, Salzano E, Renni E. Industrial accidents triggered by natural hazards: an emerging risk issue. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2011;11:921.
Krausmann E, Cruz AM, Affeltranger B. The impact of the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake on industrial facilities. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2010;23:242.
Lanzano G, Salzano E, Santucci de Magistris F, Fabbrocino G. Seismic vulnerability of natural gas pipelines. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2013;117:73.
Lanzano G, Salzano E, Santucci de Magistris F, Fabbrocino G. Seismic vulnerability of gas and liquid buried pipelines. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2014;28:72.
Lanzano G, Santucci de Magistris F, Fabbrocino G, Salzano E. Seismic damage to pipelines in the framework of Natech risk assessment. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2015;33:159.
Lanzano G, Santucci de Magistris F, Salzano E, Fabbrocino G. Vulnerability of industrial components to soil liquefaction. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2014;36:421.
Lorito S, Selva J, Basili R, Romano F, Tiberti MM, Piatanesi A. Probabilistic hazard for seismically induced tsunamis: accuracy and feasibility of inundation maps. Geophys. J. Int. 2015;2001:574.
Luco, N., Ellingwood, B.R., Hamburger, R.O., Hooper, J.D., Kimball, J.K., Kircher, C.A., 2007. Risk-targeted versus current seismic design maps for the conterminous United States. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Convention of the Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC).
Mas E, Koshimura S, Suppasri A, Matsuoka M, Matsuyama M, Yoshii T, Jimenez C, Yamazaki F, Imamura F. Developing Tsunami fragility curves using remote sensing and survey data of the 2010 Chilean Tsunami in Dichato. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2012;12:2689.
NBCC National Building Code of Canada. Ottawa, Canada: Institute for Research Construction, National Research Council of Canada; 2005.
NEHRP, 2003. NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures—Part I Provisions, US Federal Emergency Management Authority, Washington, DC.
NEHRP, 2009. NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures. Part I—Provisions, US Federal Emergency Management Authority, Washington, DC.
Nelson SA. Flooding Hazards, Prediction & Human Intervention. New Orleans, USA: Tulane University, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences; 2015 http://www.tulane.edu/∼sanelson/Natural_Disasters/floodhaz.htm.
Nelson SA. Tsunami. New Orleans, USA.: Tulane University, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences; 2012 http://www.tulane.edu/∼sanelson/Natural_Disasters/tsunami.htm.
NTC, 2008. Italian Building Code, DM 14, 2008.
OPCM, 2003. Ordinanza del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri n. 3274 del 20 marzo 2003, Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica italiana n.105 dell’8 maggio 2003, Primi elementi in materia di criteri generali per la classificazione sismica del territorio nazionale e di normative tecniche per le costruzioni in zona sismica.
Panico, A., Basco, A., Lanzano, G., Pirozzi, F., Santucci de Magistris, F., Fabbrocino, G., Salzano, E., 2016. Evaluating the structural priorities for the seismic vulnerability of civilian and industrial wastewater treatment plants, Saf. Sci., in press.
Pellegrino, A.M., Scotto di Santolo, A., Evangelista, A., Coussot, P., 2010. Rheological behaviour of pyroclastic debris flow. Third International Conference on Monitoring, Simulation, Prevention and Remediation of Dense and Debris Flow “Debris Flow III,” May 24–26, Milan, Italy.
Pellegrino AM, Scotto di Santolo A, Schippa L. An integrated procedure to evaluate rheological parameters to model debris flows. Eng. Geol. 2015;196:88.
PGEC Methodology for probabilistic tsunami hazard analysis: trial application for the Diablo Canyon Power Plant Site. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Gas & Electric Company; 2010.
Rikitake T, Aida I. Tsunami hazard probability in Japan. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 1988;78:1268.
Salzano E, Basco A, Busini V, Cozzani V, Renni E, Rota R. Public awareness promoting new or emerging risk: industrial accidents triggered by natural hazards. J. Risk Res. 2013;16:469.
Salzano E, Garcia-Agreda A, Di Carluccio A, Fabbrocino G. Risk assessment and early warning systems for industrial facilities in seismic zones. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2009;94:1577.
Salzano E, Iervolino I, Fabbrocino G. Seismic risk of atmospheric storage tanks in the framework of quantitative risk analysis. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2003;16:403.
Suppasri A, Mas E, Charvet I, Gunasekera R, Imai K, Fukutani Y, Abe Y, Imamura F. Building damage characteristics based on surveyed data and fragility curves of the 2011 Great East Japan Tsunami. Nat. Hazards. 2013;66:319.
Thio HK, Somerville P, Polet J. Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard in California. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, PEER Report 2010/108. Berkeley, CA: University of California; 2010.