References
Antonioni G, Bonvicini S, Spadoni G, Cozzani V. Development of a framework for the risk assessment of Natech accidental events. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2009;94:1442–1450.
Antonioni G, Spadoni G, Cozzani V. A methodology for the quantitative risk assessment of major accidents triggered by seismic events. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007;147:48–50.
Campedel M, Cozzani V, Garcia-Agreda A, Salzano E. Extending the quantitative assessment of industrial risks to earthquake effects. Risk Anal. 2008;28(5):1231–1246.
CCPS Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis. second ed. New York: Center for Chemical Process Safety/American Institute of Chemical Engineers; 2000.
Christou MD, Introduction to risk concepts. Kirchsteiger C, Christou MD, Papadakis GA, eds. Risk Assessment and Management in the Context of the Seveso II Directive, Industrial Safety Series, vol. 6. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1998.
Christou MD, Consequence analysis and modelling. Kirchsteiger C, Christou MD, Papadakis GA, eds. Risk Assessment and Management in the Context of the Seveso II Directive, Industrial Safety Series, vol. 6. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1998.
Cox T, Risk integration and decision making. Kirchsteiger D, Christou MD, Papadakis GA, eds. Risk Assessment and Management in the Context of the Seveso II Directive, Industrial Safety Series, vol. 6. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1998.
Cozzani V, Campedel M, Renni E, Krausmann E. Industrial accidents triggered by flood events: analysis of past accidents. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010;175:501.
Cozzani V, Krausmann E, Reniers G. Other causes of escalation. In: Reniers G, Cozzani V, eds. Domino Effects in the Process Industries. Waltham, MA: Elsevier; 2013.
Cozzani V, Gubinelli G, Antonioni G, Spadoni G, Zanelli S. The assessment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005;127:14.
Cozzani V, Gubinelli G, Salzano E. Escalation thresholds in the assessment of domino accidental events. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006;129(1–3):1–21.
Cruz AM, Okada N. Consideration of natural hazards in the design and risk management of chemical industrial facilities. Nat. Hazard. 2008;44(2):213–227.
Delvosalle, C., Fievez, C., Pipart, A., 2004. ARAMIS: accidental risk assessment methodology for industries in the context of the Seveso II Directive. ARAMIS project deliverable D.1.C., July 2004.
Di Carluccio, A., Iervolino, I., Manfredi, G., Fabbrocino, G., Salzano, E., 2006. Quantitative probabilistic seismic risk analysis of storage facilities. In: Proc. CISAP-2, Chem. Eng. Trans. 9.
Duijm, N.J., 2009. Acceptance criteria in Denmark and the EU. Danish Ministry of the Environment, Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Project No. 1269.
Fabbrocino G, Iervolino I, Orlando F, Salzano E. Quantitative risk analysis of oil storage facilities in seismic areas. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005;A123:61–69.
FEMA, 2003. Multi-hazard Loss Estimation Methodology, Earthquake Model, HAZUS®MH MR4, Technical Manual, US Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C.
Finney DJ. Probit Analysis. UK: Cambridge University Press; 1971.
HSE, 2001. Reducing risks, protecting people—HSE’s decision-making process. Health and Safety Executive, United Kingdom.
HSE, 2009. Societal risk: initial briefing to Societal Risk Technical Advisory Group. Research Report RR703, Health and Safety Executive, United Kingdom.
Ibrahim RA. Liquid Sloshing Dynamics: Theory and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
Khan FI, Abbasi SA. Models for domino effect analysis in chemical process industries. Process Saf. Prog. 1998;17:107.
Khan FI, Abbasi SA. An assessment of the likelihood of occurrence, and the damage potential of domino effect (chain of accidents) in a typical cluster of industries. J. Loss Prevent. Proc. Indus. 2001;14(4):283.
Kiremidjian, A., Ortiz, K., Nielsen, R., Safavi, B., 1985. Seismic risk to industrial facilities. Report No. 72, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University.
Krausmann, E., 2016. Natech accidents—an overlooked type of risk? Loss Prev. Bull. 251, October 2016, Institution of Chemical Engineers, United Kingdom.
Krausmann E, Cozzani V, Salzano E, Renni E. Industrial accidents triggered by natural hazards: an emerging risk issue. Nat. Hazard. Earth Syst. Sci. 2011;11:921–929.
Krausmann E, Renni E, Campedel M, Cozzani V. Industrial accidents triggered by earthquakes, floods and lightning: lessons learned from a database analysis. Nat. Hazard. 2011;59/1:285–300.
Mecklenburgh, J.C. (Ed.), 1985. Process plant layout, Goodwin in association with the Institution of Chemical Engineers.
Reniers G, Cozzani V, eds. Domino Effects in the Process Industries. Waltham, MA: Elsevier; 2013.
Renni E, Krausmann E, Cozzani V. Industrial accidents triggered by lightning. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010;184:42.
Salzano E, Iervolino I, Fabbrocino G. Seismic risk of atmospheric storage tanks in the framework of quantitative risk analysis. J. Loss Prevent. Proc. Indus. 2003;16:403–409.
Santella N, Steinberg LJ, Aguirre GA. Empirical estimation of the conditional probability of Natech events within the United States. Risk Anal. 2011;31(6):951–968.
Seligson, H.A., Eguchi, R.T., Tierney, K.J., Richmond, K., 1996. Chemical hazards, mitigation and preparedness in areas of high seismic risk: a methodology for estimating the risk of post-earthquake hazardous materials releases. Technical Report NCEER-96-0013, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo.
Sengul, H., 2005 Hazard characteriztion of joint natural and technological disasters (Natechs) in the United States using federal databases. Master Thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tulane University, New Orleans, USA.
Trbojevic, V.M., 2005. Risk criteria in EU. In: Proc. ESREL 2005, Tri-City, Poland, 27–30 June.
Uijt de Haag, P.A.M., Ale, B.J.M., 1999. Guidelines for quantitative risk assessment (Purple Book), CPR 18E, Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, The Hague, The Netherlands.
van den Bosch, C.J.H., Weterings, R.A.P.M., 1997. Methods for the calculation of physical effects (Yellow Book), Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Vílchez JA, Montiel H, Casal J, Arnaldos J. Analytical expressions for the calculation of damage percentage using the probit methodology. J. Loss Prevent. Process Indus. 2001;14:193–197.