Chapter 6. User Adoption

You can have all the right people on your ECM team, have support from the Executive suite and all your ECM components in place, but still fail to meet the goals that drove the decision to move forward with SharePoint in the first place. In this chapter, we will talk about how to maximize user adoption and sell the benefits of ECM throughout the project by having a clear understanding of the tangible and intangible aspects of having a community of users who love SharePoint.

Least common denominator

You are only as good as your least common denominator; in the case of your SharePoint ECM solution, the least common denominator is the user. To illustrate this point, we will use Coho Winery as an example. The project team has just finished implementing the ECM solution using SharePoint 2013. The team methodically built an Information Architecture (IA) plan, managed the project effectively, and utilized a detailed testing and quality assurance model. The ECM solution has all the functionality they require; it’s easy to use and solves many business performance and legal issues. The primary driver for Coho was to have an ECM solution to help mitigate the legal risks of not having access to the documents they needed during the discovery phase of a potential lawsuit.

Two years after the ECM deployment, they get sued, and they now think that they are prepared, knowing that all of their content should be in the ECM system. Unfortunately, the content stored in SharePoint is incomplete due to low user adoption. The problem was that they did not focus enough on training and on user adoption. As users became frustrated, they quietly refused to use the system. They were not aware that content specific to the case was stored on local and shared network drives instead of SharePoint. In this example, the records needed to support a proper defense were not found until later discovery efforts uncovered the documents that would become the cornerstone of their defense. This caused increased legal fees, court penalties for not producing discoverable material in a timely manner, and time delays in getting the case settled.

You can illustrate similar examples where content either not stored or stored incorrectly in an ECM system that the organization assumes is being used can cause a lot of problems. But it does not have to be that extreme. Users engaging with SharePoint are where the return on investment for the system develops. Therefore, if they do not use it, the time and money put into the system is a waste.

To get user adoption you must achieve the following:

  1. Create new habits.

  2. Get users on your side.

  3. Motivate users emotionally.

  4. Give everyone a reason to visit SharePoint.

  5. Create camaraderie and competition.

You can make mistakes in the initial deployment of the ECM system, and you can even omit functionality, but there is no wiggle room when it comes to effective user adoption.

Preparing the organization

Working on your user adoption starts as soon as the ECM solution is an idea or concept that the organization is seriously considering. Because you are reading this book, we must assume that using SharePoint to build an ECM solution is more than just an idea and probably an actual project that has been approved. So if you have not already been working on your user adoption strategy, you have already fallen behind. That might sound ominous, but it’s true, so let’s start working on user adoption right now or, at the very least, as soon as you’re done with this chapter.

Sometimes the language used to describe users and the tools used to increase adoption feel similar to the ways you might deal with children. Because users are already very busy, adverse to change, and not always welcoming of instruction, they can behave like toddlers at times. We do not mean to denigrate the intelligence of the user but to frame their initial impression of the system in an easy-to-consume way.

When you start introducing the solution into the organization, we recommend that you not talk right away about SharePoint or ECM. You should begin internal dialog with users by using business language to illustrate the problems of bad content storage and help identify with users about the inefficiencies and risk associated with the volume, findability, and duplication of content. Ask lots of questions and then actively listen; don’t rush to solve the problem with SharePoint. Take notes and be patient, start building a story, and be cognizant of the terms and language each person uses to describe the challenges and chaos of poorly managed records and content.

Getting users to identify early on with the areas where productivity suffers as a result of looking for content and documents will help you when you begin to form a team and design an ECM solution that will address the problem. If you can help the users begin to identify with how nice it would be to solve some of these issues, it will help in the overall acceptance of best practices and culture shifts that are needed. In this way, SharePoint isn’t being forced up on them; it is being crafted in their minds as their idea, which creates ownership. A successful best practice or method for you to engage in is performing content audits with various users in the organization. This can help identify key areas that can be used to focus users on the pain that they are experiencing but might not recognize. During a content audit, you will uncover ways to prove and help justify changes in content storage behavior. Here are some basic areas for consideration that most organizations uncover after a content audit:

  • Users are searching for content but not finding it. Find out how much time the average user spends looking for documents.

  • A large number of high-risk documents are stored in shared drives and lack proper security or backup.

  • A number of documents have gone past the appropriate retention period and should be deleted, because when not deleted, they pose a potential liability or risk to the organization.

  • The organization has a high quantity of nonbusiness related documents and content.

  • The organization has a high quantity of duplicate records and content.

  • A large number of business documents are saved in the average user’s mailbox as email attachments.

We have listed these all as open-ended problems. Your goal should be that the users become conscious about their content and how much time they are wasting on just trying to find it, and occasionally duplicating tasks already completed by other users. This behavior will drive some chatter within departments about how bad the problem is, and users will make a self-motivated attempt to be better at content storage. If possible, it’s best that this is done on a per-department level. When you have completed this effort, make sure to provide the results of the content audits to the managers of each department.

On a parallel track, start to introduce SharePoint to the organization. We will discuss this in more detail in the following sections.

The bottom line is that the ECM team should know where they are with user adoption at the point of project creation, when the initial blueprint of SharePoint is created, during implementation, and throughout deployment. We find that most often organizations consider adoption only after deployment and, in most cases, as a reaction to poor user feedback.

Encourage behavior

The best way to get consistent and regular adoption of SharePoint is by creating good habits. To encourage proper behavior, you should offer more than just talk. For it to be taken seriously, it should be called out specifically in the project budget. As a part of your SharePoint implementation budget, there should be a line item for change management that includes user adoption activities and communications. This should make up 5 percent to 15 percent of the overall budget.

This budget can be spent on typical items such as formal training. But you should also consider other more unique programs and activities. Depending on the type of organization and employee policies, you should consider monthly gifts for the users who achieve the highest contribution and usage of the system. Incentivizing the user community works very well to build healthy competition and puts real value on good adoption of the ECM solution.

To do this successfully, you need to decide upfront the metrics to use and how to track them. Avoid making the measurement subjective. There are third-party tools that make this tracking very easy. If you do not have access to such tools, you will want to use individual site statistics and audit reports.

Note

We suggest the use of third-party tools occasionally in the book, and we will be outlining them in Chapter 10. This will include many useful links, including some of our favorite apps and administrative tools for metrics.

With a little effort, you can automate this reporting into a dashboard for easy reporting. Some organizations even take it one step further and publish a user leader board as a web part in all sites, putting it right in front of all users so that they know that other users in the organization are using the system in an active way.

Another way to encourage adoption, which is a soft motivation, is to find a way to get everyone involved. For example, create programs where users create new functionality, or suggest new functionality to the system. Or perhaps set up an employee-contributed forum where users get ranked for posting content to help the entire organization. For small companies, this could be as simple as users publishing and getting credit for SharePoint Tips and Tricks emails that can be sent out periodically. Do not underestimate the power of your users trying to improve their experience and get visibility for their contributions in the organization. If you can create a mindset that SharePoint will not only improve their productivity but their worth as a team member, you have done a great job.

Allowing users to suggest new functionality can be a tricky but very powerful game. This is easiest when it impacts web parts, branding, and user interface instead of core ECM features and IA. Make sure that you have a clear understanding of what you are trying to accomplish before you jump in, and if you do, you won’t regret it.

In addition to incentives, the next best tool in a successful campaign to drive user adoption is to build an army of super users.

The super user

The super user can be defined as an individual who works with departments and individual functions within the organization to encourage better adoption of core content management best practices. This can be as simple as evangelizing a standard file naming convention to helping other users with frequently asked questions. We have compiled the following list of qualities that make an average user a super user:

  • A super user must already have a clear picture of “why ECM?” and “why SharePoint?” They should have at the very least read the Introduction of this book.

  • A super user must already know how to use SharePoint 2013 ECM functionality. We are not saying that they have to be technical, but they should be able to answer FAQs on usage.

  • A super user should be self-motivated to using SharePoint for themselves.

  • A super user should be self-motivated to help the ECM team. These individuals usually spot an opportunity to put something new on their resume and tend to look in the direction of technology.

  • A super user is incentivized by positive career goals. Anytime you can tie the success of a project to future opportunities, people will generally put in extra effort.

After you have identified the super users, you need to make sure the organization knows who they are and that they are the first person to go to with any questions. It is good to formalize this group of super users with monthly meetings and some compensation incentives, such as a pay raise, bonuses, or even small perks such as tickets to a sporting event or a gift card.

The community

The broader world of super users is the SharePoint community. The SharePoint community, unlike any other enterprise-level platform, is extremely vocal and strong. They can be found on the web, at SharePoint Saturday events, and on social media sites. We have outlined these in greater detail and encourage you to engage with the community early and often. This will be your greatest asset as you strive to answer even the most difficult SharePoint challenges.

The web

Simple searches on the web will help you find a huge collection of articles and blogs on SharePoint. You will quickly identify who the leaders and influencers in the space are. You should encourage super users and end users to search for answers to their questions. There is no better accomplishment than solving a problem on your own. Of course, make sure that their user rights prevent them from breaking anything.

SharePoint Saturdays and SharePoint user groups

These local community events are one of the best ways to get real world information on how to use SharePoint, without spending a dime. Even if a user attends a user group session not related to ECM, they will have a better understanding of SharePoint in general and more enthusiasm for the platform. Encourage your users, or even mandate that they attend at least one of these events in a given time period. You should be able to find a SharePoint user group in your area. If not, you are always welcome to attend the SharePoint Saturday events.

Social media

As mentioned earlier, the SharePoint community is very strong. If users in your organization use Twitter, they can post a tweet using hash tag #SPHelp. This is a hash tag that the SharePoint experts monitor and respond to very regularly. Also, you can execute a simple SharePoint user group Bing search and find a huge set of experts who love to help individuals and organizations get better use of their SharePoint deployments. There are several LinkedIn groups dedicated to SharePoint that have very useful posts and legions of active users.

The experts

Unlike many platform experts who are hard to find, SharePoint experts find you. The leading experts in the SharePoint space carry with them the titles MCM and MVP. MCM is the Microsoft Certified Master. There are only a handful of these, and they have passed a series of very complex tests and labs to receive the designation. Many MCM individuals are also Most Valuable Professionals (MVPs). MVP is a status given by Microsoft to individuals it believes are valuable and influential in the SharePoint space to increase proper usage and adoption. Most MVPs specialize in one technical area or another, but they can always connect you with someone who can solve your problem. There are roughly 120 SharePoint MVPs at the point of writing this book.

When you have empowered your users with tools that are both internal and external of the organization, you have given them no excuse not to embrace the platform and become an expert themselves.

The change manager

We have talked about encouraging behaviors as a way to cement solid user adoption, and we suggested that, for this effort to be taken seriously, you should line-item budget for change management. This is often the most overlooked part of any SharePoint project. Even though it is implicitly stated for most SharePoint projects that the goal is to improve content accessibility, communication, and increase productivity, the changes required at an individual user level to accomplish adoption are rarely planned for.

Some organizations see this as a traditional role filled by a training department, but it is much more than just training users on what buttons to click and what functions to perform. If you don’t already have a training department or manager responsible for user training, we suggest that you appoint a specific person to this task. A Change Manager will focus on all aspects of change and the effects that changes will have at the micro and macro levels of the organization. As part of the Change Manager role, consider the following items:

  • Policy and procedure updates

  • Forms and communication updates and standards

  • Training materials development and FAQs

  • Regular blog posts and/or video messages

  • Quality and user acceptance testing

Each organization is unique, and the preceding items can be covered as part of several individual roles and responsibilities, so adjust your change management planning and assignments accordingly. Remember that people don’t like change; that’s a fact. The more you prepare people for the change, the less scary it is and the more likely you will be to achieve a high degree of satisfaction with the ECM solution.

But it can take more than all of this, and sometimes good adoption comes down to simple look and feel. How does the site make me feel, what emotions does it evoke, and how easy is it to navigate?

Branding

ECM is a somewhat plain vanilla type of business application. There is not a lot to get excited about. Unlike extranet, public websites, and intranets, there usually is not much thought put into the look and feel of the ECM sites. But it does matter, and it can make a huge difference if you put the time and effort into the branding aspect of the site(s).

To some users, if they feel like they are walking into a hospital with sanitary walls and boring décor, they can end up dreading the application all together. Adding a little flair to your environment will help with user adoption and the friendliness of the platform.

The trick with branding is to do the right amount. You can do too little, which is out-of-the-box look and feel. You can also go over the top by having too much branding. This can be distracting from regular usage, and even worse, it complicates the modification of any functionality and makes any future migration impossible. Also, too much branding that changes the way SharePoint behaves can actually work to cause problems in user adoption because the behavior of SharePoint ECM and other SharePoint applications will not be consistent. While no elements of branding are really tied to ECM functionality, you can do some simple things to make the look and feel more popular, such as the following:

  • Web parts are the easiest way to change the look and feel of a site without impacting the core ECM functionality. Web parts can be added to any second-level site page. For example, the most useful web parts for ECM are content query web parts that show the latest content or that show the user leader board.

  • Finding colors and small graphics to use as Favicons and in site root pages is a simple way to help the user feel more comfortable. No need to create custom style pages, but creating a custom theme is a good first step.

  • Use naming conventions in site names, and use document library names that are less sterile and friendly. There is a reason that, in the IA section of this book, we called the hub for all the ECM sites the ECMCafe; this is an OK name that is not as sterile as ECM Home. But you can probably come up with something even be better and tie into a theme in your organization.

The look and feel of a site has a lot to do with how users perceive the usefulness of the site.

Bad for adoption

Because we have focused mainly on the items that we believe will help drive successful adoption of your ECM solution, we should also talk about the things that will hinder or destroy a user’s successful adoption of SharePoint. Each organization is different, and some are just stuck due to immovable obstacles in the company culture that prevent change. If this is the case in your organization, you will just have to do the best you can or look for another opportunity elsewhere.

