After reading this chapter, you will be able to understand:
In trade and commerce, sales and purchase of goods are very common transactions. These transactions may appear to be very simple but the possibilities of complications are always there. Therefore, knowledge of basic principles of sale and purchase is very much essential for all the concerned parties as well as for the entire community. The Sale of Goods Act contains the basic principles as well as the legal framework of transactions of sale and purchase.
Earlier, the Sale of Goods Act was a part of the Indian Contract Act. A separate Act was framed in the year 1930. This act extends to the whole of India, except the State of Jammu and Kashmir. This act comes into force w.e.f. 1 July 1930.
Buyer means a person who buys or agrees to buy the goods.
Seller means a person who sells or agrees to sell the goods.
Delivery means voluntary transfer of the possession of goods from one person to another. Usually, the goods are delivered from the seller to the buyer. Immediate delivery of goods is not necessary or mandatory.
Price means the money consideration for the sale of goods. The money here means the currency in circulation. Remember any contract without consideration is usually not valid.
Goods means every kind of movable property other than actionable claims and money and includes stock and shares, growing crops, grass and things attached to or forming a part of the land, which are agreed to be severed before the sale or under the contract of sale.
Example
Shares, debentures, goodwill, water, fruit, sim card and newspaper are considered as goods.
Where the transfer of property in goods takes place at a future date.
Where the transfer of property in goods takes place at the time of contract.
The document of title of goods includes the following documents:
In the ordinary course of business, it is a proof of the possession of goods or authorizing either by endorsement or delivery, the possessor of the document to transfer or receive the goods.
Property means the general property in goods.
The property can be understood in two ways with reference to any goods; general property and special property. The general property in goods means ownership, while the special property means the possession or control of goods. Therefore, the transfer of property in goods is different from the delivery of goods. The delivery of goods means a transfer of special property in goods.
Example
When you pledge the jewelry with a bank as a matter of security for the repayment of the loan, you are only transferring the special property to the bank. Its general property (ownership) belongs to you.
The essentials of a contract of sale are as under:
There must be two parties. One cannot sell to himself. The seller and the buyer must be different. A part owner can sell goods to another part owner.
The subject matter of the contract of sale is goods. The goods must be movable. Immovable things are out of the purview of the act. The goods may be present or future.
The seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods. The transfer of property in goods means the transfer of general property.
The price is the consideration for the contract of sale of goods. The exchange of goods for goods is barter. Exchange is partly for goods and partly for money in a sale. In case where the promissory note or the negotiable instrument is given in exchange of the transfer of goods, it will be a sale since a negotiable instrument is always paid in money.
All essential elements of a valid contract must be observed because basically it is a contract.
No form of contract of sale is prescribed under the Sales of Goods Act. The contract of sale can be expressed or implied. The contract of sale may be in writing or by word of mouth. The contract of sale can be conditional or absolute.
The contract of sale may provide any of the following methods for the delivery of goods:
Subject Matter | Sale | Agreement to Sell |
---|---|---|
Transfer of ownership | In a sale, the ownership of goods is transferred immediately. | In case of an agreement to sell, the ownership will be transferred in future. |
Nature of contract | A sale is an executed contract. | An agreement to sell is an executor contract. |
If price is not paid | A seller can sue for the price. He has all the rights of an unpaid seller. | A seller can sue for damages. |
Risk | The buyer bears the risk. | The seller bears the risk. |
Type of goods involved | A sale takes place in the case of existing goods usually. | An agreement to sell takes place in the case of future goods. |
Subject Matter | Sale | Hire–Purchase |
---|---|---|
Meaning | It is a transaction where the ownership of goods is transferred immediately to the buyer. | It is an agreement where the hirer uses the goods on the payment of the installment and he has the option to return the goods. The ownership transfers on the payment of the last installment. |
Applicable Act | Sales of Goods Act, 1930. | Hire–Purchase Act, 1972. |
Parties | A contract of sale involves two parties namely the seller and the buyer. | Hire–purchase agreement involves two parties, the hirer and the hire vendor. |
Mode of forming contract | A contract of sale can be made orally or in writing. | The hire–purchase agreement should be in writing. |
Risk | The risk of loss passes to the buyer. | The risk of loss does not pass to the hirer as the ownership is not transferred. It will pass to the hirer when the last installment is paid. |
Return of goods | The buyer cannot return goods usually. | The hirer can return the goods. |
Sales Tax | The sales tax is payable immediately. | The sales tax is payable when all the installments are paid. |
A contract for work and skill is a contract if it involves the exercise of skill and labour by one party on some goods or materials supplied by the other party or supplied by the party who exercises skill and labour for the price.
Following are the main features of contract for work and skill:
The Sales of Goods Act is not applicable to this category of transaction. As the Sales of Goods Act is not applicable, there is no liability of sales tax.
Example
An artist was asked to paint a portrait. The material was supplied by the party and not by the painter. It was held to be a contract for work and labour and not of sale.
The goods forming the subject matter of the contract of sale may be classified as under:
Existing goods are in actual existing at the time of the contract of sale. The existing goods are the goods which are owned and possessed by the seller at the time of sale. The existing goods may be of three types:
13.8.1.1 Specific Goods The goods which are identified and agreed upon by the parties at the time of the contract of sale are specific goods. It should be noted that the goods must be both identified and agreed upon.
13.8.1.2 Ascertained Goods Ascertained goods are the goods which are identified after the formation of the contract of sale. When the unascertained goods are identified and agreed upon by the parties, the goods are called as ascertained goods.
13.8.1.3 Unascertained Goods These are the goods which are not identified and agreed upon at the time of the contract of sale. These goods are merely described by the parties at the time of the contract of sale.
Future goods are those goods which do not exist at the time of the contract of sale. These goods are to be manufactured or acquired by the seller after the making of the contract of sale. The future goods cannot be sold but there can only be an agreement to sell.
It is a kind of future goods. These goods are those goods, the acquisition of which is contingent upon the happening or non-happening of an uncertain event.
Example
A agrees to sell the cargo loaded on the ship ‘Victory’, which is coming from London to Bombay. The ship may or may not arrive. So, these goods will be called as contingent goods.
A, a farmer, agrees to sell B, mangoes, provided there is good rain during season. Is it sale or agreement to sell?
A agrees to sell B, all crops to be grown in his farm during 2011 season. It is contract about which type of goods?
A had 5 sofas. He agreed to sell one sofa to B. Is it contract for the sale of specific goods? If not, which type of goods?
The modes of determining the price are following:
The price is specified under the contract. It is the most common method of determining the price. Here, the parties decide the price in advance.
The price may be determined as per the method specified in the contract. Here, the parties decide in advance, the method of determining the price.
Example
Delivery of rice on 1 December 2008 at the rate prevailing on that day.
The price may be determined in accordance to the custom and the usage of the trade. This method is applicable if the parties regularly trade. Where the price is not fixed as above, the buyer shall pay the seller a reasonable price. ‘What is a reasonable price’ is a question of facts and circumstances. A reasonable price under the Sale of Goods Act means the market price.
The price may be determined by the third party. If it is so, the contract shall specify the name of the third party. If the third party fails to specify, the contract is void but if the goods are delivered to the buyer and used by him, he is required to pay a reasonable price. If the third party is prevented from fixing the price, the defaulting party is liable for the damages.
A agrees to sell his 100 bags of rice to B at a price to be fixed by C. But C failed to fix the price. Is it valid contract now?
The consequences of the destruction of specific goods can be discussed under the following three heads:
The contract is void-ab-initio. due to the mistake as to the existence of the subject matter. It is to be noted that if the seller has knowledge about the destruction of goods, even then he enters into the contract of sale with the buyer then the seller is bound to compensate to the buyer.
If the goods were divisible then the contract can be enforced partly and if the goods were indivisible then the contract becomes void-ab-initio.
Example
A contracted to sell one wagon containing 700 bags of groundnut to B. Unknown to A, 109 bags had been stolen at the time of sale. Therefore, A made a delivery of 591 bags. Held, the sale was void.
The contract is void if subsequently the goods have perished and there is no fault on the part of the buyer or the seller in perishing the goods.
Example
A horse was delivered upon trial for 8 days. However, the horse died within 8 days without the fault of buyer or seller. Held, the seller must bear the loss as the contract was void.
However, the parties to the contract may provide otherwise also.
Generally, at the time of sale, the seller makes some representations, statements or stipulations for the praise of his goods. Some of the representations are in nature of opinion, while others are in nature of facts. The representation as to the fact which becomes a part of the contract of sale is called as stipulation. The stipulation may be a condition or warranty depending upon its importance in relation to the contract. The stipulation which is essential to the main purpose of a contract is known as condition. The breach of condition gives the aggrieved party the right to terminate the contract.
The stipulation which is collateral to the main purpose of the contract is warranty. The breach of warranty gives rise to the aggrieved party the right to claim the damages but the contract cannot be terminated. The conditions and warranties may be expressed or implied.
The express conditions and warranties are those which the parties agree expressly, i.e., orally or in writing. The implied conditions are those which are implied by the law in the absence of any agreement to the contrary. The conditions and warranties in the contract of sale constitute stipulation with the reference to goods. In the case of a conflict between the express conditions and the implied conditions, express conditions shall prevail.
The breach of condition in a contract of sale of goods gives right to cancel the contract. If the party has suffered from any loss, he can also claim compensation for the breach of condition. But the breach of warranty in a contract of sale of goods gives the right to claim the damages only. However, the liability for the implied conditions and warranties may be excluded by the parties in the following situations:
According to the Section 13 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, a breach of condition may be treated as a breach of warranty in the following circumstances:
Following are the implied conditions which are contained in the Sales of Goods Act:
There is an implied condition on the part of the seller that:
If the title of a seller turns out to be defective, the buyer must return the goods to the true owner and recover the price from the seller.
Where the goods are sold by description, there is an implied condition that the goods shall correspond to the description. If later on, the buyer finds that the goods are not as per description, he may reject the goods and claim a refund of the price.
Example
A machine was sold. The buyer has not seen the machine but the seller described it as a new one. However, it was found to be a very old one. Held, the machine was not according to the description.
Where the goods are sold by the sample, followings are the implied conditions:
If the sale is by sample as well as description, both the conditions shall be satisfied. The goods must correspond with the sample as well as the description.
Example
A agreed to sell to C some oil described as ‘Foreign refined oil’ and warranted only equal to sample. The goods supplied were equal to sample but contained a mixture of hemp oil. Held, C could reject the goods.
Where the buyer, expressly or impliedly, tells the seller the particular purpose for which he needs the goods and relies on the skill or judgment of the seller, there is an implied condition that the goods shall be reasonably fit for such a purpose. It is not necessary that the purpose should be expressed in words. The purpose can also be ascertained from the nature or description of the goods.
When the article can be used only for one particular purpose, the buyer need not to inform the seller the purpose for which the goods are required.
Example
A purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. While the bottle was being used by A’s wife, it burst and injured A’s wife. Held, the seller was liable for damages as the bottle was not fit for the purpose for which it was meant. (Priest versus Last)
13.12.5.1 Exceptions to the Implied Condition as to Quality or Fitness ‘The conditions as to the quality or fitness’ will not apply. If the buyer is suffering from an abnormality, which renders the goods unsuitable for a particular purpose and the buyer does not inform the seller about that abnormality.
Example
A purchased a coat. He had abnormally sensitive skin. By wearing the coat, he got a skin complaint. Held, there was no breach of condition as he had not disclosed the abnormality of his skin.
Where the goods can be used for a number of purposes, the buyer should inform the particular purpose for which such goods were required. If he does not disclose, there is no such condition of the quality or fitness.
There is an implied condition that the goods shall be of merchantable quality, where the goods are bought by description from a seller who deals in the goods of that description.
‘Merchantability’ means that there is no defect in the goods, which renders them unfit for sale. Thus, a watch that will not keep time and a pen that will not write cannot be regarded as merchantable. In a contract for the sale of goods, the condition as to merchantability applies where the goods are bought by description or where the goods are sold under the trade mark.
Example
A radio set was sold to a layman. The set was defective. It did not work in spite of repairs. Held, the buyer could return the set and claim refund.
In the case of eatables and food-stuff, there is an implied condition that the goods shall be wholesome, i.e., free from any defect which renders them unfit for human consumption. The implied condition as to the wholesomeness of the goods is applicable for every type of goods in the nature of food.
Example
A purchased milk from B, a milk dealer. The milk contained typhoid germs. A’s wife on taking the milk got infected and died. Held, A was entitled to get damages. (Frost vs Aylesbury Dairy Co. Ltd.)
For the purpose of making uniform for the employees, Bansi Bhaiya bought dark blue coloured cloth from Vivek but did not disclose to the seller the purpose of the said purchase. When uniforms were prepared and used by the employees, the cloth was found unfit. However, there was an evidence that the cloth was fit for caps, boots and carriage lining. Advise Bansi Bhaiya whether he is entitled to have any remedy under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930?
A contracts to sell B, by showing sample, certain quantity of rape-seed oil described as ‘foreign refined rape-seed-oil’. The oil when delivered, matches with the sample but is not foreign refined rape-seed oil. Referring to the provisions of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, advise the remedy, if any, available to B.
Mr. Amit was shopping in a self-service Super market. He picked up a bottle of cold drink from a shelf. While he was examining the bottle, it exploded in his hand and injured him. He files a suit for damages against the owner of the market on the ground of breach of condition. Decide, under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, whether Mr. Amit would succeed in his claim?
Jolly bought a second hand car from Yogesh for ₹ 85,000 and paid for it. After Jolly had used the car for six months, he was deprived of it because Yogesh had no title to it. Can Jolly recover the price of the car from Yogesh? Advise Jolly.
A told B, a car dealer, that he wanted to purchase a car ‘suitable for touring purposes’, B suggested that a ‘Maruti Alto’ car would be fit for the purpose. Relying upon his statement, A bought a ‘Alto’ car which turned out to be unfit for touring purposes. What remedy is available to Mr. A?
Following are the implied warranties which are contained in the Sales of Goods Act:
In the absence to any contract showing a contrary intention, there is an implied warranty that the buyer shall have and enjoy the quiet possession of the goods. If the buyer is disturbed in the enjoyment of the goods, he can claim the damages from the seller.
Unless the circumstances of the case are such as to show a contrary intention, there is an implied warranty that the goods shall be free from any charge or encumbrance in favour of any party not declared to the buyer before or at the time contract is made. However, there will not be any such warranty if the charge is declared to the buyer at the time of sale.
An implied warranty, as to the quality or fitness for a particular purpose, may be annexed by the usage of trade.
In case of the sale of dangerous goods, the seller is under an obligation to warn the buyer about the probable danger. A failure to do so, will make the seller liable to pay the damages.
Example
A sold a tin of a disinfectant to B, knowing that it was likely to be dangerous to B if opened without special care. B opened the tin, whereupon the disinfectant powder went into her eyes causing an injury. Held, A was liable in damages to B as he failed to warn B of the probable danger.
Section 13 of the act provides for the situations in which the condition can be treated as a warranty. These are:
Aman borrows ₹ 200 from Bhuvan against the security of his wrist-watch. After a week’s time, Aman obtains the watch from Bhuvan on some pretext and then sells the same watch to Chandan, an innocent buyer, who has no knowledge about Bhuvan’s charge on the watch. Subsequently, Bhuvan disturbs Chandan’s possession and gets the payment of ₹ 200 from him. Now Chandan files a suit against Aman for the recovery of ₹ 200 from him. Will Chandan succeed? Give reasons.
Matter | Condition | Warranty |
---|---|---|
Stipulation | The condition is a stipulation essential to the main purpose of the contract. | The warranty is collateral (subsidiary) to the main purpose of the contract. |
If breach? | The buyer has the right to cancel a contract on the breach of conditions. | The buyer has no right to cancel the contract on the breach of warranty. The buyer can claim the damages. |
Treatment | The breach of condition may be treated as the breach of warranty. | The breach of warranty cannot be treated as the breach of condition. |
‘Caveat Emptor’ is a Latin word. It means ‘let the buyer beware.’ It is the buyer’s duty to select the goods of his requirement and the seller is not bound to supply the goods which shall be fit for any particular purpose of the buyer. It suggests that the buyer, while purchasing the goods, must act with a ‘third eye and ear,’ i.e.:
If the buyer selects the goods as per his requirement and the goods are not satisfying his requirement, he cannot claim anything against the seller. However, in the following exceptions, the Doctrine of caveat emptor is not applicable:
A goes to B’s shop and purchases a silk saree, thinking that it is made of Banarsi Silk. The shopkeeper knows that A’s thinking is wrong. He, however, does not correct A’s impression. Later on, when A discovers that the saree is not made of Banarsi-silk he wants to avoid the contract. Would A succeed? Give reasons.
In case of the sale of specific goods, the rules relating to the transfer of ownership are contained in Sections 20–22 of the Sale of Goods Act which may be discussed as under:
The ownership is transferred immediately at the time of making the contract if all the following conditions are satisfied:
Example
A sold to B, 100 bales of cotton lying in his godown. Before the bales could be identified and separated, all the bales were destroyed in fire. Here, the seller is liable for damage because the ownership is not transferred.
If the goods are not ready in the deliverable state at the time of making the contract of sale, the ownership of goods is transferred after the formation of the contract of sale when the following conditions are satisfied:
Example
A certain quantity of oil was purchased by A. The oil was to be filled in tins. B filled up some of the tins and informed A to take the delivery. In the meantime, a fire destroyed the entire quantity of oil. Held, A will bear the loss of the oil which was filled in the tins and the seller must bear the loss of the balance.
If the goods are not weighed or measured at the time of making a contract of sale, the ownership of the goods is transferred after the formation of a contract of sale when the following conditions are satisfied:
Example
A sold 10 kg of wheat. The wheat was to be weighed. Before the wheat was weighed, it was carried away by the flood. Held, the ownership of the wheat was left with the seller and it did not pass to the buyer.
A certain quantity of oil was bought. The oil was to be filled into barrels by the seller and then taken away by the buyer. Some barrels were filled in the presence of the buyer but before the remainders could be filled, a fire broke out and the entire quantity of oil was destroyed. State the liabilities of the buyer and the seller.
In the case of the unascertained goods, when both the parties came to know which particular goods shall be delivered, the ownership is transferred. Following conditions must be satisfied to transfer the ownership:
Example
20 bags of sugar out of a bulk were agreed to be sold. 4 bags of sugar were filled up and taken away by the buyer. Subsequently, the seller filled up 16 bags and informed the buyer. The buyer replied that he will take the delivery as soon as possible. However, before the buyer could take their delivery, the goods were lost. Held, the buyer was responsible as the ownership had passed to the buyer.
The term ‘sale on approval’ basis may be defined as the sale in which the buyer may return the goods within a reasonable time. This is also known as ‘sale on return’ basis. It means the buyer has the option either to return or retain the goods. Here, the property in goods does not pass from the seller to the buyer:
Case | When Ownership Transferred |
---|---|
When the buyer gives his approval or acceptance. | The approval or acceptance is communicated to the seller. |
When the buyer does some act adopting the transaction. | When the act of adoption is done. |
When the buyer fails to return the goods. (a) If the time fixed for the return of goods. (b) If no time is fixed. |
The ownership of the goods transferred on the expiry of the fixed time. The ownership of the goods transferred on the expiry of a reasonable time. |
Example
A certain jewellery was delivered to a buyer on sale or return basis. The buyer pledged the jewellery. Held, the buyer had adopted the transaction and as such the property had passed and the seller could not recover the jewellery from the Pawnee.
Where the railway receipt or the bill of lading is in the name of the buyer but is sent through the bank with the instructions that the same is to be delivered against the acceptance of the bill or payment of the price, the property in the goods shall not pass until the buyer makes a payment to the bank and obtain the documents.
With a view to boost the sales Hanuman Automobiles sells a motorcar to Mr. A on trial basis for a period of three days with a condition that if Mr. A is not satisfied with the performance of the car, he can return back the car. However, the car was destroyed in a fire accident at the place of Mr. A before the expiry of three days. Decide whether Mr. A is liable for the loss suffered.
Mr. S agreed to purchase 100 bales of cotton from V, out of his large stock and sent his men to take the delivery of the goods. They could pack only 60 bales. Later on, there was an accidental fire and the entire stock was destroyed including 60 bales that were already packed. Referring to the provisions of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, explain as to who will bear the loss and to what extent?
A delivers his watch to B on ‘sale or return’ basis. B delivers the same watch to C on ‘sale or return’ basis. C delivers it to D on ‘sale or return’ basis and D delivers the same watch to E on ‘sale or return’ basis. While in the possession of E, the watch is damaged. Who will bear the loss? Give reasons.
Asha delivers some furniture to Bipasha on ‘sale or return’ basis. Bipasha then delivers the same furniture to Chitra and Chitra further delivers it to Divya on similar basis. Before Divya could give her acceptance, the furniture is suddenly destroyed by fire. Who is to bear the loss of furniture? Give reasons.
Sanjay delivers some goods to Tarun on the ‘sale or return’ basis for seven days. State the legal position in each of the following different situations:
The general rule is that risk passes with the ownership. We can say that risk and ownership go together. However, express agreement between the parties may provide otherwise. It means risk and property may be separated by the term in agreement. The possession of goods is immaterial for the risk. When the delivery is delayed because of the fault of any party, he is liable for risk.
Sometimes the risk is based upon the custom or the usage of trade. Where the delivery of the goods has been delayed due to the fault of buyer/seller, the goods are at the risk of the party in fault.
Aman contracted to erect machinery on Sapan’s premises on the condition that the price shall be paid on the completion of work. During the progress of work, the premises and machinery were destroyed by an accidental fire. Referring to the provisions of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, decide whether the parties are bound to perform their promises and can Aman recover the price of the work actually done?
The rules regarding the delivery of the goods are contained in Sections 32–39 of the sales of Goods Act which may be discussed as under:
The general rule suggests that the delivery of the goods and the payment of the price are concurrent conditions. However, the parties may provide otherwise. It means if the contract of sale provides that the payment will be made in future or the payment will be made in instalments, it is a valid contract. The payment of price and the transfer of ownership has nothing to do with each other.
It is the seller’s duty to be ready and willing to deliver the goods to the buyer. But he is not bound to deliver the goods, unless the buyer makes a demand for the delivery of the goods.
If the buyer fails to demand the delivery of goods, the seller is not liable for breach. The buyer must demand the delivery within a reasonable time. However, the contract may provide otherwise.
13.20.3.1 Actual Delivery It is the delivery where the goods are handed over to the buyer or his authorized agent. It means the goods are physically put in possession of the buyer.
13.20.3.2 Symbolic Delivery When the goods are not physically delivered to the buyer but some symbol of the real possession or control over the goods is handed over to the buyer. The symbolic delivery of goods is also known as attornment. The transfer of documents of title to the goods, i.e., the railway receipts, bill of lading and delivery orders are instances of symbolic delivery. Such delivery is made when the goods are bulky.
Example
Delivery of key of car.
13.20.3.3 Constructive Delivery Where the third party who is in possession of goods acknowledges to hold the goods on behalf of the buyer is known as constructive delivery.
Example
A sells 100 bags of cement lying in B’s godown. B agrees to hold the 100 bags of cement on behalf of A.
Unless otherwise agreed anything contrary, the seller is required to make the delivery of goods at the place shown in the table below:
Situation | Place Where Goods are to be Delivered |
---|---|
If the contract specified the place of delivery. | At the place specified. |
Contract had not specified the place of delivery
|
At a place at which the goods are at the time of sale. |
|
At a place at which the goods are at the time of agreement of sale. At a place at which the goods are manufactured or produced. |
If the contract specified the time of delivery, the goods shall be delivered within such time. If no time is specified in the contract as to the time of the delivery of goods, it should be delivered within a reasonable time. A reasonable time is question of the fact depending upon the facts and circumstances of each particular case.
All the expenses of making the delivery of goods shall be paid by the seller unless, otherwise, agreed and all the expenses of receiving the goods are paid by the buyer. However, the seller and the buyer may agree otherwise.
The delivery of wrong quantity means the seller has delivered the goods in excess or short.
If the seller has delivered excess quantity, the buyer has the following options:
If the seller has delivered a short quantity, the buyer has the following options:
The right to reject the goods in excess of the contract does not apply where the variation is negligible.
Further, the right to reject the goods is not similar to the right to cancel the contract. If the buyer rejects the goods (either because they are less than or in excess of the quantity contracted for), the seller has a right to tender again the contract quantity and the buyer is bound to accept the same.
The buyer is not bound to return the rejected goods. It is sufficient if the buyer intimates the seller that he refuses to accept the goods.
The seller is bound to deliver the goods of exact quality–quantity otherwise the buyer may:
The buyer is not bound to accept the goods delivered in instalment. The delivery by instalment is not valid except if the contract provides so or the buyer accepts the delivery in instalment.
In every contract for Sale of Goods, the buyer has the right to examine the goods unless, otherwise, agreed in the contract.
The delivery to the carrier or the wharfinger amounts as the delivery to the buyer if the following conditions satisfy:
If the seller makes a valid delivery of the goods, the buyer has the following duties:
The delivery of goods should be voluntary and lawful. The delivery of goods has the effect of putting the goods in the buyer’s possession. The delivery does not mean the acceptance of goods. The buyer is deemed to have accepted the goods under the following circumstances:
If the buyer wrongfully refuses to take the delivery of goods, he is liable for the damages and expenses like the storage cost and the transportation cost to the seller.
Where the goods are sent by the sea route, the seller shall give a notice to the buyer to insure the goods, otherwise he will be liable for a loss.
Amit sells to Sachin a specific horse which is to be delivered to Sachin the next week. Sachin is to pay the price on delivery. In the next week, Sachin was ready to pay the price for the horse but Amit was not in a position to deliver the horse to Sachin. Amit asks Sachin to take delivery of the horse after another week and pay the price then. During the second week, the horse dies before it is delivered and paid for. Who shall bear the loss? Explain.
The seller to whom the full price of the goods sold has not been paid the price is known as an unpaid seller. A seller of goods is deemed to be unpaid in the following cases:
However, the seller is not an unpaid seller if the buyer has tendered the price and the seller has refused to accept it.
Example
Z sells goods worth ₹ 50,000 to B on credit of five months. After five months, B did not pay the price. Z shall be regarded as an unpaid seller.
An unpaid seller has the right against the goods as well as against the the buyer:
Where the ownership of the goods is transferred, the seller has the following rights available to him, based upon the circumstances which can be discussed as under:
Where the ownership is not transferred to the buyer, the seller has the right to withhold the delivery of goods. In case where the ownership is not transferred to the buyer, the seller has no other right available to him.
An unpaid seller has the following rights available against the defaulting buyer:
Lien means the right to retain the possession of goods until the full price is received. The right of lien can be exercised on the goods. The seller can exercise his right of lien on the following two conditions:
If the buyer has paid a part of the price, he cannot compel the seller to release the goods in proportion to the price paid. If the buyer becomes insolvent, the lien can be exercised by the unpaid seller. In the following circumstances, the unpaid seller’s lien is lost:
The right of stoppage in transit is an extension of the right of lien. The right of lien is a right to retain the possession, whereas the right of stoppage in transit is a right to regain the possession. The right of stoppage in transit can be exercised if the goods are in transit and the buyer has become insolvent in the meantime. The right of stoppage in transit can be exercise by the unpaid seller where he has lost his right of lien. The goods in transit can be stopped for the price. The unpaid seller has made a part delivery of the goods, he may exercise his right of stoppage in transit on the remaining part of the goods for the price.
A carrier may hold the goods in three capacities:
13.24.1.1 As Seller’s Agent In this case, the seller has lien on the goods, so the question of the right of stoppage in transit does not arise.
13.24.1.2 As Buyer’s Agent In this case, the seller cannot exercise the right of stoppage in transit.
13.24.1.3 In an Independent Capacity In this case, the seller can exercise the right of stoppage in transit.
The goods are deemed to be in course of transit from the time they are delivered to a carrier for the purpose of transmission to the buyer until the buyer or his agent takes their delivery.
The goods are in transit even if the buyer asks the carrier to take them to some other destination, until they are delivered to the buyer at some other destination.
If the goods are rejected by the buyer and the goods are in the possession of the carrier, the transit is not at an end, even if the seller has also refused to take them back.
The right of stoppage of goods in transit can be exercise either:
Where the unpaid seller exercises his right of stoppage in transit and regains the possession of goods his right of lien is revived.
Ram sells 200 bales of cloth to Shyam and sends 100 bales by lorry and 100 bales by Railway. Shyam receives the delivery of 100 bales sent by lorry but before he receives the delivery of the bales sent by railway, he becomes bankrupt. Ram, who is still unpaid, stops the goods in transit. The official receiver, on Shyam’s insolvency claims the goods. Decide the case with reference to the provisions of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930.
A, who is an agent of a buyer, had obtained the goods from the Railway organization and loaded the goods on his truck. In the meantime, the Railway organization received a notice from B, a seller, for stopping the goods in transit as the buyer had become insolvent. Referring to the provisions of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, decide whether the Railway organization can stop the goods in transit as instructed by the seller?
If the ownership of the goods is transferred to the buyer but the price is not paid and the goods are in possession of the seller, he can exercise the right of resale. In case of perishable goods, the unpaid seller can resale the goods if the buyer fails to pay the price within a reasonable time. The seller is not required to give notice of the re-sale in the case of perishable goods.
In case of the non-perishable goods, the unpaid seller can resell the goods if he has exercised his right of lien or stoppage of goods in transit. In the case of non-perishable goods, the seller is required to give a notice to the buyer to pay the price within a reasonable time and the buyer fails to pay the price. The seller can exercise his right of the re-sale of the goods when he expressly reserves this right. In such case, no separate notice is given.
Following will be the effects of the resale of goods:
Rights | In Case of Resale After Notice | In Case of Resale Without Notice |
---|---|---|
The unpaid seller’s right to recover the loss on sale. | Yes, the loss can be recovered. | No, the-loss cannot be recovered. |
The original buyer’s right to recover the profit on goods. | No, the profit cannot be recovered. | The profit can be recovered. |
New buyer’s right to acquire good title. | Acquire title. | Acquire title. |
The right to withhold the delivery of goods means the seller refuses to deliver the goods to the buyer. The following conditions must be satisfied to exercise the right to withhold the delivery of goods:
The right to withhold the delivery of goods is in addition to the other remedies available to the seller.
Suraj sold his car to Sohan for ₹ 75,000. After inspection and satisfaction, Sohan paid ₹ 25,000 and took possession of the car and promised to pay the remaining amount within a month. Later on, Sohan refuses to give the remaining amount on the ground that the car was not in a good condition. Advise Suraj as to what remedy is available to him against Sohan.
A carrier means a transporter or a bailee to whom the goods are delivered by the seller for transportation to the buyer. When the goods are delivered to a carrier, it is deemed delivery of goods to the buyer if the following conditions are satisfied:
The buyer has the following remedies against the seller:
The buyer is ready and willing to take the delivery of goods but the seller wrongfully neglects or refuses the delivery of goods, the buyer may sue the seller for the damage for non-delivery.
Where the seller’s wrongful refusal to deliver specific or ascertained goods is seen, the court may direct a specific performance order.
If there is breach of warranty, the buyer may claim the damages from the seller. The buyer may deduct the amount of damage from the price payable if the price is not paid. The buyer may recover the damages if the price is paid.
If the seller declares his intention of the non-delivery of goods, the buyer may repudiate the contract and immediately sue for damages.
In the absence of any contract to the contrary, no interest shall be payable by the buyer on the delay payment. If there is no such agreement the seller may give notice to the buyer of his intention to charge interest on the delayed payment.
The general rule is expressed by the maxim ‘Namo dat quod non habet’ which means no one can give what he does not himself possess. If the seller’s title is defective then the buyer’s title will be defective. Alternatively, we can say that the seller cannot give a better title to the buyer than he himself has.
Following are exception to the above general rule:
The agent of the seller can transfer the title if the following conditions are satisfied:
Example
A entrusted his car to a mercantile agent to receive the offers and not to sell. A also delivered signed documents to the agent. On the basis of these documents, the agent pretended to the buyer that he had the authority to sell the car and thus, the car was sold. Held, the owner was stopped from denying the buyer’s title.
One of the joint owners can sell the goods if the following conditions are satisfied:
Example
A and B jointly purchased a car. The car was in the possession of A with the consent of B. Later on, A sold the car to an innocent purchaser. The purchaser will get a good title.
Example
A purchased a watch from B under fraud. A sold the watch to C who bought it in good faith. C gets good title.
The seller may sell the goods in possession after sale if the following conditions are satisfied:
Example
A sells certain goods to B and promises to deliver the goods the next day. Before the delivery, A sells and delivers the goods to C who buys them in good faith and without notice of the prior sale to B. C gets a good title to the goods, notwithstanding that the property had, before he purchased, passed to B.
This is the sale by the unpaid seller after the exercise of his right of lien or the right of stoppage of goods in transit.
If the owner of the goods has declared insolvent and his goods are sold by the official receiver or assignee or liquidator. The liquidator has the authority to sell the goods as per the court order.
If the owner cannot be found or found but refuses to pay the lawful charges to the finder.
The finder of goods can sell the goods when the goods are perishable in nature or in danger without finding the true owner of goods to save the goods from loss.
The finder of the goods can sell the goods if the lawful charges of the finder amount as two-third of its original value.
If there is a default on the part of payment of price or performance within time after serving the notice of a reasonable time, the pawnee or pledge can sell the goods in public auction to recover his due.
J the owner of a Fiat car wants to sell his car. For this purpose he hand over the car to P, a mercantile agent for sale at a price not less than ₹ 50,000. The agent sells the car for ₹ 40,000 to A who buys the car in good faith and without notice of any fraud. P misappropriated the money also. J sues A to recover the Car. Decide given reasons whether J would succeed.
A, B and C were joint owners of a truck and the possession of the said truck was with B. X purchased the truck from B without knowing that A and C were also owners of the truck. Decide in the light of provisions of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, whether the sale between B and X is valid or not?
B buys goods from A on payment but leaves the goods in the possession of A. A then pledges the goods to C who has no notice of the sale to B. State whether the pledge is valid and whether C can enforce it. Decide with reference to the provisions of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930.
It means public sale. The seller invites the interested parties by advertisement to offer the price (i.e., bid). The seller may hire the service of the auctioneer. An auctioneer is an agent of the seller. The advertisement of the auction sale is not an offer but an invitation to make an offer and therefore if an auction sale is not held on the appointed day, the bidder cannot sue the auctioneer.
Every bid amounts as an offer and the acceptance is given by the auctioneer by some usual mode of acceptance e.g., fall of hammer, going-going-gone or one-two-three.
The auction sale starts with the placing of bids. The auctioneer accepts the highest bids but he may accept the lower bid without giving reason. When the bid is accepted, a valid contract is formed.
A bid once made can be withdrawn before the fall of hammer even if expressly prohibit. The seller can bid at an auction sale if the bidders are informed of the fact (Pretended bidding). If the seller makes use of the pretended bidding to raise the price, the sale is voidable at the option of the buyer. The bid is said to be pretended when it is made by the seller or someone on his behalf. Only one person can be appointed for bidding.
They auctioneer may set a reserve price or upset price. The bid lower than which is invalid.
In the case of Knockout agreement, the buyers join their hands to eliminate competition among themselves at an auction sale. They agree that they will not raise the bid against each other and only one of them will bid at the auction. When the goods have been purchased, they will share the profit. Prima facie, a knockout agreement is not illegal. However, if the intention of the parties to the agreement is to defraud a third party, this will be illegal.
Damping is an act by which an intending bidder is discouraged from bidding. Damping is an illegal. It includes:
The damping empowers the auctioneer to withdraw the property from the auction.
It includes the following three categories of contracts:
It means ‘cost, insurance and freight’. Here the price of goods includes the cost of goods, insurance and freight expenses. In the CIF contract, the buyer pays the insurance and freight expenses.
The essential of the CIF contract is that the seller shall deliver the shipping documents to the buyer usually through the bank. If the seller fails to deliver the documents within a reasonable time, he is liable for breach of contract.
The ownership of goods is transferred to the buyer when he pays the price of the goods while receiving the shipping documents. If the buyer refuses to pay the price, the seller can claim the damages for the breach of contract.
It means free on board. Here, the seller is required to put the goods on the board of ship at his expenses. The buyer is liable for all the expenses and risk, once goods are loaded on the ship. The ownership of goods is transferred to the buyer as soon as the goods are loaded to the ship.
It means the contract in which the seller has to deliver the goods to the buyer at the port of destination. All the freight charges and risks during the voyage for the goods remain with the seller. The ownership of the goods is transferred to the buyer when the goods are actually delivered at the port of destination.
Commissioner of Sales Tax vs M. P. State Electricity Board (1970)
The electricity is goods since it is capable of being transferred, transmitted, delivered, stored and possessed.
Jabalpur Cable Network (P) Ltd vs ESPN Software Ind (P) Ltd (1999)
The electricity signals like cable tv signals is goods.
SBI vs Neela Naik (2000)
The bank fixed deposit receipt is goods.
H. Anurag vs Govt. of Tamil Nadu (1986)
The lottery Tickets are goods and not actionable claims.
Grant vs Australian Knitting Mills Ltd (1936)
In case of undergarments, if they are purchased, there is an implied condition that they shall not contain any chemicals which would cause harm to skin.
State of Gujrat vs Raman Lal and Co.
The distribution of goods among the partners on account of dissolution of the firm does not amount to the sale of goods because they cannot be both sellers and buyers.
K. J. Abraham vs Asst. STO (1960)
Animals and birds in captivity are goods.
R. D. Goyal vs Reliance Industries Ltd (2003)
After the allotment shares are goods.
Damodar Valley Corp. vs State of Bihar (1961)
In the case of hire-purchase, ‘sale’ takes place only when the purchaser exercises the option to purchase after paying all the agreed amount. Till then it is bailment.
Belsize Motor Supply Co. vs Cox (1914)
If a person had obtained goods on hire-purchase or lease, he has the option to buy the goods. In such a case, he has neither bought nor agreed to buy goods. Hence, he has no right to pledge or otherwise dispose of the goods. He cannot pass a better title to the third person and the owner can claim back the possession of goods.
Consolidated Coffee Ltd vs Coffee Board (1980)
The Property in auction sale passes to the purchaser on the acceptance of bid.
Zilla Parishad vs Udi Veer Singh (1989)
If the bidder withdraws the offer before acceptance, the security deposit paid by him cannot be forfeited.
Suresh Kumar Rajendra Kumar vs Assan Koya (1990)
The goods cannot be rejected by the buyer on account of the minor difference in the quantity.
The delivery of goods to the carrier is prima facie delivery of goods to the buyer.
Venkatu Lallaya vs Ramaswami and Co. (1964)
The contract of sale may provide for the manner in which the price is to be fixed.
Geddling vs Marsh (1920)
The implied condition as to fitness for the purpose goods also applies to the containers in which the goods are packed.
Philip Head and Sons Ltd vs Showfronts Ltd (1970)
When there is a contract for the sale of specific goods not in deliverable state, the property does not pass until it is put in a deliverable state and the buyer has notice of it.
Lacis vs Cashmarts (1964)
In a self service supermarket where the goods are picked up by the customers from the shelves and their prices are paid at the counter, no contract of sale is made until the price is actually paid and the property passes after the price is paid at the counter.
Define the goods. Explain it with suitable examples.
(Ref. Para-13.2)
Which documents are included under the document of title?
(Ref. Para-13.2)
Explain the concept of property with reference to goods.
(Ref. Para-13.2)
State briefly the essential elements of a contract of sale under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930.
(Ref. Para-13.3)
How is a contract of sale made?
(Ref. Para-13.3)
Distinguish between a sale and an agreement to sell.
(Ref. Para-13.4)
In what ways does a sale differ from hire-purchase?
(Ref. Para-13.5)
Distinguish between a sale and a bailment.
(Ref. Para-13.6)
The contract for work and skill are not included in the Sales of Goods Act. Explain.
(Ref. Para-13.7)
What are the main features of the contract for work and skill?
(Ref. Para-13.7)
Define goods. Explain in brief the meaning of the existing goods and future goods.
(Ref. Para-13.8)
How is the price in the contract of sale of goods ascertained?
(Ref. Para-13.9)
What do you understand by Goods? What are the rules in case the goods perish before and after making contract of sale of goods?
(Ref. Para-13.2,13.10)
What do you understand by the conditions and warranties of a contract of the sale of goods?
(Ref. Para-13.11)
What are the circumstances when a condition can be treated as warranty?
(Ref. Para-13.11)
What are the implied warranties and conditions in a contract of sale of goods?
(Ref. Para-13.12,13.13)
What are the implied warranties in a contract of sale under the Sales of Goods Act, 1930?
(Ref. Para-13.13)
Point out the difference between the conditions and warranties under the Sales of Goods Act, 1930.
(Ref. Para-13.14)
What do you understand by ‘caveat emptor’ under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930? What are the exceptions to this rule?
(Ref. Para-13.15)
In the contract of sale, when does the property in goods passes on to the buyer?
(Ref. Para-13.16, 13.17,13.18)
When is the ownership transferred in the case of goods sent on approval?
(Ref. Para-13.18)
How does the risk pass in the contract for Sale of Goods Act?
(Ref. Para-13.19)
Risk always passes with ownership. Comment.
(Ref. Para-13.19)
What are the rules relating to the delivery of the goods in a contract of sale of goods?
(Ref. Para-13.20)
Explain the modes of the delivery of goods.
(Ref. Para-13.20)
The delivery of goods does not mean an acceptance of goods. Comment.
(Ref. Para-13.20)
Who is an unpaid seller? What are his rights against the goods?
(Ref. Para-13.21)
What types of suits can be preferred by the seller against the buyer in case of a breach of contract of sale?
(Ref. Para-13.22)
Write a short note on an unpaid seller’s lien.
(Ref. Para-13.23)
Write a short note on the unpaid seller’s right of the stoppage of goods in transit.
(Ref. Para-13.24)
Write a short note on the right of the unpaid seller to re-sell the goods.
(Ref. Para-13.25)
What do you understand by the right to withhold the delivery of goods?
(Ref. Para-13.26)
Write a short note on the delivery to carrier.
(Ref. Para-13.27)
What type of remedies are available to the buyer against the seller?
(Ref. Para-13.28)
‘Nemo dat quod non habet’ explain. What are its exceptions?
(Ref. Para-13.29)
What are the provisions relating to the auction sale?
(Ref. Para-13.30)
Write a short note on the CIF, FOB and Ex-ship contract.
(Ref. Para-13.31)