152 9.10 Establishing electronic processes
managed, and evolved separate from the applications." In phase 2, external
resources are leveraged but on a case-by-case basis. In short, processes can util-
ize e-services provided by business partners. In a CRM context this might
mean a vendor vertically integrating front-office functionality with a sup-
plier's inventory system. However, the arrangements for cooperation between
parties still require negotiation and hardwired arrangements involving lawyers
and negotiators.
The third phase, however, is true dynamic integration. Here's how the
authors put it:
Beyond such static use of external services, fully dynamic e-processes
make decisions each time they are executed in order to invoke the
best available service that can fulfill the customer's needs. The tradi-
tional design-deploy cycle of phases 1 and 2 has changed to a
per-instance set of decisions...In order to stay competitive, service
providers should offer the best available service in every given
moment to every specific customer.
Standardization of services is essential if this degree of flexibility can
be offered. Standards are in development~and some were discussed in
Chapter 4. There are, however, a variety of key areas that need to be addressed
by the standards to allow true e-processes and services to be developed.
In Chapter 4 we focused on how XML was becoming the definitive stan-
dard for describing Web services. However, put more generically, services will
need to be described if they are to be appropriately incorporated into an
e-process. In the Hewlett-Packard paper, the authors make the point that they
are not necessarily proposing a "common, global ontology" but rather meth-
ods of defining and discovering ontologies.
Other areas that the standards bodies need to examine include the follow-
ing. The service interface needs to be specified. Transactional processes need
to be defined, as well as security of interactions between services, contractual
issues, and mechanisms for discovering services.
The reason I feel it's important to highlight the concept of dynamic
e-processes (and the technologies that will define them) is because I do believe
that those organizations that define their processes in this way will obtain sub-
stantial competitive advantage.
Indeed, the creation of dynamic e-processes will allow entirely new cus-
tomer experiences to be defined. Customers will be able to define the nature of
their engagement with organizations in ways that were previously unimagin-