Appendix I
The Ion-Interaction Model of Pitzer for Multielectrolyte Solutions

Section 9.14 gives a brief discussion of the ion-interaction model of Pitzer and expressions for the activity coefficient and the osmotic coefficient of binary (single-electrolyte) solutions. This Appendix gives the genera! expressions for these coefficients for multielectrolyte solutions. Also given are tables that list the ion-interaction parameters and their temperature dependence for several common aqueous electrolytes.

For an electrolyte solution containing ws kg of solvent s and solutes i, j,… with molalities mi, mj,…, Pitzer (1995) assumed that the excess Gibbs energy is

(I-1)1

1 Equation (1-1) is the same as Eq. (9-58).

Image

Function f(I) depends on ionic strength I, temperature and solvent properties; it is a modified Debye-Hückel term

(I-2)

Image

with

(I-3)2

Image

2 Equation (1-3) is the same as Eq. (9-43).

The empirical universal constant b = 1.2 kg1/2 mol-1/2 is used for all electrolytes. Aφ is the Debye-Hückel parameter for the osmotic coefficient given by

(I-4)

Image

where NA is Avogadro’s constant, ds is the solvent density in g cm-3, e is the electronic charge (e = 1.60218×l0-19 C), εo the permittivity of free space (εo = 8.85419×l0-12 C2 N-1 m-2), εr is the dielectric constant or relative permittivity of the solvent, k is Boltzmann’s constant and T is absolute temperature.3

3 If the solvent is water (εr = 78.41), Aφ is 0.392 kg1/2 mol-1/2 at 25°C. Aφ increases with temperature to 0.462 at 100°C and to 0.962 at 300°C.

Interaction parameters λij(I) and Λijk. are analogous to second and third virial coefficients; they represent the effects of short-range forces between, respectively, two and three ions. For highly concentrated solutions, fourth or higher-order interactions may be required in Eq. (1-1). The λij and Λijk matrices are symmetric, with λij = λijk, Λijk = Λijk = Λijk etc. Parameters λij and Λijk are also used for ion-neutral and neutral-neutral interactions in the solvent. For the ion-neutral case, theory suggests an ionic-strength dependence when the neutral species has a significant dipole moment. However, these parameters are usually considered to be constants at a given temperature, independent of ionic strength.

For electrolytes with cations c, c′,… and anions a, a′,… only some combinations of λ’s and Λ’s are measurable. The following definitions simplify the final equations for activity coefficients:

(I-5)

Image

(1-6)

Image

(1-7)

Image

(1-8)

Image

with corresponding expressions for Φaa, and Ψaa’c- Because parameters λij, are functions of ionic strength, Bca, Φcc. and Φaa are also functions of I. For brevity, however, the explicit notation B(I), etc. is omitted except for f(I).

The excess Gibbs energy becomes

(1-9)

Image

The double-summation indices, c < c’, a < a’, and n < n’ denote sums over all distinguishable pairs of different cations, anions, and neutral solutes, respectively.

Applying Eqs. (9-42) and (9-43) to Eq. (1-9), gives expressions for the osmotic coefficient and the mean ionic activity coefficients of the various electrolytes in a multielectrolyte mixture. To obtain the mean ionic activity coefficient y±x for an electrolyte Mv+ Xv–, it is preferable to obtain initially the expressions for the activity coefficients y+,M and y-x of the individual ions Image” and Image; the expression for y+,M is then obtained in a subsequent step. The results are:

(1-10)

Image

(1-11)

Image

(1-12)

Image

(1-13)

Image

where second-virial terms for neutral species have been added but third-virial terms for neutrals are omitted. Terms B and C can be evaluated empirically from data for binary (single electrolyte + solvent) systems. Terms Φ and Ψ arise only for multi-electrolyte solutions; they can best be determined from data for common-ion mixtures. Quantity F includes the Debye-Huckel term and other terms as follows:

(1-14)

Image

Also,

(1-15)

Image

(1-16)

Image

(1-17)

Image

A corresponding expression is used for Image.B’ and Φ’ are the ionic-strength derivatives of B and Φ. The sums over i include all solute species; uncharged species do not contribute to I or Z. Parameter CMX is related to the commonly tabulated Image by

(1-18)

Image

The ionic-strength dependence of B terms is taken into account by

(1-19)

Image

(1-19a)

Image

(1-19b)

Image

where functions g and g’ are given by

(1-20)

Image

(1-20a)

Image

Image,Image and Image are solute-specific parameters fitted to isothermal or isobaric and data for single-electrolyte solutions, Image is important only for 2-2 or higher-valence electrolytes that show a tendency toward electrostatic ion pairing. For solutions of electrolytes containing at least one univalent ion, α1 is taken to be 2.0 kg1/2 mol-1/2 and a2 = 0. For 2-2 electrolytes at 25°C, the optimized values of α1 and α2 are 1.4 and 12 kg1’2 mol”s/2, respectively. For many applications these values can be assumed independent of temperature and pressure, but there are theoretical reasons (Pitzer, 1991) for setting α2 proportional to the Debye-Hücke! parameter AImage.

The Φ terms have a strong ionic-strength dependence for unsymmetric cases (e.g. Na+ with Mg2+ or Cl- with Image”) arising from long-range electrostatic forces. The expressions for Φij are

(I-21)

Image

(I-21a)

Image

(I-21b)

Image

where Eθ(I) and Eθ’(I) account for electrostatic unsymmetric mixing effects and depend only on charges of ions i and j, the total ionic strength, and on the density and dielectric constant of the solvent (i.e. on the temperature and pressure). Equations for calculating these terms have been developed; they are given elsewhere (Pitzer, 1991). The remaining term θij, arising from short-range forces, is taken as a constant for any particular c, c’ or a, a’ at a given temperature and pressure. Terms Eθ(I) and Eθ’(I) are often omitted for solubility calculations.

Pitzer’s ion-interactive model gives expressions for the osmotic and activity coefficients of multi-electrolyte mixtures in terms of six types of empirical parameters, viz.Image,Image,Image, Imageij and φijk. Provided that the temperature and pressure dependencies of these parameters are known, solubilities in binary, ternary and higher mixtures can be calculated.

The excess Gibbs energy given by Eq. (I-1) yields other thermodynamic properties such as excess enthalpies and heat capacities by appropriate differentiation. These other excess properties can be measured directly. In the literature there is a wide array of experimental data for obtaining ion-interaction parameters and their dependence on temperature and pressure. Tables published elsewhere (Pitzer, 1991, 1995; Clegg and Whitfield, 1991; Zemaitis et al., 1986) give ion-interaction parameters for numerous aqueous solutions of electrolytes. Table I-1 gives parameters at 25°C for a few common aqueous electrolytes and Table I-2 gives the temperature dependence of parameters for those electrolytes used in Sec. 9.14 for model calculations. The mixed-electrolyte parameters for variable-temperature calculations are shown in Table I-3.

With model parameters determined as discussed above, and with experimental solubility products, Pitzer’s model can be used to predict solid solubilities in aqueous mixed-salt systems. It is relatively easy to calculate solubilities in two-salt solutions with a common ion. If the two salts do not have a common ion or, if there are more than two salts, the calculations become complex; they require solution of numerous simultaneous equations.

Section 9.14 presents two examples to illustrate how Pitzer’s equation, coupled with solubility products, can be used to calculate solid-liquid equilibria in aqueous systems containing two salts. Table I-4 gives standard-state chemical potentials, enthalpies of formation, and entropies at 25°C of the ions and solids considered there and for some other species of common interest. It is an important characteristic of the equations of the ion-interaction model of Pitzer that, for calculating solid-liquid equilibria, all parameters can be evaluated from measurements for single-electrolyte solutions and solutions containing two electrolytes with a comrnon-ion. No new parameters are required. Therefore, calculations for multi-salt systems are predictions.

Table I-1 Ion-interaction parameters at 25°C. Parameters only apply to a maximum molaity of 4-6 mol kg”1 (from Pitzer, 1995).

Image

Table I-2 Standard-state heat capacity and temperature dependence of ion-interaction parameters for aqueous NaCl, KCl, and Na2SO4 (from Pitzer, 1995).

Image

Image

Table I-3 Mixed-electrolyte parameters for variable-temperature calculations (T in kelvin) (Pabalan and Pitzer, 1991).

Image

Table I-4 Standard-state chemical potentials, enthalpies of formation, and entropies of aqueous species and solid salts at 25°C (Pitzer, 1995). Values in parentheses have large uncertainties.

Image

The equations presented in this appendix are complex but they are all analytical. For application, a suitable computer program is required.

The practical applications of Pitzer’s method are not due to mathematical complexity but follow from the need for a large experimental-data base to fix parameters.

References

Clegg, S. L. and M. Whitfield, 1991. In Activity Coefficients of Electrolyte Solutions, (K. S. Pitzer, Ed.), 2nd Ed., Chap. 6. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Pabalan, R. T. and K. S. Pitzer, 1991. In Activity Coefficients of Electrolyte Solutions, (K. S. Pitzer, Ed.), 2nd Ed., Chap. 7. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Pitzer, K. S., 1991. In Activity Coefficients in Electrolyte Solutions, (K. S. Pitzer, Ed.), 2nd Ed., Chap. 3. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Pitzer, K. S., 1995, Thermodynamics, 3rd Ed. New York: McGraw Hill.

Zemaitis, R. M., Jr., D. M. Clark, M. Rafal, and N. C. Scrivner, 1986, Handbook of Aqueous Electrolyte Thermodynamics. New York: A.I.Ch.E.

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset