After completing this chapter, you should be able to do the following:
• Determine when an Internal Revenue code (IRC) Section 754 election will allow a partnership or LLC to adjust its basis in its assets.
• Assess when a partnership or LLC should make a Section 754 election in order to allow it to adjust the basis of its assets.
• Recognize when a Section 754 election will require a partnership or LLC to decrease its basis in its assets.
• Assess required basis adjustments among partnership or LLC assets.
Partnerships offer more flexibility in tax planning than any other form of business. One area that exemplifies this flexibility is the ability of the partnership to adjust the basis of partnership assets to reflect the economic reality of certain transactions between the partnership and one or more of its partners, and even between two or more partners outside the partnership.
These basis adjustments are made under Section 754, in tandem with either Section 734 or Section 743. Mechanically, Section 754 governs only the method for making the required election to adjust basis in the case of certain distributions1 or upon certain transfers of partnership interests.2 A Section 754 election, once made by the partnership, applies to all subsequent distributions and transfers. This chapter will first describe situations in which a basis adjustment is permissible and the reasons for making a Section 754 election. It will then describe the mechanics of adjusting the basis of partnership property and discuss making the election itself. Finally, this chapter will address a special situation for which relief may be available if the election is not made.
The transfer of a partnership interest almost always creates a difference between inside and outside basis. This is so because the transfer price (the outside basis) is to a large extent based on the fair market value (FMV) of the underlying partnership assets, but this value seldom has any relationship to the tax basis of those assets. No adjustment to basis is permissible as a result of a transfer of a partnership interest by sale or exchange or on the death of a partner unless the election provided by Section 754 is in effect.3 Absent a Section 754 election, transfers of partnership interests may result in recognition of essentially the same income by both the transferor and transferee partners, and may affect the nature of the income to be recognized.
D acquires A's interest in the ABC Partnership for a cash payment of $30,000. A's basis in his partnership interest is $10,000. A's share of partnership assets immediately before the transfer is as follows:
Basis | FMV | |
Trade Receivables | $ − |
$ 10,000 |
Land | 10,000 |
20,000 |
$ 10,000 |
$ 30,000 |
A will recognize $20,000 gain on the sale as follows:
Ordinary Income (unrealized receivables) – Section 751(a) | $ 10,000 |
Capital Gain – Section 741 | 10,000 |
$ 20,000 |
Because D purchased A's interest in the partnership, rather than A's share of partnership assets, the acquisition does not affect the partnership's basis in its assets unless the partnership has a Section 754 election in effect. Assume that the partnership does not have such an election in effect, and chooses not to make one. Assume further that shortly after D's purchase of A's interest, the partnership collects the receivables. D will be allocated $10,000 in ordinary income from the transaction, and will increase the basis in his partnership interest to $40,000. In effect, A and D have both recognized the same income attributable to the unrealized receivable. Note that collection of the receivable did not change the value of D's interest in the partnership. Thus, if D subsequently sells the interest for its $30,000 value, he will recognize a capital loss of $(10,000), offsetting, to a certain extent, the income allocated to him from the collection of the receivables. Note however that any loss recognized by D on sale of the partnership interest will be characterized as a capital loss, while his income was ordinary. And, of course, no loss at all can be recognized until he sells the partnership interest, which may be far into the future.
If a Section 754 election is in effect, the difference between the transferee partner's basis in the partnership and the proportionate share of the partnership's basis in its underlying assets is treated as an adjustment to the basis of partnership assets. This adjustment is made solely for the benefit of the transferee partner. The adjustment can result in either an increase or a decrease in the transferee-partner's share of the partnership's basis in its assets. The allocation of the adjustment among partnership assets is made in accordance with rules established in Section 755. The following example demonstrates the effect of such a basis adjustment.
Assume the same facts as example 6.1, except that the partnership has a Section 754 election in effect at the time that D acquires his interest from A. The partnership will be entitled to increase its basis in its assets under Section 743(b) to reflect the gain recognized by A. This $20,000 basis adjustment will be allocated between the partnership's two assets as follows:
Old Basis | 743(b) Adjust | New Basis | |
Trade Receivables | $ - |
$ 10,000 |
$ 10,000 |
Land | 10,000 |
10,000 |
20,000 |
$ 10,000 |
$ 20,000 |
$ 30,000 |
Note that the preceding adjustments are made to D's share of the basis of partnership assets only. Basis adjustments under Section 743(b) are made solely for the benefit of the transferee partner. The other partners' shares of the partnership's basis in its assets are unaffected. Now when the receivable is collected, D will have $10,000 basis to offset against his share of the proceeds. He therefore will recognize no taxable income and will not adjust his outside basis in his partnership interest.
1. Pygmalion LLC had the following balance sheets at December 31:
Basis | FMV | |
Cash | 30,000 |
30,000 |
Property 1 | 145,000 |
225,000 |
Property 2 | 80,000 |
140,000 |
Property 3 | 105,000 |
145,000 |
Total Assets | 360,000 |
540,000 |
Capital, Ernie | 180,000 |
270,000 |
Capital, Carl | 90,000 |
135,000 |
Capital, Angie | 90,000 |
135,000 |
Total Liabilities & Capital | 360,000 |
540,000 |
On that date, Angie, who was a 25 percent partner in the partnership, sold her interest to Gary for $135,000 cash. None of the LLC's assets constitute inventory or unrealized receivables. Assuming that the LLC does not have a Section 754 election in effect and chooses not to make one, what will be Gary's share of the inside basis of the LLC's assets?
a. $90,000.
b. $135,000.
c. $360,000.
d. $540,000.
2. Assume the same facts as in the previous question, except that the LLC makes a Section 754 election for the year of the sale. What will be the amount of the LLC's required basis adjustment under Section 743(b)?
a. $0.
b. $45,000.
c. $90,000.
d. $135,000.
3. In the previous question, what will be the LLC's basis in Property 1 after making the required basis adjustment under Section 743(b)?
a. $145,000.
b. $165,000.
c. $225,000.
d. $190,000.
Under the general distribution rules of Sections 731 and 732, a difference between inside and outside basis may result from a distribution of partnership property. This difference may arise as a result of the recognition of gain or loss by the distributee-partner under Section 731, or as a result of the peculiarities of the provisions of Section 732, which governs the distributee-partner's basis in distributed property. If the partnership has a Section 754 election in effect (or chooses to make one for the year of the distribution), Section 734(b) requires the partnership to adjust its basis in its remaining assets in order to eliminate the resulting difference between outside and inside basis. The purpose of Section 734(b) is to prevent the double recognition of income or loss by both the distributee-partner and the remaining partners in the partnership. Thus, unlike Section 743(b) adjustments which are made solely for the benefit of the new partner, adjustments under Section 734(b) are made for the benefit of all remaining partners in the partnership. There are essentially four situations in which an effective Section 754 election permits an adjustment to the partnership's basis in its assets under Section 734(b).
When a distributee partner recognizes gain (whether or not the distribution is in complete liquidation of his or her partnership interest) and there is a Section 754 election in effect, the basis of undistributed partnership property is increased by the amount of the gain recognized.4 Gain is recognized only when the amount of cash received in the distribution exceeds the distributee partner's basis in his or her partnership interest. Because cash always has a basis equal to its fair market value, recognition of gain by the distributee partner means that the basis of the remaining assets is less than the remaining partners' basis in their partnership interests. Failure to increase the basis of undistributed partnership assets results in taxation of the same gain to the distributee partner at the time of the distribution and also to the remaining partners at the time of any subsequent sale of the partnership's remaining assets. This double taxation would eventually be offset, but not until the liquidation of the partnership when a loss or reduced gain would be recognized by the distributee partner.
The ABC Partnership has the following balance sheet at December 31:
Basis | FMV | |
Cash | $ 30,000 |
$ 30,000 |
Property A | 20,000 |
20,000 |
Property B | 10,000 |
40,000 |
$ 60,000 |
$ 90,000 |
|
Capital, A | $ 20,000 |
$ 30,000 |
Capital, B | 20,000 |
30,000 |
Capital, C | 20,000 |
30,000 |
$ 60,000 |
$ 90,000 |
On that date, the partnership distributed $30,000 cash to A in complete liquidation of her partnership interest. Prior to the distribution, A's basis in her partnership interest was $20,000, as indicated in the previous balance sheet.
A must recognize a $10,000 capital gain on the distribution under Section 731(a) ($30,000 cash received less $20,000 basis in her partnership interest). If the partnership does not have a Section 754 election in effect, the partnership's balance sheet after the distribution will be as follows:
Basis | FMV | |
Property A | $ 20,000 |
$ 20,000 |
Property B | 10,000 |
40,000 |
$ 30,000 |
$ 60,000 |
|
Capital, B | $ 20,000 |
$ 30,000 |
Capital, C | 20,000 |
30,000 |
$ 40,000 |
$ 60,000 |
Note that the gain recognized by A equals her one-third share of the unrealized gain inherent in the partnership's remaining assets. When these assets are sold, this share will be recognized again by the partnership, and allocated to partners B and C. That is, the partnership will recognize a $30,000 gain when these assets are sold, and B and C will each be allocated $15,000 of this gain, rather than $10,000 as would have been the case had A remained in the partnership. Thus, A's share of the gain is recognized twice – once when she retires from the partnership and again when the partnership sells its remaining assets.5
If the partnership has a Section 754 election in effect, Section 734(b) requires that it increase its basis in its remaining assets by the $10,000 gain recognized by A on the cash distribution. This adjustment will prevent partners B and C from having to recognize this gain again. It will also allow the partnership's tax balance sheet to balance without adjusting the capital accounts of the remaining partners, thus preserving the integrity of the partnership's tax balance sheet as well as the K-1s issued to the remaining partners.
4. The DEF Partnership has the following balance sheet at December 31:
Basis | FMV | |
Cash | $ 50,000 |
$ 50,000 |
Property 1 | 30,000 |
30,000 |
Property 2 | 10,000 |
55,000 |
$ 90,000 |
$ 135,000 |
|
Capital, D | $ 30,000 |
$ 45,000 |
Capital, E | 30,000 |
45,000 |
Capital, F | 30,000 |
45,000 |
$ 90,000 |
$ 135,000 |
On that date, the partnership distributed $45,000 cash to D in complete liquidation of her partnership interest. Prior to the distribution, D's basis in her partnership interest was $30,000 as indicated in the previous balance sheet. Assume that the partnership has a Section 754 election in effect. What will be the amount of its basis adjustment required under Section 734(b)?
a. $45,000.
b. $30,000.
c. $15,000.
d. $0.
Under Section 731(a)(2), it is possible for a partner to recognize a loss upon receipt of a distribution in liquidation of his or her partnership interest. A loss may be recognized only if
• the distribution is in complete liquidation of the distributee partner's interest in the partnership;
• the cash and basis of ordinary income assets (so-called “hot” assets such as inventory and unrealized receivables) distributed are less than the distributee partner's basis in the partnership interest; and
• no other assets are distributed to the partner.
In this situation, the distributee partner recognizes loss equal to the excess of his or her basis in his or her partnership interest over the sum of the cash received plus the basis (to the partnership) of the ordinary income assets received. This represents the exact reverse of the gain situation illustrated in example 6.3 in which cash is distributed in excess of the partner's basis in the partnership interest.
When a loss is recognized on a distribution, the basis of assets remaining in the partnership will generally exceed the aggregate basis of the remaining partners in their partnership interests. A subsequent sale of those assets by the partnership, when combined with the loss recognized by the withdrawing partner, results in more total loss (or less gain) being recognized than would be the case had the retiring partner remained in the partnership. As previous, the double deduction will be offset eventually when the remaining partners dispose of their interests in the partnership (or when the partnership liquidates). If a Section 754 election is in effect at the time of the distribution, however, a negative adjustment to the basis of the remaining partnership assets is required and the double deduction will never take place.6 The negative adjustment amount is generally equal to the loss recognized by the withdrawing partner.
The ABC Partnership has the following balance sheet:
Basis | FMV | |
Cash | $ 30,000 |
$ 30,000 |
Property A | 40,000 |
20,000 |
Property B | 20,000 |
10,000 |
$ 90,000 |
$ 60,000 |
|
Capital, A | $ 30,000 |
$ 20,000 |
Capital, B | 30,000 |
20,000 |
Capital, C | 30,000 |
20,000 |
$ 90,000 |
$ 60,000 |
The partnership distributes $20,000 cash to partner A in complete liquidation of her partnership interest. Assuming A's basis in her partnership interest is $30,000, she will recognize a $(10,000) capital loss on receipt of the distribution.
The partnership's balance sheets immediately after the distribution will be as follows:
Basis | FMV | |
Cash | $ 10,000 |
$ 10,000 |
Property A | 40,000 |
20,000 |
Property B | 20,000 |
10,000 |
$ 70,000 |
$ 40,000 |
|
Capital, B | $ 30,000 |
$ 20,000 |
Capital, C | 30,000 |
20,000 |
$ 60,000 |
$ 40,000 |
A has recognized a $(10,000) loss on receipt of the distribution. Yet the entire $30,000 pre-distribution built-in loss inherent in the partnership's balance sheets remains. Thus, a subsequent sale by the partnership of properties A and B will yield a combined loss of $(30,000). Partners B and C will now be allocated $(15,000) shares of the loss, rather than $(10,000) as would have been the case had A remained a partner.
If a Section 754 election had been in effect, this problem would be eliminated by Section 734(b). Under Section 734(b), the partnership would be required to reduce its basis in its remaining assets by $10,000 – the difference between its aggregate basis in its assets and the aggregate basis of its remaining partners in their partnership interests.
5. Ben was a 20 percent partner in Troutman Partners until his interest was liquidated this month. Ben's tax basis in his partnership interest was $50,000. He received a distribution consisting of $35,000 cash and zero-basis accounts receivable with a face value of $35,000 in complete liquidation of that interest. If the partnership had a Section 754 election in effect, what would be the amount of its basis adjustment under Section 734(b)?
a. $35,000.
b. $20,000.
c. $0.
d. $(15,000).
Section 734(b) is also triggered when a distribution results in a stepped-up or stepped-down basis in the distributed property in the hands of the distributee, even though no gain or loss is recognized.7 For example, under Section 732(b), a partner receiving a property distribution in complete liquidation of his or her partnership interest takes a basis in the property received equal to the remaining basis in his or her partnership interest (after reduction for any cash received in the distribution), regardless of the basis the partnership had in the distributed property.
If the partnership's basis in the distributed property differs from this amount, as will generally be the case, the total of the gain recognized by the distributee partner on a subsequent sale of the distributed assets and the gain recognized within the partnership on the sale of undistributed assets will differ from the total gain which would have been recognized if the distributee-partner remained a partner and all assets were sold within the partnership. A Section 734(b) adjustment will avoid this problem. The amount of the adjustment is measured by the difference between the basis of the distributed property to the partnership and its basis in the hands of the recipient partner.8
The ABC Partnership has the following balance sheets:
Basis | FMV | |
Cash | $ 30,000 |
$ 30,000 |
Property 1 | 20,000 |
20,000 |
Property 2 | 40,000 |
10,000 |
$ 90,000 |
$ 60,000 |
|
Capital, A | $ 30,000 |
$ 20,000 |
Capital, B | 30,000 |
20,000 |
Capital, C | 30,000 |
20,000 |
$ 90,000 |
$ 60,000 |
Assume the partnership distributes property 1 to partner B in complete liquidation of her partnership interest. Under Section 731, partner B will recognize no gain or loss on the distribution. Under Section 732, she will take a substitute basis in the property equal to her basis in her partnership interest immediately prior to the distribution (reduced by any cash received in the distribution). Thus, B's basis in property 1 will be $30,000, a step-up of $10,000 in the basis of this asset. The partnership's balance sheets immediately after the distribution will be as follows:
Basis | FMV | |
Cash | $ 30,000 |
$ 30,000 |
Property 2 | 40,000 |
10,000 |
$ 70,000 |
$ 40,000 |
|
Capital, A | $ 30,000 |
$ 20,000 |
30,000 |
20,000 |
|
Capital, C | $ 60,000 |
$ 40,000 |
Upon a subsequent sale of property 1, B will recognize a $(10,000) loss. Upon a subsequent sale of property 2, the partnership will recognize a $(30,000) loss. Thus, the total loss to be recognized upon sale of the properties has increased by $10,000 as a result of the distribution to B. If a Section 754 election is in effect, Section 734(b) requires the partnership to decrease its basis in remaining assets by $10,000 to reflect the step-up in the basis of property 1 resulting from the d istribution to B. The partnership's post-distribution balance sheet would then appear as follows:
Basis | FMV | |
Cash | $ 30,000 |
$ 30,000 |
Property 2 | 30,000 |
10,000 |
$ 60,000 |
$ 40,000 |
|
Capital, A | $ 30,000 |
$ 20,000 |
Capital, C | 30,000 |
20,000 |
$ 60,000 |
$ 40,000 |
6. QL Ranches is a general partnership with the following balance sheets:
Basis | FMV | |
Cash | 30,000 |
30,000 |
Property 1 | 63,000 |
42,000 |
Property 2 | 21,000 |
78,000 |
Property 3 | 36,000 |
75,000 |
Total Assets | 150,000 |
225,000 |
Capital, Lynn | 50,000 |
75,000 |
Capital, Robert | 50,000 |
75,000 |
Capital, Jamie | 50,000 |
75,000 |
Total Capital | 150,000 |
225,000 |
On December 31, in complete liquidation of his interest, the partnership distributed Property 3 to Robert. None of the partnership's properties constitute inventory or unrealized receivables. If the partnership has a Section 754 election in effect, what will be the amount of the required adjustment to the basis of its assets under Section 734(b)?
a. $25,000.
b. $14,000.
c. $0.
d. $(14,000).
7. Willow Ridge Partnership distributed property with a tax basis of $50,000 and a fair market value of $60,000 to Richard, a 20 percent partner, in complete liquidation of his interest in the partnership. Richard's basis in his interest prior to receipt of the distribution was $42,000. What is the amount of the resulting Section 734(b) adjustment which must be made if the partnership has a Section 754 election in effect?
a. $18,000.
b. $10,000.
c. $8,000.
d. $0.
8. In the previous question, what if Richard's basis in his interest had been $62,000, rather than $42,000? What would be the amount of the partnership's Section 734(b) adjustment?
a. $12,000.
b. $(2,000).
c. $0.
d. $(12,000).
Assets distributed to a partner in partial liquidation of his or her partnership interest (as opposed to a complete liquidation of that interest) generally take a carryover basis in his or her hands under Section 732(a). However, if the partnership's basis in the distributed property exceeds the distributee-partner's basis in his or her partnership interest, his or her basis in the distributed property is limited to his or her basis in his or her partnership interest (reduced by any cash received in the distribution). Under Section 732(a)(2), the distributee-partner's basis in distributed property cannot exceed his or her pre-distribution basis in his or her partnership interest.
As a result of this, a low basis partner will often take a stepped-down basis in property received in a non-liquidating distribution or a distribution in partial liquidation of his or her interest. When this happens, the distributee partner will recognize more gain upon a subsequent disposition of the property than the partnership would have recognized upon disposition of the same property. Moreover, because the gain inherent in the partnership's remaining assets remains unchanged, the total amount of gain to be recognized by the partnership and the distributee partner combined upon disposition of the partnership's assets will be greater than if the distribution had not been made and all assets had been sold by the partnership. A Section 754 election will allow the partnership to increase its basis in its remaining assets to alleviate this problem. The basis adjustment required under Section 734(b) in this case is equal to the difference between the basis taken by the distributee-partner in the distributed property and the pre-distribution basis of such property in the partnership's hands.9 As noted in previous examples, the Section 734(b) adjustment also allows the partnership to maintain the integrity of its balance sheet (tax) and the Schedules K-1 issued to its partners.
Assume the ABC Partnership has the following balance sheet:
Basis | FMV | |
Cash | $ 20,000 |
$ 20,000 |
Property 1 | 30,000 |
30,000 |
Property 2 | 10,000 |
100,000 |
$ 60,000 |
$ 150,000 |
|
Capital, A | $ 20,000 |
$ 50,000 |
Capital, B | 20,000 |
50,000 |
Capital, C | 20,000 |
50,000 |
$ 60,000 |
$ 150,000 |
Assume the partnership distributes property 1 to A in partial liquidation of her partnership interest (reducing her interest from one-third to one-sixth). Although the partnership's basis in property 1 was $30,000, A will take a basis in the property of only $20,000, her pre-distribution basis in her partnership interest. A subsequent sale of property 1 by A will thus trigger a $10,000 gain to her. Sale by the partnership of property 2 will still trigger a $90,000 gain. Thus, the distribution to A has increased the total combined gain to be recognized by the partners by $10,000.
If a Section 754 election is in effect, the partnership will be required under Section 734(b) to increase its basis in remaining assets (property 2) by the step-down in the basis of property 1 taken by A, or $10,000. The partnership's post-distribution balance sheet will be as follows:
Basis | FMV | |
Cash | $ 20,000 |
$ 20,000 |
Property 2 | 20,000 |
100,000 |
$ 40,000 |
$ 120,000 |
|
Capital, A | — |
$ 20,000 |
Capital, B | 20,000 |
50,000 |
Capital, C | 20,000 |
50,000 |
$ 40,000 |
$ 120,000 |
9. Grimace Partners has the following assets.
Basis | FMV | |
Property 1 | 63,000 |
42,000 |
Property 2 | 21,000 |
78,000 |
Property 3 | 36,000 |
75,000 |
Total | 120,000 |
195,000 |
The partnership distributes Property 3 in a non-liquidating distribution to a partner whose tax basis in her partnership interest was $30,000. If the partnership has a Section 754 election in effect, what will be the amount of its basis adjustment under Section 734(b)?
a. $6,000.
b. $(6,000).
c. $39,000.
d. $0.
After the partnership makes a Section 754 election or when a Section 754 election is already in effect for the partnership, the partnership must allocate the amount of the adjustment among its remaining assets. This allocation must be made in a manner that will reduce the difference between the fair market value and the adjusted basis of the partnership properties.10 How this allocation is made depends on the type of triggering event.
When a partner transfers an interest in a partnership by sale or bequest, and the partnership has a Section 754 election in effect or agrees to make such an election, Section 743(b) requires that the partnership adjust its basis in its assets to reflect the amount paid for them by the acquiring partner. For this purpose, all assets of the partnership are classified as either
• Capital assets and Section 1231 (b) assets (capital gain assets), or
• All other assets (ordinary income assets).11
After classifying all partnership assets, the partnership must allocate the basis adjustment first between the two classes of assets and then among the assets within each class. The regulations under Section 755 require that both allocations be based on a hypothetical sale of all partnership assets for their fair values.12 Allocation of the basis adjustment is then based on the amount of gain or loss that would be allocated to the transferee-partner as a result of the hypothetical sale. Thus, some assets may be allocated negative adjustments and others allocated positive adjustments even though the total adjustment is positive (or negative). Indeed, the regulations make clear that positive and negative adjustments may be made to different assets of the partnership even when the total adjustment under Section 743(b) is zero.13 Note that the principles of Section 704(c) are applied in making this determination, so that the acquirer of an interest from a contributor-partner is protected from the seller's share of both the partnership's Section 704(b) book gain and his or her Section 704(c) tax gain.
The adjustment is first made to the ordinary income class of property. The adjustment to this class of property is equal to the amount of income, gain, or loss that would be allocated to the transferee-partner (including Section 704(c) allocations) from the sale of all partnership ordinary income property in the hypothetical sale. The remainder of the Section 743(b) adjustment is then made to capital asset class of partnership properties.
Assume the JDR Partnership has the following balance sheets:
Basis | FMV | |
Cash | $ 20,000 |
$ 20,000 |
Inventory | 50,000 |
45,000 |
Property 1 | 25,000 |
75,000 |
Property 2 | 85,000 |
100,000 |
$ 180,000 |
$ 240,000 |
|
Capital, J | $ 90,000 |
$ 120,000 |
Capital, D | 45,000 |
60,000 |
Capital, R | 45,000 |
60,000 |
$ 180,000 |
$ 240,000 |
J has a 50 percent interest in partnership profits, losses, and capital. D and R each have 25 percent interests. However, J's share of the basis of partnership assets is only $90,000. Assume she sells her interest in the partnership to Q for $120,000, recognizing a $30,000 gain. Q takes a $120,000 basis in her partnership interest, but only has a $90,000 share of the inside basis of the partnership's assets. If the partnership has a Section 754 election in effect, it will be required to adjust its basis in its assets; this adjustment is made solely for Q's benefit, to keep her from recognizing gain on the future sale of the partnership's assets in excess of her economic gain (that is, to keep J's gain from being taxed twice).
Assume that the partnership's inventory is not contributed property for purposes of Section 704(c). Further assume that both properties 1 and 2 are capital gain assets, and are also not contributed property under Section 704(c). If JDR sold all its assets in a fully taxable transaction for their fair market values immediately after Q's acquisition of J's partnership interest, Q would be allocated a $30,000 share of the partnership's total gain ($120,000 share of proceeds of the hypothetical sale, less $90,000 share of inside basis). Thus, her total basis adjustment under Section 743(b) would be $30,000. She would be allocated a $(2,500) share of the partnership's ordinary loss from sale of the inventory
(50 percent of the $5,000 loss). Thus, $(2,500) would be allocable to partnership ordinary income property (and reduce its basis with respect to Q) and $32,500 would be allocable to capital gain assets (and increase their basis with respect to Q). Note that this approach effectively allocates any discount (or premium) to the capital asset class.
Once the adjustment is allocated between the classes of property, the portion allocable to each class must be apportioned among the assets within that class. Generally speaking, this allocation is straightforward. Each asset within the class is allocated a basis adjustment equal to the amount of income, gain, or loss that would be allocated to the transferee-partner if the asset were sold for its fair market value immediately after the partner's acquisition of the partnership interest.14 If the total adjustment is less than the aggregate amount of gain that would be recognized by the transferee-partner, the deficit is divided among properties in the class by reference to their relative fair market values.15
Assume the same facts as example 6-7. The total basis adjustment under Section 743(b) is $30,000. Of this amount, negative $2,500 is allocated to the ordinary assets and positive $32,500 to the capital assets. The ordinary income class consists of only one asset, so the entire ($2,500) basis adjustment is allocated to this asset (inventory).
There are two assets in the capital asset class. The sale of properties 1 and 2 by the partnership would generate gains to the partnership of $50,000 and $15,000 respectively. As a 50 percent partner, half of each of these gains would be allocated to Q. Thus, the basis of property 1 will be increased by $25,000 (half of $50,000) and the basis of property 2 by $7,500 (half of $15,000).
In some cases, the amount of the basis adjustment may be less than the gain that would be allocated to the new partner. In such cases, as discussed previously, the shortfall is allocated among partnership properties by reference to their relative fair market values.
10. Partnership XYZ has the following balance sheets:
Basis | FMV | |
Cash | $ 15,000 |
$ 15,000 |
Inventory | 48,000 |
72,000 |
Property 1 | 24,000 |
36,000 |
Property 2 | 84,000 |
90,000 |
$ 171,000 |
$ 213,000 |
|
Capital, X | $ 57,000 |
$ 71,000 |
Capital, Y | 57,000 |
71,000 |
Capital, Z | 57,000 |
71,000 |
$ 171,000 |
$ 213,000 |
X sells her interest in the partnership to W for $71,000, recognizing a $14,000 gain. If the partnership has a Section 754 election in effect, what will be its adjusted basis in the inventory following the acquisition of X's interest by W?
a. $72,000.
b. $56,000.
c. $55,385.
d. $48,000.
PLT is a general partnership with the following balance sheets:
Basis | FMV | |
Cash | $ 15,000 |
$ 15,000 |
Property 1 | 30,000 |
45,000 |
Property 2 | 30,000 |
90,000 |
Property 3 | 75,000 |
90,000 |
$ 150,000 |
$ 240,000 |
|
Capital, P | $ 50,000 |
$ 80,000 |
Capital, L | 50,000 |
80,000 |
Capital, T | 50,000 |
80,000 |
$ 150,000 |
$ 240,000 |
P, a one-third partner, sells his partnership interest to C for $75,000, recognizing a $25,000 capital gain (his basis in the partnership interest was $50,000). Assuming the partnership has a Section 754 election in effect, it will be entitled to increase the basis of its assets by $25,000 (on behalf of C, the incoming partner). As a one-third partner, P's share of the basis and FMV of partnership assets was as follows:
Basis | FMV | Gain to C | |
Property 1 | 10,000 |
15,000 |
$ 5,000 |
Property 2 | 10,000 |
30,000 |
20,000 |
Property 3 | 25,000 |
30,000 |
5,000 |
$ 45,000 |
$ 75,000 |
$ 30,000 |
Because P sold the interest to C at a discount, the basis adjustment is less than the aggregate gain C will be allocated from sale of the partnership's assets. The $5,000 shortfall will be allocated among the three properties by reference to the relative values of each. Thus, one-fifth (15/75) will be allocated to property 1, and 2/5 each to properties 2 and 3. That is, $1,000 of the shortfall will be allocated to property 1 and $2,000 each to properties 2 and 3. The total basis adjustments to each property will be as follows:
C's Share of Gain | Allocated Deficit | Net Adjustment | |
Property 1 | $ 5,000 |
$ (1,000) | $ 4,000 |
Property 2 | 20,000 |
(2,000) | 18,000 |
Property 3 | 5,000 |
(2,000) |
3,000 |
$ 30,000 |
$ (5,000) |
$ 25,000 |
Thus, the bases of properties 1, 2, and 3 to the partnership will be $34,000, $48,000 and $78,000 respectively. Recall that these adjustments are made for C's benefit, as the new partner. C's share of the basis of each partnership asset will be as follows:
C's Share of Unadjusted Basis | Basis Adjustment | C's Share, After Adjustment | |
Property 1 | $ 10,000 |
$ 4,000 |
$ 14,000 |
Property 2 | 10,000 |
18,000 |
28,000 |
Property 3 | 25,000 |
3,000 |
28,000 |
$ 45,000 |
$ 25,000 |
$ 70,000 |
When a partnership interest is transferred as a result of the death of a partner, the beneficiary generally takes a stepped-up basis in the interest equal to its fair market value at the date of death (or the alternative valuation date if applicable). To the extent that any portion of the partnership interest constitutes income in respect of a decedent (IRD) under Section 691, however, the basis is not stepped up. Thus, for example, to the extent of the decedent's interest in partnership unrealized receivables, no step-up is allowed. The regulations under Section 755 make clear that no portion of any adjustment allowed under Section 743(b) may be allocated to the transferee-partner's interest in partnership items that constitute IRD.16
If goodwill exists at the time of the transfer and is reflected in the transfer price, it must be included in the allocation of the adjustment.17 All goodwill must be valued using the residual method (IRC Section 1060, enacted by the Tax Reform Act of 1986). This method specifies that purchase price be allocated
• First to cash and general deposit accounts; then,
• Marketable securities, certificates of deposits, and foreign currency; next,
• Accounts receivable, mark-to-market assets, and certain debt instruments from unrelated borrowers; next,
• Stock in trade and other inventory items; then,
• All other tangible assets; then,
• Tangible and intangible assets other than goodwill; and then,
• The balance to goodwill.
The effect of this requirement is only to specify the methodology for determining the value of goodwill. Once this value is established, goodwill is included in the classification of capital gain assets, and the remainder of the allocation under Section 755 is unchanged.
The allocation of an adjustment under Section 734(b) (due to a distribution of partnership property) is different from the allocation of an adjustment under Section 743(b) (due to the transfer of a partnership interest). The allocation of a Section 734(b) adjustment is made to assets of the same character as those that gave rise to the adjustment. As before, all assets of the partnership are classified as either capital gain assets or ordinary income assets.18 The allocation of the adjustment resulting from a distribution depends on the type of distribution triggering the adjustment.
11. Partnership ABC has the following assets:
Basis | FMV | |
Cash | $ 15,000 |
$ 15,000 |
Inventory | 24,000 |
36,000 |
Property 1 | 20,000 |
50,000 |
$ 59,000 |
$ 101,000 |
The partnership is required to reduce the basis of its assets by $(18,000) under Section 734(b) as the result of a distribution of capital gain property to a partner. What will be its tax basis in the inventory after the adjustment has been made?
a. $20,000.
b. $24,000.
c. $36,000.
d. $15,000.
Certain distributions (such as a distribution of cash in excess of basis) result in a taxable gain to the distributee partner, and other distributions result in a deductible loss. If the adjustment results from a distribution in which gain or loss was recognized by the distributee partner, the adjustment is allocated only to capital gain assets (as previously defined).19 Because the distributee partner recognizes capital gain or loss on the distribution, this approach preserves the character of the gain or loss subsequently recognized by the other partners. Within the category of capital gain assets, the adjustment must first be allocated to individual assets with unrealized appreciation (in the case of a positive adjustment) or depreciation (in the case of a negative adjustment) in value, but only to the extent of such unrealized appreciation or depreciation. In the case of a positive adjustment, if the total adjustment exceeds the aggregate unrealized appreciation in the value of partnership capital assets, the excess must be apportioned among all capital assets in proportion to their fair market values.20
In the case of negative basis adjustments, if the total negative adjustment exceeds the aggregate unrealized depreciation in value of remaining capital gain assets, the excess is to be allocated among all capital assets in proportion to their remaining adjusted basis.21
Finally, the maximum reduction in basis that can be made is to reduce the basis of the remaining capital gain property to zero.22 If this occurs, or if there is no capital gain property to which the basis adjustment can be applied, the adjustment is carried forward and “shall be made when the partnership subsequently acquires property of a like character to which an adjustment can be made.” 23
Wagner Partners is a general partnership with the following balance sheets:
Basis | FMV | |
Cash | $ 95,000 |
$ 95,000 |
Property 1 | 30,000 |
40,000 |
Property 2 | 115,000 |
75,000 |
$ 240,000 |
$ 210,000 |
|
Liabilities | $ 90,000 |
$ 90,000 |
Capital, B | 50,000 |
40,000 |
Capital, K | 50,000 |
40,000 |
Capital, X | 50,000 |
40,000 |
$ 240,000 |
$ 210,000 |
Assume that X receives a distribution of $40,000 cash in complete liquidation of her interest in the partnership. Her tax basis in the interest was $80,000 (including her $30,000 share of liabilities). Thus, she recognizes a $(10,000) capital loss on receipt of the liquidating distribution and relief of $30,000 in liabilities.
If the partnership has a Section 754 election in effect, it must reduce its tax basis in remaining assets by $10,000. This adjustment will be made to the partnership's capital and Section 1231 assets (assume that properties 1 and 2 are both capital assets). It is allocated first to assets that have adjusted bases in excess of their values. Here, only property 2 meets this requirement. Thus, the entire adjustment is made to the basis of property 2, and after the adjustment property 2 would have a tax basis of $115,000 – $10,000 = $105,000. If the loss on the distribution had exceeded $40,000 (the depreciation in property 2), the excess would have been allocated between properties 1 and 2 according to their relative basis amounts. If the distribution in complete liquidation had been $70,000, X would have had a recognized gain of $20,000. The adjustment would have been made first to property 1 and then to both properties based on their relative fair market values.
Under proposed regulations issued in November 2013, positive adjustments to the basis of Section 1245 property associated with the distribution of property to a partner are ignored in calculating the partnership's subsequent gain or loss realized upon sale of such property.24 The proposed regulations, which will not be effective until issued in the Federal Register as final regulations, provide that basis adjustments under Section 734 (for example, as a result of gain recognized by the distributee partner in connection with a cash distribution) will not reduce the amount of ordinary income recognized by the partnership under Section 1245 on the subsequent sale of such property. The proposed regulations clarify, however, that this is the only purpose for which such basis adjustments are ignored. Depreciation or amortization deductions may be claimed with respect to the basis adjustment and such deductions are taken into account in computing the property's recomputed basis. These proposed regulations, if finalized, will increase the complexity of subchapter K and create a potentially significant trap for the unwary.
If the adjustment is the result of a distribution in which the basis of the property distributed was increased or decreased, the adjustment must be made to property of a similar character to the distributed property from which the adjustment arose.25 Any increase in the basis of property distributed (for example, from a liquidating distribution where the inside basis of distributed property is less than the partner's outside basis) will result in a decrease in the basis of partnership property of the same class as the property whose basis was increased as part of the distribution. Any decrease in the basis of property distributed (for example, from a distribution where the inside basis of distributed property is greater than the partner's outside basis) will result in an increase in the basis of partnership property of the same class as the property whose basis was increased as part of the distribution. This approach attempts to preserve the character of the gain or loss to be recognized by the other partners.
Once the character of the asset is determined, the adjustment should be made in the same manner as described previously. That is, an increase will be made first to appreciated assets to the extent of their appreciation, and any remaining increase will be allocated according to the relative fair market values of the properties in that class of property. Any decrease would first be made to depreciated assets to the extent of their depreciation, and any further decrease would be allocated to property of the same class according to the relative adjusted basis of the properties in that class.
Where an increase or a decrease in the basis of undistributed property cannot be made because the partnership owns no property of the same character, or because the basis of all the property of the same character has been reduced to zero, the adjustment will be made when the partnership subsequently acquires property of a like character to which an adjustment can be made.
Haines Partners is a general partnership with the following balance sheets:
Basis | FMV | |
Cash | $ 75,000 |
$ 75,000 |
Property 1 | 60,000 |
40,000 |
Property 2 | 30,000 |
40,000 |
Property 3 | 75,000 |
55,000 |
$ 240,000 |
$ 210,000 |
|
Liabilities | $ 90,000 |
$ 90,000 |
Capital, A | 50,000 |
40,000 |
Capital, B | 50,000 |
40,000 |
Capital, C | 50,000 |
40,000 |
$ 240,000 |
$ 210,000 |
Assume that C receives a distribution of property 1 in complete liquidation of her interest in the partnership. Her tax basis in the interest was $80,000 (including her $30,000 share of liabilities). Thus, she will take a tax basis of $50,000 in property 1, a decrease of $10,000, and the partnership will be allowed to increase the basis of0 partnership property of a like class. If properties 1 and 3 were both inventory, and property 2 was a capital asset, the entire increase in basis would be allocated to the property of the same class as the distributed property, which in this case would be property 3.
If C received Property 2 in complete liquidation, and Properties 1 and 2 are both capital assets, the basis of Property 2 to C will be $50,000, an increase of $20,000. If the partnership has a Section 754 election in effect, it would be required to reduce the basis of Property 1 by $20,000.
12. Bar-X Partners has the following assets.
Basis | FMV | |
Cash | 30,000 |
30,000 |
Property 1 | 63,000 |
42,000 |
Property 2 | 21,000 |
78,000 |
Property 3 | 36,000 |
75,000 |
Total | 150,000 |
225,000 |
The partnership is obligated to reduce the basis of its assets (assume they are all capital assets) under Section 734(b) by $10,000. To which asset(s) will the basis adjustment be allocated?
a. Property 1.
b. Property 2.
c. Property 3.
d. All three properties.
13. The ABC Partnership has the following assets:
Basis | FMV | |
Cash | $ 60,000 |
$ 60,000 |
Property 1 | 20,000 |
20,000 |
Property 2 | 10,000 |
40,000 |
$ 90,000 |
$ 120,000 |
The partnership is required to make a positive basis adjustment under Section 734(b) in the amount of $10,000. Whatwill be the partnership's tax basis in Property 2 after the basis adjustment is made?
a. $10,000.
b. $15,000.
c. $20,000.
d. $40,000.
A Section 751 (b) distribution is one that results in a disproportionate distribution of “hot” assets (unrealized receivables and inventory items that have substantially appreciated in value). As discussed in the preceding chapter, a Section 751 (b) distribution is treated as part-sale and part-distribution. Practitioners should be careful to apply the provisions of Section 734(b) only to the distribution portion of the transaction when Section 751(b) applies.
The election to make the optional basis adjustments allowed by Sections 734(b) and 743(b) must be made in a timely partnership return filed in the year in which the distribution or transfer occurred or in a preceding year.26 The election must be signed by one of the partners and must include
• the name and address of the partnership; and
• a declaration that the partnership elects, under Section 754, to apply the provisions of Sections 734(b) and 743(b).
If a Section 754 election is not filed in a timely manner, the taxpayer may request an extension of time to make the election. Once made, an election under Section 754 is effective until revoked.
In any year in which a partnership adjusts the basis of property under Section 734(b), the partnership must attach a statement to its return showing the computation of the adjustment and the assets to which the adjustment has been allocated.27
A partnership wishing to revoke a Section 754 election must obtain the permission of the District Director for the IRS District in which the partnership is required to file its return (26 CFR Section1.754-1 (c)). The request must be filed within 30 days of the close of the partnership year for which the revocation will be effective, must set forth the grounds on which revocation is sought, and must be signed by a partner. Situations that may be considered valid justifications for revoking the election are
• A change in the nature of the partnership business.
• A substantial increase in the assets of the partnership.
When a partner obtains a partnership interest by transfer from another partner, he or she may not be able to force the partnership to make a Section 754 election even though it would be beneficial to the transferee-partner for the election to be made. In that instance, the transferee partner may be able to obtain some relief if
• The partner obtains all or part of the partnership interest by sale or exchange, or upon the death of a partner;
• Within two years of such transfer a distribution of assets from the partnership is made to the transferee partner; and
• The partnership did not make an optional basis adjustment upon the original transfer.28
In this circumstance, the distributee partner can elect to determine the basis of the distributed assets in his or her hands as if the basis adjustment under Section 743(b) had been made when the transfer originally occurred.
A partner wishing to make the election under Section 732(d) does so by attaching to his or her tax return a statement
• Stating that he or she is making an election under Section 732(d),
• Showing the computation of the special basis adjustment for the property distributed using the allocation rules under Section 755, and
• Showing the assets to which the adjustment has been allocated.29
If the distribution includes any property subject to the allowance for depreciation, depletion, or amortization, the election must be in the tax return for the year of the distribution. Otherwise, it must be made in the tax return for the first year in which the basis of the distributed property is pertinent in determining his or her income tax liability.30
The adjustment amount and the assets to which it is allocated are determined as of the date of the transfer. No adjustment is made for additional depletion or depreciation which would have been claimed if the Section 743(b) election had been made because no deduction was allowable for such amounts.31 If the property received in the distribution is not the same property which would have had a basis adjustment under Section 743(b), the basis adjustment under Section 743(d) can be applied to any like property received in the distribution so long as the transferee has relinquished his or her interest in the original basis adjustment property (whether or not the partnership still owns that property).32
A partner is required to apply the special basis rule of Section 732(d) to any distribution (whether or not within two years of his or her acquisition) if
• He or she acquired any part of his or her interest in the partnership by transfer when a Section 754 election was not in effect;
• At the date of his or her acquisition the fair market value of all partnership property (other than money) exceeded 110 percent of its tax basis;
• A distribution in liquidation immediately after the acquisition would have resulted in a shift of basis [determined under Section 732(c)] from property not subject to an allowance for depreciation, depletion, or amortization to property subject to such an allowance; and
• A basis adjustment under Section 743(b) would change the basis of the property actually distributed.33
14. Joe inherited a 20 percent interest in a real estate partnership from his grandmother. The partnership did not have a Section 754 election in effect, and opted not to make one. One year later, the partnership distributed appreciated property to Joe in a non-liquidating distribution. What will be Joe's tax basis in the property received from the partnership?
a. Its fair market value as of the date of Joe's grandmother's death.
b. The basis the partnership would have had in the property if a Section 754 election had been in effect at the date of his grandmother's death.
c. Joe will take a carryover basis in the property received equal to the partnership's basis in such property.
d. Joe will take a tax basis in the property received equal to his tax basis in the partnership interest just prior to receipt of the distribution.