Bad habits

When you get to the root of most objections to using the platform, it comes down to habits. Users fear change. The worse thing to do in these cases is to try to accommodate. Rather than accommodating the users with features that they are comfortable with or allowing exceptions to the rule, repeat on a regular basis the reasons of why you are doing it and why it’s better for them. The moment you give in to habits is when the system starts unraveling at a rapid rate.

Counter ECM features

There are several features in SharePoint that allow the user to contradict their ECM usage. They are Explorer view, Workspaces, email-enabled lists, and email-based libraries. Essentially, all these tools do is allow the user to live outside of SharePoint, thus preventing them from gaining any familiarity and comfort with the system and setup. Even worse, some of these tools, such as Explorer view and Workspaces, actually allow the user to contribute content to the ECM platform with no metadata, thereby bypassing all content type required elements. This will result only in bad habits and proliferation of bad content. Remember that it’s not what you get right that hurts you; it’s what you miss or contribute incorrectly that will lead into trouble both for the user and the organization.

Note

While these features encourage rapid addition of content, it’s content that will later cause issues with the platform. There are third-party tools that give email-enabled libraries the features required to make them useful in ECM. It’s important to be aware of possible problems, such as poor metadata that some features can create, and when evaluating third-party tools, make sure that these limitations do not exist.

Keywords and ratings

These features actually seem like they are useful for ECM. In the case of keywords, they are only useful if you also impose the strict taxonomies mentioned in the IA portion of the book. They are a useful way for users to use their own tags and dialect to provide metadata to documents. However, problems can arise if you use it without a mandated taxonomy, because users will default to keywords as an easy way to just get content into SharePoint. This will result in every possible keyword and spelling of keywords to be entered, and no consistent behavior in using search and browsing.

Ratings are another feature that seems useful and beneficial for helping with user adoption, if it’s accurate. The catch is that only a large organization of 5,000 users or more, with a lot of content being consumed and rated, can have enough of an impact on the ratings; in this case, it can be very useful. In these organizations, there is enough input to give a sense of the quality of documents so that you can sort and search on highly rated documents. Ratings can be effective only if there is a high enough frequency of honest ratings and a library where 70 percent or more of the documents have been rated in such a way.

MySites

You are probably surprised that at this point we have not yet mentioned MySites as a tool for increasing adoption. There are rare very well-controlled cases where this is true. But in our experience, it’s more of a detractor and actually serves to confuse users. The fact is that MySites can also be used as a document repository; users can live in and store their content there instead of in the IA you have designed for them to use. MySites can help by adding some personality to the entire SharePoint experience and some identity to what is going on, but without making a specific project out of deploying it and how it’s used, we have not seen success and have seen MySites counteract efforts in the ECM application.

Adoption is 20 percent functionality and 80 percent people. It’s far easier to get the technology portion right, and really, there is no excuse not to. There are some features in SharePoint that both help and discourage adoption, so like anything else, it’s a balancing act. At some point, dealing with the people element is a messy business, and sometimes there is no better answer then strict enforcement.

Enforcing the plan

Strictly enforcing ECM usage is a painful process at the beginning. Be prepared to make enemies. But as examples are made of a few bad outcomes based on not following the prescribed usage, it will become easier very fast, as long as you stick with it and remain consistent.

Setting up the rules, and plans for user adoption is tactical and has a clear beginning and end, and reinforcing those plans never ends. First and foremost, you and the ECM team must have been given the power to execute an enforcement plan with users who adopt poor usage of the system. This is not to say that we are going to punish people; instead, it would be beneficial to have these use cases highlighted with the appropriate method or solution so that others can learn and avoid the same mistakes. Also, we aren’t trying to make an example of anyone’s mistakes, so always illustrate the corrective action using a generic user name.

There will be times when not making it clear that the importance of using the ECM solution properly is not an option. Improper usage of the ECM solution should be treated as seriously as insubordination and poor performance. Your organization faces risk and legal ramifications for inappropriate or lackadaisical use of SharePoint, which will make ECM adoption of best practices more difficult. As we alluded to earlier, if your organization is not ready to take content management seriously, they most likely are not yet ready for a true ECM solution. This must be understood before you embark on your ECM SharePoint project.

Next steps

The organization will readily adopt a solution that is built with every user in mind. By systematically engaging the user community early and often, your ability to seamlessly roll out the ECM solution to enthusiastic users who fervently adopt SharePoint will be without equal. You will not encounter the kind of revolt or quiet disruption that often accompanies projects that are designed and implemented in a vacuum. In the next chapter, we will be providing you with a planning guide to use as a roadmap and checklist. We will incorporate everything we have covered in a concise and easy-to-follow format.

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset