Bibliography

  1. [ABE 05] ABELLO A., “La propriété intellectuelle, une ‘propriété de marché’”, in FRISON-ROCHE M.-A., ABELLO A. (eds), Droit et économie de la propriété intellectuelle, LGDJ, Paris, 2005.
  2. [AGH 05] AGHION P., BLOOM N., BLUNDELL R. et al., “Competition and innovation: An inverted-u relationship”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 701–728, 2005.
  3. [ARO 08] ARORA A., CECCAGNOLI M., COHEN W., “R&D and the Patent Premium”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1153–1179, 2008.
  4. [ARO 13] ARORA A., ATHREYE S., HUANG C., Innovation, Patenting and Licensing in the UK: Evidence from the SIPU Survey, research funded by UK Intellectual Property Office, Newport, 2013.
  5. [ARO 16] ARORA A., COHEN W., WALSH J., “The acquisition and commercialization of invention in American manufacturing: Incidence and Impact”, Research Policy, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1113–1128, 2016.
  6. [ARR 62] ARROW K., “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention”, in NELSON R. (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Princeton University Press and NBER, Princeton, 1962.
  7. [BAT 15] BATEN J., BIANCHI N., MOSER P., Does Compulsory Licensing Discourage Invention? Evidence from German Patents After WWI, Working Paper no. 21442, National Bureau of Economic Research, July 2015.
  8. [BES 07] BESSEN J., HUNT R., “An Empirical Look at Software Patents”, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 157–189, 2007.
  9. [BES 08] BESSEN J., MEURER M., Patent Failure – How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2008.
  10. [BLI 06] BLIND K., EDLER J., FRIETSCH R. et al., “Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany”, Research Policy, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 655–672, 2006.
  11. [BOI 16] BÖING P., MÜLLER E., Measuring Patent Quality and National Technological Capacity in Cross-Country Comparison, ZEW Discussion Paper no. 16-048, 2016.
  12. [BOL 08] BOLDRIN M., LEVINE D., Against Intellectual Monopoly, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, 2008.
  13. [BOL 13] BOLDRIN M., LEVINE D., “The case against patents”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 3–22, 2013.
  14. [BRA 06] BRANSTETTER L., FISMAN R., FOLEY F., “Do Stronger Intellectual-Property Rights Increase International Technology Transfer? Empirical Evidence from US Firm-Level Panel Data”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 321–349, 2006.
  15. [CAS 15] CASSIER M., STOPPA-LYONNET D., “La Cour suprême libère les gènes, Justifications économiques et juridiques – Impacts sur l’innovation et l’offre de santé”, Médecine/Sciences, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 209–2013, 2015.
  16. [CGP 06] CGP: COMMISSARIAT GENERAL DU PLAN, Quel système de propriété intellectuelle pour la France d’ici 2020 ?, Prospective de la propriété intellectuelle pour l’État stratège (PIÉTA) Report, Paris, 2006.
  17. [CHO 17] CHOI J.P., GERLACH H., “A Theory of Patent Portfolios”, American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 315–351, 2017.
  18. [CIM 08] CIMOLI M., PRIMI A., Technology and intellectual property: a taxonomy of contemporary markets for knowledge and their implications for development, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies (Pisa), LEM Working Papers Series no. 2008/06, March 2008.
  19. [CLA 13] CLANCY M., MOSCHINI G.-C., “Incentives for Innovation: Patents, Prizes, and Research Contracts”, Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 206–241, 2013.
  20. [COH 00] COHEN W., NELSON R., WALSH J., Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not), NBER Working Paper 7552, 2000.
  21. [COH 02] COHEN W., GOTO A., NAGATA A. et al., “R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States”, Research Policy, vol. 31, no. 8–9, pp. 1349–1367, 2002.
  22. [COH 03] COHEN W., MERRILL S. (eds), Patents in the knowledge-based economy, report of the Committee on IPRs in the Knowledge-Based Economy, National Research Council, The National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2003.
  23. [COH 11] COHENDET P., PÉNIN J., “Patents to exclude versus include: Rethinking the management of intellectual property rights in a knowledge-based economy”, Technology Innovation Management Review, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 12–17, 2011.
  24. [COR 07] CORBEL P., Management stratégique des droits de la propriété intellectuelle, Gualino, Paris, 2007.
  25. [COR 12] CORBEL P., LE BAS C. (eds), Les nouvelles fonctions du brevet – Approches économiques et managériales, Economica, Paris, 2012.
  26. [DUG 98] DUGUET E., KABLA I., “Appropriation Strategy and the Motivations to use the Patent System: an Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level in the French Manufacturing”, Annales d’économie et de statistique, no. 49/50, pp. 289–327, 1998.
  27. [DUG 12] DUGUET E., LELARGE C., “Do Patenting increase the Private Incentives to Innovate? A Microeconomic Analysis”, Annals of Economics and Statistics, no. 107/108, pp. 1–38, 2012.
  28. [EE 16] EE: EUROPEAN ECONOMICS, Patent Assertion Entities in Europe – Their impact on innovation and knowledge transfer in ICT markets, Report, Joint Research Centre, Luxemburg, 2016.
  29. [ENC 06] ENCAOUA D., GUELLEC D., MARTINEZ C., “Patent systems for encouraging innovation: lessons from economic analysis”, Research Policy, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1423–1440, 2006.
  30. [FE 17] FE: FRONTIER ECONOMICS, The Economic Impacts of Counterfeiting and Piracy, report funded by BASCAP/ICC and INTA, 2017.
  31. [FMI 16] FMI, Fiscal Policies for Innovation and Growth, Fiscal Monitor – Acting Now, Acting Together, World Economic and Financial Surveys, pp. 29–58, April 2016.
  32. [FTC 03] FTC, To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy, Report of the Federal Trade Commission, October 2003.
  33. [FTC 16] FTC, Patent Assertion Entity Activity – An FTC Study, study by the Federal Trade Commission, October 2016.
  34. [GAL 12] GALLIÉ E.-P., LEGROS D., “French firms’ strategies for protecting their intellectual property”, Research Policy, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 780–794, 2012.
  35. [GAL 02] GALLINI N., “The Economics of Patents: Lessons from Recent U.S. Patent Reform”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 131–154, 2002.
  36. [GAM 16] GAMBA S., The Effect of Intellectual Property Rights on Domestic Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Sector, CESifo Working Paper no. 6004, July 2016.
  37. [GAN 08] GANS J., HSU D., STERN S., “The Impact of Uncertain Intellectual Property Rights on the Market for Ideas: Evidence from Patent Grant Delays”, Management Science, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 982–997, 2008.
  38. [GIU 05] GIURI P., MARIANI M. et al., Everything you always wanted to know about inventors (but never asked): evidence from the PatVal-EU Survey, LEM Working paper 2005/20, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies Pisa, September 2005.
  39. [GRA 03] GRAHAM S., MOWERY D., “Intellectual Property Protection in the US Software Industry”, in COHEN W., MERRILL S. (eds), Patents in the knowledge-based economy, Report, Committee on IPRs in the Knowledge-Based Economy, National Research Council, The National Acadamies Press, Washington DC, 2003.
  40. [GRA 99] GRANSTRAND O., The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property – Towards Intellectual Capitalism, Edward Elgar, Northampton-Cheltenham, 1999.
  41. [GRA 16] GRANSTRAND O., “History of patenting and IP management: the case of Japan”, Entreprises et histoire, no. 82, pp. 103–123, 2016.
  42. [GRE 10] GREENHALGH C., ROGERS M., Innovation, Intellectual Property, and Economic Growth, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2010.
  43. [GUE 07] GUELLEC D., VAN POTTELSBERGHE DE LA POTTERIE B., The Economics of the European Patent System: IP Policy for Innovation and Competition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007.
  44. [GUI 04] GUILHON B., Les marchés de la connaissance, Connaissance de la Gestion, Economica, Paris, 2004.
  45. [HAL 01] HALL B., ZIEDONIS R., “The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the US Semiconductor Industry, 1979–1995”, RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 101–128, 2001.
  46. [HAL 13] HALL B., HELMERS C., ROGERS M. et al., “The Importance (or not) of Patents to UK Firms”, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 603–629, 2013.
  47. [HAL 17] HALL B., SENA V., “Appropriability mechanisms, innovation, and productivity: evidence from the UK”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 26, no. 1–2, pp. 42–62, 2017.
  48. [HAN 15] HANDKE C., GIRARD Y., MATTES A., “Copyright and Innovation: Fit for Digitization?”, DIW Economic Bulletin, vol. 5, no. 16, pp. 223–230, 2015.
  49. [HEL 98] HELLER M., EISENBERG R., “Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research”, Science, no. 280, pp. 698–701, 1998.
  50. [HOE 11] HOEWER D, SCHMIDT T., SOFKA W., An information economics perspective on main bank relationships and firm R&D, Deutsche Bundesbank, Discussion paper Series 1, Economic Studies, no. 19, 2011.
  51. [INP 15] INPI, La propriété intellectuelle et la transformation numérique de l’économie – Regards d’experts, Report, October 2015.
  52. [JAF 04] JAFFE A., LERNER J., Innovation and its discontents: How our broken patent system is endangering innovation and progress, and what to do about it, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2004.
  53. [LAL 08] LALLEMENT R., “Évaluation et valorisation financière de la propriété intellectuelle : nouveaux enjeux, nouveaux mécanismes”, Centre d’analyse stratégique, La note de veille, no. 111, pp. 1–6, October 2008.
  54. [LAL 10] LALLEMENT R., “Marchés de la technologie et droits de propriété intellectuelle : éléments de cadrage statistique et enseignements d’expériences étrangères”, in Conseil d’analyse économique, Les marchés de brevets dans l’économie de la connaissance, no. 94, pp. 143–172, 2010.
  55. [LAL 14a] LALLEMENT R., “L’usage de la propriété intellectuelle par les entreprises : quels leviers pour de meilleures pratiques ?”, France Stratégie, La note d’analyse, no. 11, March 2014.
  56. [LAL 14b] LALLEMENT R., “Valorization of public research results and patents: elements of international comparison”, in GUELLEC D., MADIÈS T., PRAGER J.-C. (eds), Patent Markets in the Global Knowledge Economy – Theory, Empirics and Public Policy Implications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014.
  57. [LAN 03] LANJOUW J., SCHANKERMAN M., “Enforcement of Patent Right in the United States”, in COHEN W., MERRILL S. (eds), Patents in the knowledge-based economy, Report, Committee on IPRs in the Knowledge-Based Economy, National Research Council, The National Acadamies Press, Washington DC, 2003.
  58. [LEB 07] LE BAS C., Economie et management du brevet, Economica, Paris, 2007.
  59. [LEI 09] LEIPONEN A., BYMA J., “If You Cannot Block, You Better Run: Small Firms, Cooperative Innovation, and Appropriation Strategies”, Research Policy, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1478–1488, 2009.
  60. [LEM 05] LEMLEY M., SHAPIRO C., “Probabilistic Patents”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 75–98, 2005.
  61. [LER 07] LERNER J., ZHU F., “What is the impact of software patent shifts? Evidence from Lotus v. Borland”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 511–529, 2007.
  62. [LER 09] LERNER J., “The empirical impact of intellectual property rights on innovation: puzzles and clues”, American Economic Review, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 343–348, 2009.
  63. [LES 07] LESCH J., The First Miracle Drugs – How the Sulfa Drugs Transformed Medicine, Oxford University Press, New York, 2007.
  64. [LES 01] LESSIG L., The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World, Random House, New York, 2001.
  65. [LES 04] LESSIG L., Free Culture, How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity, The Penguin Press, New York and London, 2004.
  66. [LEV 03] LEVEQUE F., MENIERE Y., Economie de la propriété intellectuelle, La Découverte, Paris, 2003.
  67. [LEV 87] LEVIN R., KIEVORICK A., NELSON R. et al., “Appropriating the returns from industrial R&D”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, no. 3, pp. 783–820, 1987.
  68. [MAC 50] MACHLUP F., PENROSE E., “The Patent Controversy in the Nineteenth Century”, The Journal of Economic History, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 1950.
  69. [MAC 58] MACHLUP F., An Economic Review of the Patent System, Study of the Subcommittee on Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights of the Committee on the Judiciary 15, U.S. Congress Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 1958.
  70. [MAN 86] MANSFIELD E., “Patents and innovation: an empirical study”, Management Science, vol. 32, pp. 173–181, 1986.
  71. [MEN 14] MÉNIÈRE Y. (ed.), Can patent data predict the success of startups?, MINES ParisTech study funded by France Brevets, June 2014.
  72. [MOS 05] MOSER P., “How do patent laws influence innovation? Evidence from nineteenth-century world fairs”, The American Economic Review, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 1214–1236, 2005.
  73. [NOR 69] NORDHAUS W., Invention, Growth and Welfare: A Theoretical Treatment of Technological Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1969.
  74. [OEC 04] OECD, “Patents, Innovation and Economic Performance”, Conference proceedings of 28–29 August 2003, Paris, 2004.
  75. [OEC 05] OECD, Manuel d’Oslo: Principes directeurs pour le recueil et l’interprétation des données sur l’innovation, 3rd ed., Paris, 2005.
  76. [OEC 14] OECD, Shifting Gear: Policy Challenges for the next 50 Years, OECD Economics Department Policy Notes, no. 24, July 2014.
  77. [OEC 16] OECD-EUIPO, Trade in Counterfeit and Pirated Goods: Mapping the Economic Impact, Report, Paris, 2016.
  78. [OLL 13] OLLIVIER P., SIMON P., La gestion et l’usage de la propriété intellectuelle par les entreprises françaises, study carried out by Winnove for France Stratégie, 2013.
  79. [OUE 15] OUELLETTE L., Economic Growth and Breakthrough Innovations: A Case Study of Nanotechnology, WIPO Economic Research Working Paper, no. 29, 2015.
  80. [PAR 97] PARK J., GINARTE W., “Determinants of patent rights: A cross-national study”, Research Policy, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 283–301, 1997.
  81. [POS 05] POSNER R., “Intellectual Property: The Law and Economics Approach”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 57–73, 2005.
  82. [POT 11] VAN POTTELSBERGHE DE LA POTTERIE B., “The quality factor in patent systems”, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1755–1793, 2011.
  83. [PWC 11] PWC: PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, The 2015 Global Innovation 1000: Innovation’s new world order, Report, October 2011.
  84. [QIA 07] QIAN Y., “Do National Patent Laws Stimulate Domestic Innovation in a Global Patenting Environment? A Cross-Country Analysis of Pharmaceutical Patent Protection, 1978–2002”, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 436–453, 2007.
  85. [RAB 17] RABIER L., Brevets et normalisation technique : comment concilier concurrence et innovation ?, Lettre Trésor-Éco, no. 193, March 2017.
  86. [SAU 12] SAUNIERE J.-C., LEROYER S., Innovation collaborative et propriété intellectuelle – Quelques bonnes pratiques, study carried out by PwC on the request of INPI, 2012.
  87. [SCH 15] SCHUBERT T., “Infringement of intellectual property in innovation partnerships”, R&D Management, vol. 46, no. S2, pp. 596–611, 2015.
  88. [SCH 90] SCHUMPETER J., Capitalisme, socialisme et démocratie, Payot (first edition published in English in 1942), Lausanne, 1990.
  89. [SHA 01] SHAPIRO C., “Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard-Setting”, in JAFFE A., LERNER J., STERN S. (eds), Innovation Policy and the Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2001.
  90. [STI 08] STIGLITZ J., “Economic foundations of intellectual property rights”, Duke Law Journal, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1693–1724, 2008.
  91. [STR 16] STROWEL A., UTKU S., The trends and current practices in the area of patentability of computer implemented inventions within the EU and the U.S., final report of a study funded by DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology of the European Commission, Luxembourg, 2016.
  92. [TEE 86] TEECE D., “Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy”, Research Policy, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 285–305, 1986.
  93. [THE 15] THE ECONOMIST, “Time to fix patents”, p. 9, 8–14 August 2015.
  94. [TIR 16] TIROLE J., Économie du bien commun, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 2016.
  95. [WAL 03] WALSH J., ARORA A., COHEN W., “Effects of Research Tools Patents and Licensing on Biomedical Innovation”, in COHEN W., MERRILL S. (eds), Patents in the knowledge-based economy, Report, Committee on IPRs in the Knowledge-Based Economy, National Research Council, The National Acadamies Press, Washington DC, 2003.
  96. [WIP 11] WIPO: WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION, World Intellectual Property Report 2011, The Changing Face of Innovation, Geneva, 2011.
  97. [WIP 15] WIPO, World Intellectual Property Report 2015, Breakthrough Innovation and Economic Growth, Geneva, 2015.
  98. [WIP 16] WIPO, World Intellectual Property Indicators 2016, Economics & Statistics Series, Geneva, 2016.
  99. [ZIE 03] ZIEDONIS R., “Patent Litigation in the USA Semiconductor Industry”, in COHEN W., MERRILL S. (eds), Patents in the knowledge-based economy, Report, Committee on IPRs in the Knowledge-Based Economy, National Research Council, The National Acadamies Press, Washington DC, 2003.
..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset