CHAPTER 17
The Employee Life Cycle

To design employee experiences, we first have to think differently about employees and the journey that they will take with your organization.

The typical employee life cycle follows a process that looks something like Figure 17.1.

Illustration depicting Employee Life Cycle.

Figure 17.1 Typical Employee Life Cycle

Nobody thinks about his or her time at an organization in this way. This isn't really the employee life cycle. This is the organization's version of what it wants the employee life cycle to look like. Right now this journey is very one sided and quite frankly, inaccurate, which means whatever experiences your organization is trying to design aren't based on how things actually work. As an organization you can try to create as many neat little buckets and processes as you want, but remember that they simply reflect how you want things to be, not how they actually are. It's like looking at an organizational chart. You may want your company to function in a nice little pyramid, but anyone with a pulse who has worked for an organization knows that these charts never (and I really mean never) reflect how work gets done and how teams are structured.

Some organizations, such as LinkedIn, have been putting a bit of a modern spin on this to see things from the employee perspective. Nina McQueen is the vice president of global benefits, mobility, and employee experience. She along with Pat Wadors (the chief human resources officer) and the rest of their awesome team have a model they use called the 4‐box model. They didn't create this concept but they did adapt it. Not the most exciting name in the world, but hey, it works. Essentially it looks at the four stages that employees go through while working at LinkedIn. The four stages are:

  • Eager Beaver—You just started the job, are super excited, and feel like you can do anything.
  • Oh Sh*t (or Oh My)!—Usually around six months in (can be sooner), you hit a wall and believe the job is not what you thought it was, or perhaps the job is too big and overwhelming. You think you aren't cut out for this.
  • Okay, I'm Starting to Get It—You're able to tackle challenges, complete assignments and big projects, and find your voice. Now you feel like you truly belong.
  • Master—Now you're almost too good. As a result you get a little bit bored and uninspired with the work you are doing. You may even start to look elsewhere at other opportunities outside of the company.

LinkedIn believes and puts a lot of trust in managers to help guide employees through these four areas, especially the Oh My! box. Ideally you should be in all four boxes at the same time. If you find yourself stuck in one of the areas, such as Master, then it's your job to speak with your manager or volunteer on something that can help take you back to the Eager Beaver box (and you are encouraged to do so).

LinkedIn is among the organizations that are thinking about how to redefine the traditional employee life cycle. The traditional model is still there as a way to help organizations think about talent, but it's becoming a more secondary framework. Your approach may not look like the one that LinkedIn has, but I can guarantee you one thing. It also doesn't look like the one depicted above from decades ago.

These life cycles were great when the organization operated like a finely oiled machine, where everyone went through the same process and did the same thing. This isn't how work gets done anymore. Instead, the life cycle is being replaced or augmented by specific moments.

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset