Discharge of a contract means termination of the contractual relations between the parties to the contract. The contract may be discharged in the following six modes as shown in Figure 7.1.
A contract can be discharged by performance in any of the following ways.
It means the parties to contract have performed their respective promises under the contract.
It means the promisor has made an offer of the performance of promise but it has not been accepted by the promisee.
A contract can be discharged by mutual agreement in any of the following ways.
The novation means a new contract is entered into in consideration of the old contract. The new contract is entered into between the same parties or the new parties. The novation is valid when all the parties must consent it. The new contract must be valid and enforceable, otherwise the old contract will continue valid.
Example
A owed ₹ 100 to B, under contract. B owed ₹ 100 to C. It was agreed among A, B and C that A would pay ₹ 100 to C.
An alteration of a contract means a change in one or more terms of the contract with the mutual consent of the parties. The alteration discharges the original contract and creates a new contract. However, the parties to the new contract remain the same. In case of alteration of the contract, the old terms and conditions need not to be performed while the new terms and conditions must be performed.
Example
A agreed with B to supply 100 TV sets at a certain price by the end of October. Subsequently, A and B mutually agree that the supply be made by the end of November. This is an altercation in the terms of the contract by consent of both the parties.
The rescission of a contract means the cancellation of the contract by one or all the parties to contract. It may take place:
No partial rescission. The party may rescind the entire contract. The rescission of the contract in part is not possible. Just as a proposal has to be communicated, the rescission should also be communicated. A rescission may be revoked in the same manner as a proposal is revoked.
The remission means the acceptance of a lesser consideration than what is agreed under the contract. It takes place when the promisee:
Example
A owes B ₹ 5000. A pays ₹ 2000 to B and B accepts the amount in satisfaction of the whole debt. The whole debt is discharged.
It may be noted that when a party accepts a lesser sum in satisfaction of a larger sum due under the contract it is called ‘accord and satisfaction’ in the English Law. The promisee accepts a lesser sum than what is due under the contract is known as ‘Accord’ and the actual payment is the satisfaction. This is a valid contract.
It means the abandonment (i.e., giving up) of right by the party under the contract. No consideration is necessary for the waiver.
Example
A promises to supply goods to Y. Later on, Y exempts A from carrying out the promise. It amount as waiver of right of performance on part of Y.
The conversion of the inferior right into superior right is called as merger. It is also called as vesting of rights and liabilities in the same person.
Example
A person holds property under lease, purchases the property. On purchase, his lease agreement is discharged.
A took a house on rent from B. During tenancy, A purchases that house. Now does he requires to pay the rent? Why?
Matter | Novation | Alteration |
---|---|---|
Meaning | It means a new contract is entered into in the place of the old contract. | Alteration means a change in one or more terms of the contract with the consent of all the parties. |
Different Parties | Novation may involve different parties. | In the case of alteration, parties are the same. |
Change in terms and Conditions | Novation may or may not involve changes in the terms and conditions. Generally, novation includes alteration. | Alteration always requires changes in one or more terms and conditions of the contract. |
Matter | Rescission | Alteration |
---|---|---|
Meaning | It means cancellation of the contract. | It means change in one or more terms of the contract with the consent of all the parties. |
Mutual consent | Novation takes place with the mutual consent or by aggrieved party or a party whose consent is not free. | Alteration cannot take place without mutual consent. |
Effect | On cancellation, the contract comes to an end. | The parties are legally bound to each other under the altered contract. |
Sometimes, the performance of a contract is impossible. In such a case, the contract is discharged. This is based on the principle that law does not recognize what is impossible. The impossibility of performance may be of two types, namely (a) the initial impossibility and (b) the subsequent impossibility.
It means impossibility exists at the time of making a contract. The initial impossibility may be (i) known or (ii) unknown to the parties at the time of making the agreement.
It means one or both the parties have a knowledge that a promise is impossible to perform even though they enter into an agreement.
Example
A agrees with B to bring a dead man to life. It is known to the parties at the time of making the agreement that the performance is impossible. The agreement is void ab initio.
It means both the parties genuinely believe that the performance of a promise is possible but it is impossible to perform. It can also be said here that there is a bilateral mistake of parties.
Example
A agrees to sell certain goods to B, supposed to be on their way from Mumbai to Kolkata in a certain ship. Unknown to both the parties, the ship had already sunk in the deep sea, and the goods ceased to exist at the time of contract. The contract becomes void when the impossibility of performance is discovered.
The contract becomes void on account of the subsequent impossibility only if the following conditions are satisfied.
Example
A and B contract to marry each other. Before the time fixed for the marriage, A becomes mad. The contract becomes void.
A, a Hindu, who was already married, contracts to marry B, a Hindu girl. Is it a valid contract? Why?
It is also known as the doctrine of frustration under the English law. In the following cases, the contract is discharged on the ground of the supervening impossibility.
The destruction of the subject–matter after a contract is made without the fault of any party discharge the contract. But if the destruction of the subject matter is due to the fault of any party, he is liable for the damage to the other party.
Example
A music hall and a garden was let out by A to B for a series of concerts on four different days. The hall was burnt-down before the date of the first concert. Held, the contract became void by the supervening impossibility.
Incapacity or death of the promisor and the contract is for personal service or skill. The contracts involving the use of personal skill or ability of the promisor are discharged on the illness, death, or incapacity of the promisor.
Example
A piano player agreed to perform a concert on a particular day. She was not able to give her performance due to her illness. Held, the contract was discharged due to her illness.
Sometimes, certain circumstances arise subsequent to the formation of a contract, which makes the performance of the contract impossible, as contemplated by the parties. In such circumstances, the contract is discharged.
Example
A agreed to sell his land to B. Subsequently, the land was acquired by the government. Held, the contract was discharged.
The pending contract at the time of declaration of a war is either suspended or declared void. Generally, the contract at the time of the declaration of a war is void, when the government declares it against the public interest or national interest.
Example
A contracts to take in a cargo for B at a foreign port. A’s government, afterwards, declares a war against the country in which the port is situated. The contract becomes void when war is declared.
A contracts with the Indian Cricket Board to play for IPL-4 at South Africa. A falls ill and is advised by the doctor to rest. What will be the impact on the contract?
In the following cases, the contract is not discharged on the ground of supervening impossibility. Such excuses are not recognized by the law.
When the performance of the contract becomes difficult, the contract is not discharged. Difficulty is not impossibility. A party can perform it with more effort or hardship.
The party is not discharged from the performance on the ground that it will be non-profitable for him to perform the contract.
Example
A agreed to sell to B, dhotis manufactured in a particular mill. The mill got into repairs and so, dhotis did not manufacture. Held, the contract was not frustrated as the stipulation as to delivery did not make the delivery by the mills, a condition precedent. It was a breach of the contract.
If a promisor could not perform the promise because of default of the third party, he cannot make an excuse and claims that it is impossible to perform the promise. The third party’s fault or conduct has nothing to do with the contract. The contract is not discharged because of third party’s default.
Example
A agreed with B to supply certain cloth manufactured by a specified mill. The terms of the agreement stipulated that A could supply goods as soon as they are supplied to him by the mill. The mill failed to supply the goods to A. Held, A was liable to supply as the terms only indicated the process of delivery.
Strikes, riots, or civil disturbances do not discharge the contract. When such an event takes place, the performance of a promise under the contract becomes impossible for the time being. Once a strike is called off or life becomes normal, it is possible to perform the promise.
Example
A agreed to supply certain goods to B which were to be imported from Algeria. The goods could not be imported due to the riots and civil disturbances in that country. Held, A cannot be excused for the non-performance of the contract.
If the performance of the contract becomes impossible due to the act of the omission of a party, it is called as self induced impossibility. In such cases, the contract is not discharged.
The failure of one of the object out of many objects, do not discharge the contract. But, if all the objects of the contract fail, the contract becomes discharged.
A entered into a contract with B for supply of 100 bicycles manufactured by C. C did not manufacture it. Can A discharge from the contract?
A agreed to supply certain goods to B. As a result of an increase in the raw material costs, it is no longer profitable for A to supply them at the agreed rate. A refused to perform the contract on the argument of impossibility. Is argument of A justifiable? Why?
Akhilesh entered into an agreement with Shekhar to deliver him (Shekhar) 5000 bags, to be manufactured in his factory. The bags could not be manufactured because of the strike by the workers, and Akhilesh failed to supply the said bags to Shekhar. Decide whether Akhilesh can be exempted from liability under the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
‘A’ promised to ‘B’ that he would arrange for ‘B’s marriage with his daughter. ‘A’ could not persuade his daughter to marry ‘B.’ ‘B’ sued ‘A’, who pleaded on the ground of impossibility that he is not liable for any damages. Is he liable to B? On what ground?
Every contract and promise under the contract should be performed within a time limit. The contract is discharged, if it is not performed or enforced within a specified period called as the period of limitation.
Example
The period of limitation for recovering the debt is 3 years and 12 years for the recovery of immovable property.
In the following circumstances, the contract is discharged by the operation of law.
The contract that requires personal skill is discharged on the death of the promisors. However, any benefit received before the performance shall be returned by the legal representative of the deceased party.
The conversion of the inferior right into superior right is called as merger. It is also called as vesting of rights and liabilities in the same person.
The insolvent is discharged from all the liabilities on all the contracts, entered into, up to the date of insolvency.
The alteration which changes the nature of the contract is material alteration. If one party makes any material alteration in the terms of the contract without the approval of the other party, the contract comes to an end.
Example
One of the parties without the consent of the other party changes the date of payment or the place of delivery.
It means the failure of a party to fulfill his obligation or promise under the contract. When there is a breach of contract, certain remedy or consequences are available to the aggrieved party. The aggrieved party means a party who is not at a fault.
The aggrieved party is not required to perform his part of the promise. The aggrieved party is having various remedies depending upon the type of breach. The breach of contract is of the following two types:
An actual breach of contract means any party to contract refuses or fails to perform his promise on the due date of performance, or during the performance. The actual breach of contract may take place expressly or impliedly.
Examples
Following are the consequences of the actual breach of contract:
If time is not the essence, the contract is not voidable but the aggrieved party can claim compensation for any loss caused for non-performance.
When any party declares his intention of not performing the contract before the performance is due, it is called as anticipatory breach of contract.
Example
A agrees with B to sell his car on 21 January. Before this date he informs B that he will not sell it. This is an anticipatory breach of contract.
There are two modes of anticipatory breach (a) express repudiation and (b) implied repudiation. The express repudiation means when the party refuses expressly to perform his obligation before the performance due. The implied repudiation means the party acts in such manner that it becomes impossible for him to fulfill his obligation under the contract. In the case of implied repudiation, the party does something which indicates his unwillingness to perform the contract.
Following are the consequence of anticipatory breach.
Here, the damage will be equal to the difference between the contract price and the price as on the date of communication.
Note:
When a contract becomes void, any benefit received under such contract is bound to restore such benefit or to make compensation for such benefit to the person from whom he received it.
A contracted to supply 200 bags of rice to B on 30 December 2010. After supply of 20 bags of rice, A informed B that he will not supply remaining the bags of rice to B. What will be consequences for this contract? Explain.
Mr. Dubious textile enters into a contract with a Retail Garments Show Room for supply of 1000 pieces of cotton shirts at ₹ 300 per shirt to be supplied on or before 31 December 2004. However, on 1 November 2004 Dubious Textiles informs the Retail Garments Show Room that he is not willing to supply the goods as the price of cotton shirts in the meantime has gone upto ₹ 350 per shirt. Examine the rights of the Retail Garments Show Room in this regard.
The actual breach of contract also occurs when during the performance; the party fails to perform his obligation.
The failure of the object due to non-occurrence of the contemplated event discharges the contract.
The contract is discharged if the performance becomes impossible due to a change of law or a change in the government policy after the formation of the contract.
The strikes lock-out and civil disturbances is not the impossibility for the performance of a contract and therefore, the contract is not discharged.
In the case of novation of a contract if the new contract is not enforceable by law the existing contract is received and the parties are bound by it.
The novation must take place before the breach of the original contract.
Where one party, without the consent of the other party, changes the date of payment or delivery of goods or substitutes, such words which change the meaning and affect the contract, such changes are material alterations to the contract.
The contract involving the use of personal skill or ability of the promisor is discharged on the illness, death or incapacity of the promisor.
The injunction order or stay order is in force, the performance of a contract may be stayed. The contract cannot be enforced.
If the performance of a contract becomes difficult, in such a case, the contract is not discharged.
Where there are several objects for which a contract is entered into, the failure of one of the objects will not discharge the contract.
State the various methods of termination of a contract.
(Ref. Para-7.1)
How is the contract discharged on the performance of a promise?
(Ref. Para-7.2)
Explain with examples, the principle of novation, alteration and rescission, where the contract need not to be performed.
(Ref. Para-7.3)
Novation means entering into a new contract in place of the old contract. Explain.
(Ref. Para-7.3)
Write a short note on the novation of the contract.
(Ref. Para-7.3)
Write a short note on the alteration of the contract.
(Ref. Para-7.3)
What do you understand by ‘accord’ and ‘satisfaction’? Write a short note on the novation of a contract.
(Ref. Para-7.3)
Explain the meaning of the term ‘remission’. Write a short note on the novation of a contract.
(Ref. Para-7.3)
Remission may be part or full. Is it correct statement?
(Ref. Para-7.3)
Distinguish between a novation and an alteration.
(Ref. Para-7.4)
Distinguish between a rescission and an alteration.
(Ref. Para-7.5)
The law does not compel the impossible. Comment.
(Ref. Para-7.6)
Discuss the impossibility of performance as the mode of discharge of a contract, stating the difference between the initial and supervening impossibility.
(Ref. Para-7.6)
Does the frustration discharge the contract in all cases? If not, then specify the circumstances in which the contract is not discharged on the ground of frustration.
(Ref. Para-7.7,7.8)
When may a contract be discharged by the operation of law?
(Ref. Para-7.10)
Explain the meaning of the breach of contract.
(Ref. Para-7.11)
Write a short note on the breach of contract.
(Ref. Para-7.11)
Write the difference between the actual breach and the anticipatory breach of contract.
(Ref. Para-7.11)
What remedy is available to party on the breach of contract?
(Ref. Para-7.11)
What are the consequences for the actual breach of contract?
(Ref. Para-7.11)
Write a short note on the anticipatory breach of contract.
(Ref. Para-7.11)