18

Bio-based nutraceuticals from biorefining

Y. Liang and Z. Wen,    Iowa State University, USA

Abstract:

Nutraceuticals as health promoting agents have received great attention from both the scientific community and the general public in the past decades. They have been found from diversified resources, possessing a wide range of beneficial effects in biological systems. Bio-based nutraceuticals are derived from natural renewable resources, which can be extracted as a component in the biomaterials or produced through bioprocessing. The main focus of this chapter is on bio-based nutraceuticals, specifically on the current status of the nutraceuticals market, the classification of nutraceuticals, and the properties and functions of individual classes of nutraceuticals. In addition, the future prospective of bio-based nutraceuticals is also discussed.

Key words

bio-based; nutraceuticals; lipid; protein; peptide; polysaccharide; phenolics; alkaloids; carotenoids

18.1 Introduction

18.1.1 Definition and history of nutraceuticals

‘Nutraceutical’, a word combining ‘nutrition’ and ‘pharmaceutical’, is used to describe a special food or food ingredient with medical or health benefits such as prevention and/or treatment of disease (DeFelice, 1992). Nutraceuticals may refer to dietary supplements, plant extracts, or food designed for specific purposes (DeFelice, 1995). The earliest recognition of nutraceuticals was in the 1980s with calcium, fiber, and fish oil being recognized as health-promoting agents (DeFelice, 1995). With significant research efforts being pursued to explore functional components from plants, marine organisms, and microorganisms (actinomycetes and fungi) (Cocks et al., 1995), nutraceuticals have expanded from basic dietary supplements to a vast range of compounds such as bioactive constituents extracted from plants (polyphenols and lycopene) (Carlos Espin et al., 2007), food ingredients produced by microorganisms (amino acids and omega-3 fatty acids) (Hermann, 2003; Athalye et al., 2009), and microorganisms themselves as an integral part of food (Spirulina and yogurt cultures) (Salminen and Isolauri, 2006; Peiretti and Meineri, 2011).

Nutraceutical development has been in full swing for the past decade. The global market for nutraceuticals was already worth $117.3 billion in 2007 (Ahmad et. al., 2011). With the promotion of the well-being concept and increasing health awareness, the nutraceutical market share is expected to have a steady growth rate in the coming years, and is estimated to attain $176.7 billion in 2013 (Ahmad et al., 2011).

18.1.2 Legislation and regulation of nutraceuticals

With the rapid expansion of the nutraceutical market, more legislation has been implemented to regulate the use and production of this group of products. Beginning in 1994, the United States Congress established the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA), which provided a clear definition of a dietary supplement in order to distinguish it from medicine and food. It also created the Office of Dietary Supplements within the National Institute of Health (NIH) to institute consumer protections, increase public education, and promote research on the possible health effects of dietary supplements (Office of Legislative Policy and Analysis, n.d.).

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently established new regulations (termed the ‘Final Rule’) for the nutraceutical industry that are in accordance with the International Conference of Harmonisation (ICH) standards. ICH brings experts from the European Union, Japan, and the United States together to establish guidelines for safe, effective, and high quality medicine (International Conference of Harmonisation, 2012). The Final Rule, established in 2007 and phased in over three years, set standards for dietary supplement production called ‘Good Manufacturing Practices’ (GMPs). Specifically, it established standards for quality control, ingredient labeling, product claims, complaint records, and manufacturing procedures, among others, in an effort to insure that consumers have access to accurately labeled, high quality dietary supplements free from contamination (US Food and Drug Administration, 2009).

GMPs aim to ensure a high quality standard in dietary supplements by holding manufacturers responsible for product identity, purity, composition, and strength. This would prevent the inclusion of pesticides and other contaminants in the saleable product. However, there is no standardization of dietary supplements in the United States (Office of Dietary Supplements, n.d.).

18.1.3 Biorefinery and bio-based nutraceuticals

Bio-based nutraceuticals are defined as nutraceuticals derived from the biomass refinery process. In biomass refinery, where the biomass is completely utilized for sustainable fuels and chemicals production (Amidon et al., 2011), the production of bio-based nutraceuticals, which are regarded as high value co-products, can reduce the cost of the overall production process and thus enhance its economic viability. However, it should be noted that compared with fuels or bulk chemicals, the market size for bio-based nutraceuticals is rather small. If the biomass refinery industry is fully developed, the market for bio-based nutraceuticals will be saturated and thus the prices and the profit margin will inevitably be reduced.

Depending on the biorefinery processe used, production of bio-based nutraceuticals is usually achieved through two routes: physical separation/extraction from biomass materials or biological production by various microorganisms. Some biomass materials contain active compounds that can be extracted to make nutraceutical products while they are mainly used as feedstock for fuels and chemicals. For example, acetylic acids, β-carotene, vitamin B, astaxanthin, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and lutein are some valuable products found in microalgae, which can be integrated into algal-based biofuel production and potentially enhance the economic feasibility of the process (Christaki et al., 2011). Current breakthroughs in bioseparation methods such as chromatography techniques, supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), and nanotechnology separation (Walker et al., 2006) have brought in great opportunities for the economic production of bio-based nutraceuticals from biomass feedstock. For example, recent studies have shown that supercritical fluid extraction can be an economic and scalable tool in extracting functional ingredients from different natural resources, including plants, food by-products, algae, and microalgae (Herrero et al., 2006).

Many nutraceutical-based compounds can be co-produced by microorganisms during microbial fermentation for fuels and chemicals. For example, carotenoids, astaxanthins, and polyunsaturated fatty acids can be synthesized by microalgae while the algal cells are mainly used as feedstocks for fuel and energy production (Christaki et al., 2011). Currently, microbial production of nutraceuticals in general is limited by several factors such as the high cost of substrate and low production yield. Inexpensive feedstocks from biomass refineries can provide a cheap substrate for microorganisms, but may still be limited by other factors such as the lack of a robust strain with high product yield. Metabolic engineering has become an effective tool to enhance the cells’ capability of synthesizing certain desired compounds for nutraceuticals (Hugenholtz and Smid, 2002). For example, fermentative production of mannitol from lactic acid bacteria has been successfully implemented by modification of the genomic information and redirection of the metabolic flux (Ferain et al., 1996; Neves et al., 2000).

In general, nutraceuticals from bio-based materials can be classified as lipid-based, protein and peptide-based, and carbohydrate-based, depending on the nature of the functional constituents. Some small molecular bioactive compounds such as secondary metabolites are also considered to be bio-based nutraceuticals. This chapter discusses the recent research progress of bio-based nutraceuticals, the advantages and limitations of bio-based nutraceutical production, and its potential opportunities and challenges.

18.2 Lipid-based nutraceuticals

In the past years, the production of lipid-based biofuels has been intensively studied. Lipid producers include terrestrial plant seeds (such as soybean, canola, and castor) and oleaginous microorganisms (such as microalgae, bacteria, and fungi). Compared to plant seeds, microorganisms have attracted considerable research interest due to their fast growth rate. However, the commercialization of lipid-based biofuels has been largely limited by the high production cost, even though a significant amount of research has been conducted in order to improve the microbial oil content and productivity. As a result, producing lipid-based nutraceuticals as an addition to the fuel production opens up a new opportunity for improving the process economy and reducing the overall production cost.

18.2.1 Types, properties, and functions of lipid-based nutraceuticals

Lipids refer to a group of naturally occurring compounds that are readily soluble in organic solvents. They are classified as neutral or polar type depending on the nature of their chemical structures. Triglyceride and its derivatives (mono-, di-glyceride, and free fatty acid), waxes, sterols, fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, and K), phospholipids, and sphingolipids are the major lipid types present in nature. They exist in different parts of living organisms and have various biological functions. Triglyceride and its derivatives are abundant in microorganisms as well as the fatty tissues in human bodies where they serve as energy storage molecules. Phospholipids are the major components of the cell membrane while sphingolipids work as signaling molecules in cell metabolism. Sterols are the precursors of steroid hormones and vitamins play important roles in biological systems, such as regulating cell and tissue growth and differentiation (vitamin A), promoting calcium absorption (vitamin D), and performing antioxidant function (vitamin E) (http://lipidlibrary.aocs.org/).

Lipid-based nutraceuticals encompass various products including omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), phytosterols, lipophilic vitamins and their analogues as well as polar lipids with specific functions. The main focus of this chapter will be on PUFAs, phytosterols, and polar lipids.

Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids

Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), particularly eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5 n-3, EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (22:6 n-3, DHA) are a class of lipids with various biological functions. Clinical and epidemiological studies have shown the preventive and therapeutic effects of omega-3 PUFAs on a series of illnesses such as rheumatoid arthritis, heart disease, cancers, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer’s disease (Cohen and Ratledge, 2010). The health benefits delivered by PUFAs have led to significant efforts in exploring omega-3 PUFA sources and their commercial production processes.

Fish oil has been used as a commercial source of omega-3 PUFAs. However, the peculiar taste and odor, and possible metal contamination of fish oil have limited its applications (Barclay et al., 1994). Microbial production of EPA and DHA, on the other hand, can largely avoid these problems: therefore, it has been a promising alternative for supplying high quality PUFAs (Kralovec et al., 2012).

A variety of microorganisms, including lower fungi, bacteria, and marine microalgae, are capable of synthesizing omega-3 PUFAs (Bajpai et al., 1991; Kendrick and Ratledge, 1992; Ratledge et al., 2001; Athalye et al., 2009; Johnson and Wen, 2009; Liang et al., 2011). Among these omega-3 PUFA producer candidates, bacteria are not suitable for commercial PUFA production as they cannot accumulate high levels of lipids, and the co-produced fatty acids are uncommon in other systems, which might be an issue for human consumption (Ratledge et al., 2001). In contrast, oleaginous fungi and microalgae with high PUFA content and high lipid production yield are good candidates as economical PUFA producers. For example, the marine microalga Schizochytrium sp (Barclay et al., 1994) and Crypthecodinium cohnii (Ratledge et al., 2001; de Swaaf et al., 2003) have been used for commercial DHA production. In general, microbial species belonging to the genera of Mortierella, Pythium, and Saprolegnia have been found to be capable of producing appreciable amounts of EPA (Cohen and Ratledge, 2010) and genetic modification has also been introduced to improve the strain performance (Cohen et al., 1992). In comparison to commercial DHA production, commercial microbial production of EPA is still rarely reported, with genetically modified yeast Yarrowia lipolyfica being the only strain used for commercial production by DuPont. The major reason is the low EPA yield and productivity from those microbial sources, although a considerable amount of studies have been conducted to identify EPA producers and to enhance the production yield. As a result, microbial production of EPA is still in the infancy stage. Further increase of EPA level to an economically viable point requires in-depth understanding of factors that influence EPA production.

Phytosterols

Phytosterols, possessing similar structures to cholesterol, are found in the fat-soluble fractions of plants. They represent a wide range of natural compounds with a structure skeleton of triterpene. Depending on the carbon side chain, the presence/absence of double bond, and attachment of sugar molecules (Moreau et al., 2002), phytosterols can be classified as sterols, stanols, and conjugated glucosides. The biological synthetic pathway of triterpene skeleton starts from the reduction of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) (six carbons) to mevalonate (five carbons). Six mevalonate units are then linked together to form two molecules of farnesyl diphosphate, which are connected to make squalene (30 carbons) (Hicks and Moreau, 2001). Further enzymatic reactions will promote the formation of ring structures, the cleavage of carbon–carbon bonds, and the addition of hydroxyl groups or other molecules. The end products are diversified phytosterols and triterpene alcohols (Moreau et al., 2002).

Phytosterols have been reported to reduce the cholesterol level in serum through the following mechanisms:

• Phytosterols can displace cholesterol from bile salt micelles due to their higher affinity for micelles, and thus, inhibit cholesterol absorption (Ikeda and Sugano, 1998).

• Phytosterols crystallize with cholesterols in the gastrointestinal tract,which leads to the formation of poorly absorbable mixed crystals and the consequent reduction of sterol uptake in the intestinal lumen (Trautwein et al., 2003).

• Phytosterols inhibit the hydrolysis of cholesterol esters, which can reduce the amount of absorbable free cholesterol, and thus interfere with cholesterol absorption (Ikeda et al., 2002).

Phytosterols are present in our diet, primarily in the form of vegetable oils, cereals, fruits and vegetables. In western countries, people consume an average of 250 mg per day of phytosterols (Hicks and Moreau, 2001), which is much less than the effective dosage. Therefore, additional consumption of phytosterols is needed for an effective reduction of cholesterol. A series of phytosterol fortified foods has been developed, such as margarine, salad dressings, and milk products (Akoh, 2005). In addition to lowering serum cholesterol, phytosterols have also been used as substrates for producing high-value steroidal drugs via biological conversions and chemical reactions (Donova, 2007), which have expanded the application of phytosterol-based nutraceuticals.

With advancements in biotechnology, Microalgae have been identified as phytosterol producers in a large diversity of products. Dunaliella salina and Dunaliella tertiolecta were reported to produce 0.89% and 1.3% total sterols on a dry weight basis under defined conditions. The whole sterol extracts from D. salina and D. tertiolecta showed therapeutic effects on hypercholesterolemia, which could potentially have applications in the nutraceutical and pharmaceutical industries (Francavilla et al., 2010). Although the yield of phytosterols from microalgae is relatively low, this fraction can add value to algal-based bio-fuel and bio-chemical production, thus commercialization of microalgal phytosterols might be an achievable target when a biorefinery concept is applied.

Polar lipids

Polar lipids with amphiphilic nature are often associated with membrane structure, and play a variety of biological functions. A majority of polar lipids (Fig. 18.1) found in cell membranes are glycerophospholipids (GPLs), which have a glycerol backbone with fatty acids attached. Some examples of GPLs include phosphatidyl choline, phosphatidyl ethanolamine, and phosphatidyl serine. When the polar lipids are derived from sphingosin, the corresponding polar lipids are classified as sphingophospholipids (SPLs). Sphingomyelin, consisting of a ceramide unit and a phosphorylcholine moiety, is the most representative SPL found in the neural system (Oshida et al., 2003). By interacting with cellular membranes, dietary polar lipids can alter the membrane compositions, and thus affect a series of signaling process and enzymatic functions (Küllenberg et al., 2012). Some beneficial effects exerted by polar lipids consist of anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, cholesterol lowering, and brain development (Küllenberg et al., 2012).

image
18.1 Structure of polar lipids.

Polyphosphatidyl choline (PPC), extracted from soybean, with themain active ingredient of 1,2-dilinoleoylphosphatidyl choline (DLPC) has been proven to possess beneficial effects in various liver diseases. DLPC is found to have a high content of polyunsaturated fatty acids, particularly linoleic acid. Oral administration of PPC can induce a series of changes, including restoring membrane structure, increasing membrane fluidity, enhancing membrane-associated metabolic functions, reducing peroxidative reactions, improving immune properties, and stabilizing bile compositions (Gundermann et al., 2011). These positive effects revealed from a pharmacological standpoint have also been confirmed in clinical trials. Test subjects with different types of liver disease responded positively to the consumption of PPC with rare and weak side effects. Therefore, soybean-derived PPC is a good nutraceutical supplement in preventing liver disease and promoting the restoration of physical health for patients (Gundermann et al., 2011).

Sulfoquinovosylacylglycerol (SQAG) (Fig. 18.2) is an anionicglycerolipid, associated with monogalactosyldiacylglycerol and digalactosyldiacylglycerol, and present as a structural component in the photosynthetic membranes of plants, algae, and various bacteria (Berge et al., 2002). It is one of the few lipids derived from natural sources with sulfonic acid linkages discovered to date (Sanda et al., 2001). Due to the uniqueness of the chemical nature of SQAG, studies have been conducted to extract and characterize SQAG from various marine red and blue-green algae, and a series of biological functions related to SQAG have been reported. SQAGs derived from algae have shown an inhibitory effect on both eukaryotic DNA α- and β-polymerases and HIV-reverse transcriptase. Hence, they can potentially be used as antiviral and antitumor supplements (Gustafson et al., 1989; Loya et al., 1998; Ohta et al., 1998).

image
18.2 Structure of sulfoquinovosylacylglycerol.

18.3 Protein and peptide-based nutraceuticals

Many proteins and peptides derived from a multitude of food-based plants and animals, such as milk, soy, and fish proteins, possess specific biological functions in addition to their established nutritional roles as antioxidants and/or substrates for tissue building (Korhonen and Pihlanto, 2003; Zaloga and Siddiqui, 2004). Exogenous bioactive peptides associated with foods can be classified, based on their physiological functions, as anti-hypertensive, ACE inhibitory, antimicrobial, antithrombotic, immunomodulatory, mineral binding, opiod agonist, and opiod antagonist peptides (Owusu-Apenten, 2010).

The production of bioactive peptides can be achieved via the hydrolysis of food proteins or microbial fermentation. For example, milk protein is found to be a good substrate for both hydrolysis and fermentation for producing bioactive peptides (Pfeuffer and Schrezenmeir, 2000; Salamia et al., 2011). Many bioactive peptides can also be produced by non-food-based microorganisms, plants, and animals. For instance, cyanobacteria have been reported to produce ∼ 40% lipopeptides, which have cytotoxic, antitumor, antiviral, and antibiotic activities (Singh et al., 2005). These bioactive peptides are diversified in chemical nature, including dipeptides, complex linear peptides, cyclic oligopeptides, or polypeptides with glycosylation, phosphorylation, and amino acid residue acylation (Schlimme and Meisel, 1995). Genetic modification is another approach for producing bioactive peptides with desirable properties through rational design and the modification of relevant genes. In this chapter, we will not explore the genetic manipulation approach for bioactive protein synthesis; instead, our main focus is on traditional ways of producing bioactive proteins and peptides, particularly from algae-derived materials.

18.3.1 Algae proteins

Unlike milk and egg which have been considered as good protein sources for a long time, algae-derived proteins did not receive much attention until algal biofuel research became a popular topic in recent years. Algal proteins have great potential to mitigate the high production cost of algal-based biofuel, particularly when the proteins have certain biological functions and can be sold as high value products. In general, the protein content of algae varies with species. Green and red algae have relatively high protein content (around 40%) while protein content in brown algae can be lower than 15% (Murata and Nakazoe, 2001). Most algae proteins contain all the essential amino acids with a high content of aspartic acid and glutamic acid and a low level of sulfur-containing amino acids (Fleurence, 1999).

Lectins are sugar-binding proteins naturally occurring in algae. Some bioactive lectins identified in macroalgal species such as Ulva sp., Eucheuma spp. and Gracilaria sp. have exhibited various biological functions including antibiotic, mitogenic, cytotoxic, anti-nociceptive, anti-inflammatory, anti-adhesion and anti-HIV activities (Bird et al., 1993; Smit, 2004; Mori et al., 2005). These bioactive functions are achieved mainly by binding a soluble carbohydrate or a carbohydrate moiety of glycoprotein or glycolipid, and subsequently precipitating the glycoconjugates. Lectins as agglutinins have found applications in biology, cytology, biochemistry, medicine, food science, and technology (Smit, 2004).

Phycobiliproteins are water-soluble proteins that are a part of light-harvesting protein-pigment complexes in cyanobacteria and certain microalgae. Spirulina has been found to be a rich source of phycobiliproteins. C-phycocyanin, a major phycobiliprotein, has been reported to possess a variety of biologically beneficial effects, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective benefits. Spirulina-derived phycocyanin has been used in the food and beverage industry as a natural pigment. Phycocyanin has been commercially produced in open ponds and raceway systems at tropical and subtropical Pacific Ocean regions (Lee, 1997; Pulz, 2001; Spolaore et al., 2006). In open raceway systems, the productivities of dry biomass and phycocyanin were around 14 and 0.85 g/m2 a day, respectively (Jiménez et al., 2003). The extraction of phycocyanin from algal biomass mainly consists of two steps: disintegration of cells and extraction of the water-soluble phycobiliproteins into aqueous media. Further purification of phycocyanin can be achieved by ammonium sulfate precipitation, chromatographic methods (Boussiba and Richmond, 1979; Zhang and Chen, 1999; Minkova et al., 2003; Niu et al., 2007; Abalde et al., 1998; Soni et al., 2006), and ultrafiltration (Herrera et al., 1989). Recently, a method based on two-phase aqueous extraction followed by chromatography was successfully developed to prepare ultra-pure C-phycocyanin (Patil et al., 2006).

18.3.2 Algae-derived bioactive peptides

Bioactive peptides from algae can be divided into two categories: endogenous peptides and enzymatically hydrolyzed peptides (Harnedy and Fitzgerald, 2011). Endogenous peptides, including linear peptides, cyclic peptides, depsipeptides, and different peptide derivatives, possess various biological activities (Harnedy and Fitzgerald, 2011). Carnosine, an antioxidant peptide due to its capability of chelating transitional metals (Brown, 1981; Fleurence 2004), has been found in macroalgae (Fleurence, 2004; Shiu and Lee, 2005). Glutathione, another antioxidant peptide found in the green macroalga Ulvafasciata, is produced under high oxidative conditions, in which an inherent enzymatic antioxidant system (ascorbate-glutathione) is stimulated and glutathione is produced to scavenge and detoxify oxidative free-radical molecules (Shiu and Lee, 2005). Kahalalide F, a cyclic depsipeptide, produced by the green alga Bryopsin sp., has been proposed as a new natural anti-cancer drug candidate (Hamann and Scheuer, 1993). It has a strong cytotoxic activity in vitro against different cell lines including prostate, breast, and colon carcinomas as well as neuroblastoma, chondrosarcoma, and osteosarcoma (Hamann and Scheuer, 1993; Suárez et al., 2003). In vivo tests and some clinical trials have also been carried out, showing a great prospect for the drug application of Kahalalide F (Luber-Narod et al., 2000; Provencio et al., 2006; Pardo et al., 2008).

Bioactive peptides from algal protein hydrolysates have shown various functionalities such as ACE-inhibitory, anti-hypertensive, antioxidant, antitumor, antityrosinase, anticoagulant, calcium-precipitation-inhibitory, antimutagenic, plasma- and hepatic-cholesterol reducing, blood-sugar-lowering, and superoxide dismutase (SOD)-like activities (Harnedy and Fitzgerald, 2011). These protein hydrolysates were mainly prepared by using food grade enzymes including protamex, trypsin, pepsin, alcalase, flavourzyme, and neutrase (Harnedy and Fitzgerald, 2011). Purification of the bioactive peptides has been achieved by ultrafiltration and nanofiltration, which render a great potential for the application of peptides as functional food ingredients (Korhonen, 2009).

18.4 Carbohydrate-based nutraceuticals

Polysaccharides are considered the most abundant renewable resource on earth, and have been well known as feedstocks for renewable fuels production. Unlike those cellulose- and hemicellulose-based bulk materials, in nature, there are also some specific polysaccharides possessing unique properties and biological functions that can be made into nutraceuticals. These polysaccharides will be the main emphasis in this section. Prebiotics (typically oligosaccharides) are another type of carbohydrate-based nutraceuticals, which can stimulate the growth and/or activities of gut microflora, thus increasing health benefits for humans. Research has been conducted to explore different types of prebiotics from various feedstocks. In this section, prebiotics from renewable resources will also be examined.

18.4.1 Bioactive polysaccharides

The first bioactive polysaccharide reported to have specific functionality is lentinan, a polysaccharide found in the mushroom L. edodes Sing., with strong antitumor activity(Chichara et al.,1969). Lentinan has a1,3-β-glucopyranosidic structure with two1,6-β-D-glucopyranosidic branches every five glucose units in the main chain (Fig. 18.3). The strong antitumor activity of lentinan was attributed to its highly ordered structure; which can induce interleukin-12 (IL-12), a secreted protein/signaling molecule responsible for stimulating natural killer cells and T lymphocytes production (Wiederschain, 2007). Another anti-cancer polysaccharide, schizophyllan, was also isolated from the mushroom S. commune in the earlier days (Komatsu et al., 1969). These antitumor polysaccharides possess a similar structural characteristic, i.e., the skeletion of 1,3-β-glucan with some 1,6-β-glucose branches (Yagita, 1997). Biologically active compounds can be obtained by the enzymatic hydrolysis of the hemicellulose skeleton in the cell wall of fungal mycelia, which explains the presence of a wide variety of anti-cancer polysaccharides in different fungi species.

image
18.3 Structure of lentinan.

A sulfated polysaccharide extracted from marine red alga, Schizymenia pacifica, was found to have anti-HIV functions. This polysaccharide was proven to be a member of λ-carrageenan with 20% sulfonate content. The molecular weight of the bioactive polysaccharide is around two million; the major sugar units are galactose and 3,6-anhydrogalactose (Nakashima et al., 1987a, 1987b). This sulfated polysaccharide can selectively inhibit HIV reverse transcriptase (RT) and replication in vitro.

Sulfated polysaccharides are the most studied bioactive polysaccharides. In addition to their antivirus capabilities, numerous sulfated polysaccharides isolated from algae have also been reported to show antioxidant, proliferative, immuno-inflammatory, antimicrobial and antilipidemic behavior (Jiao et al., 2011; Wijesinghe and Jeon, 2012). For example, a sulfated fucoidan, from commercially cultured Cladosiphon okamuranus TOKIDA, has demonstrated its anti-proliferative activity in human leukemia U937 cells by inducing apoptosis associated with degradation of PARP, caspase-3 and -7 activation in U937 cells (Teruya et al., 2007). The producer of sulfated fucoidan, C. okamuranus TOKIDA has been cultivated commercially. A fucidan from C. okamuranus TOKIDA has been used as an additive in health foods, drinks, and cosmetics in Japan (Teruya et al., 2007).

Dietary fibers, primarily composed of polysaccharides, have also attracted tremendous research and public attention. Consumption of dietary fiber has been related to a multitude of health-promoting benefits, including lowering total and LDL cholesterol, regulating blood pressure, alleviating constipation, and stimulating the proliferation of gut microflora (Dhingra et al., 2012). Pectins are one type of dietary fibers with D-galacturonic acid as a principal constituent. They are structural components of fruit and vegetable cell walls (Maxwell et al., 2012), and have been produced from dried citrus peel or apple pomace, both by-products of juice production (Sato et al., 2011; Guo et al., 2012). β-Glucans are another type of valuable dietary fibers with D-glucose monomers linked by β-glycosidic bonds. They are predominantly non-starch polysaccharides present in cereal crops, particularly in barley and oat (Ahmad et al., 2012). Both pectins and β-glucans have special physical properties such as thickening, stabilizing, emulsification, and gelation, which make them suitable to be incorporated in soups, sauces, beverages, and other food products (Burkus and Temelli, 2000; Maxwell et al., 2012).

18.4.2 Extraction and purification of polysaccharides

Extraction of polysaccharides from biomass sources is commonly conducted using the following procedures:

• Cell disruption and water extraction, usually achieved with the assistance of treatments like heat and ultrasonic disintegration.

• Polymer precipitation from water extract by a precipitating agent (e.g., methanol, ethanol, isopropanol or acetone).

• Drying of the precipitated polymer, namely freeze drying (laboratory scale) or drum drying (industrial scale) (Imeson, 2010; Pang et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2012).

The purification of polysaccharides can be achieved by using different chromatographic techniques, including ion exchange, gel permeation, and affinity chromatography (Srivastava and Kulshreshtha, 1989). However, these techniques are limited by their loading capacities and can only be used on a small scale. The simulated moving bed (SMB) technique has recently received more attention due to its high separation efficiency and applicability for sugar purification. It is a scalable method and suitable for industrial processing of functional carbohydrates (Walker et al., 2006).

18.4.3 Prebiotics

Prebiotics are defined as ‘selectively fermented ingredients that allow specific changes, both in the composition and/or activity of the gastrointestinal microbiota that confers benefits upon host well-being and health’ (Gibson et al., 2004). Most prebiotics are oligosaccharides, which resist digestion by pancreatic and brush border enzymes. They can be produced by extraction from plant materials, enzymatic hydrolysis of polysaccharides, and microbial/enzymatic synthesis (Figueroa-Gonzalez et al., 2011).

Inulin is one of the most established prebiotics with the structure of β(2-1)-fructans (Gibson et al., 2004; Figueroa-Gonzalez et al., 2011). It can be extracted from chicory root and Agave tequilana with the degree of polymerization (DP) varying from 2 to 65. Partial enzymatic hydrolysis of inulin using an endo-inulinase (EC 3.2.1.7) can lead to the production of oligofructose (DP 2-7). The food industry has developed specific products known as Synergy® (Orafti NV, Tienen, Belgium) by mixing oligofructose and long-chain inulin. Different industrial products have different DP distribution and, therefore, varying technological properties (Franck, 2002).

Galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS), which are mixtures of oligosaccharides derived from the enzymatic transglycosylation of lactose, are another type of prebiotic. β-Galactosidases are the primary enzymes responsible for the conversion of lactose to GOS. As β-galactosidases have the capability of conducting both transgalactosylation and hydrolysis reactions, the yield of GOS is low due to the presence of the hydrolysis process (Ganzle, 2011). Methods to improve the yield of GOS have been investigated including enzyme selection, protein engineering, and optimizing reaction conditions. GOS yields have been achieved from 40 to 60% in the final product (Park and Oh, 2010).

Prebiotics have also been produced through a biorefinery process as valuable products. For example, oligofructose was enzymatically synthesized when the aqueous extracts from dairy by-products were used as substrate (Smaali et al., 2012). Xylooligosaccharides with prebiotic activities have been manufactured from solid waste in malting industries by double hydrothermal processing (Gullon et al., 2011). Prebiotics, as carbohydrate-based functional compounds, have been receiving tremendous research efforts within the context of biorefinery production.

18.5 Other nutraceuticals

There are several types of nutraceuticals that do not fall into the aforementioned categories. These nutraceuticals are small molecules and diverse in chemical characterizations, natural presence, and biological functions. Many of them are secondary metabolites (such as phenolic compounds and alkaloids), which are found in plants and microbial cells for maintaining the physiological functions or defending the cells from external stress. Carotenoids, as pigment components, are another source of bio-based nutraceuticals.

18.5.1 Phenolic compounds

Phenolic compounds are the most abundant and widely represented class of plant natural products. With a growing body of evidence that bioactive phenolics exert strong health-promoting effects, phenolic compounds have a great potential to be used as nutraceutical supplements and pharmacological agents (Wildman, 2007).

Phenolic compounds are a group of structurally diversified chemicals derived from phenylalanine and tyrosine. Plant phenolic compounds comprise simple phenols, phenolic acids (both benzoic and cinnamic acid derivatives), coumarins, flavonoids, stilbenes, hydrolysable and condensed tannins, lignans, and lignins (Naczk and Shahidi, 2004). Some of those phenolic compounds have bioactive functions while others have no noticeable bioactivity, depending on their biosynthesis pathway. In general, the bioactive group of phenolic compounds are derived from shikimic acid and/or polyacetate biosynthesis pathways (Bernal et al., 2011).

Fruits and vegetables are a rich source of simple phenolics such as hydroxycinnamic acid conjugates and flavonoids. These compounds are considered to have protective effects against cancer and cardiovascular diseases due to their antioxidant activities (Boudet, 2007). Epidemiological studies have confirmed the health-promoting effects of phenolics by revealing that a high consumption of antioxidant-rich fruits and vegetables is inversely correlated with the incidence of cancer (Knekt et al., 2002). The possible mechanisms of the antioxidant activities are:

• decreasing accumulation of products from oxidant reactions (i.e., lipid peroxides),

• depressing oxidant products by inducing an external stress, and

• elevating the concentrations of endogenous antioxidants, or preventing their depletion caused by an external stress (Wildman, 2007).

Polyphenolic compounds are receiving increasing attention due to their positive roles in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, prevention of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and peripheral vascular diseases, and function as phytoestrogen (Boudet, 2007). As neuroprotective agents, polyphenolics are capable of reducing or blocking neuron death induced by oxidative stress, and exert benefits through different metabolic pathways including signaling cascades, anti-apoptotic processes or the synthesis/degradation of the amyloid β peptide (Ramassamy, 2006). Polyphenolics contained in red wine have been found to have cardioprotective function by interfering with the molecular processes related with initiation, progression, and rupture of atherosclerotic plaques (Szmitko and Verma, 2005).

Preparation of phenolic compounds from raw plant materials has been extensively studied. As plant phenolics exist in both simple and highly polymerized forms, and may also complex with carbohydrates, proteins and other plant components, the solubility of phenolics varies significantly (Naczk and Shahidi, 2004). Therefore, different solvent systems have been applied to extract specific groups of phenolic compounds. Water, ethanol, methanol, acetone, ethyl acetate, propanol, and dimethylformamide are commonly used. The combinations of those solvents have also been adopted to increase the extraction range of substances (Antolovich et al., 2000). The phenolic extracts are always a mixture of various types of phenolics and non-phenolic compounds. Therefore, additional steps are required to remove the undesired compounds. Petroleum ether, ethyl acetate, or diethyl ether extractions are usually added to concentrated phenolic extracts in order to remove lipids and unwanted polyphenols (Naczk and Shahidi, 2004). In terms of the fractionation and purification of phenolic compounds, solid phase extraction and different chromatography methods have been proven to be effective. Mateos et al. (2001) used diol-bonded phase cartridge to extract phenolics from olive oil. The oil sample was washed through the column with different solvent systems including hexane, a mixture of hexane/ethyl acetate (90:10, v/v), and methanol. The phenolics were found in the methanol eluted fraction. Mateus et al. (2001) employed a Fractogel (Toyopearl) HW-40(s) column to fractionate anthocyanin-derived pigments in red wines. The eluent was water–ethanol pigments.

In the biorefinery scenario, phenolic compounds, as valuable co-products, can be produced through either direct extraction of food or agricultural byproducts or fermentation of those byproducts as substrates. For example, olive mill wastewater has been subjected to different extraction and purification techniques to recover the polyphenols. Methods used include solid phase extraction (Bertin et al., 2011), integrated member system (Garcia-Castello et al., 2010), Azolla (aquatic fern) matrix, and active carbon adsorption (Ena et al., 2012). The major component of the total phenolics in olive mill wastewater is flavonoids with subgroups of flavanols and proanthocyanidins, which exhibited considerable antioxidant activity (El-Abbassi et al., 2012). Phenolic compounds have also been extracted from other food wastes, including potato peels (Oreopoulou and Russ, 2007), apple skins (Schieber et al., 2001), grape skins (Pinelo et al., 2006), carrot peels (Chantaro et al., 2008), raspberry waste (Laroze et al., 2010), and coffee byproducts (Murthy and Naidu, 2012).

Solid state fermentation (SSF) has been employed to increase the phenolic content in some food products as well as to produce phenolics from agro-industrial residue. Starzyńska-Janiszewska et al. (2008) have applied Rhizopus oligosporus to cooked seeds of grass peas, and found that the phenolic compound content had a great increase after fermentation. Wheat grain and soybean products have also been fermented by different fungal species. The resultant products exhibited higher content of phenolics and stronger antioxidant behavior (Bhanja et al., 2009; Singh et al., 2010). Agricultural and forestry wastes including straw, bagasse, stover, cobs, and husks are lignocellulosic biomass with lignin as one of the major chemical components. Filamentous fungi like white-rot fungi Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Trametes versicolor, Trametes hisuta, and Bjerkandera adusta have the capability of breaking down lignin to produce phenolic compounds, which can potentially increase the nutritional value of the materials as animal feed or soil fertilizer (Nigam and Pandey, 2009).

18.5.2 Alkaloids

Alkaloids are low molecular weight nitrogen-containing compounds found in about 20% of plant species (Facchini, 2001). They are mostly derived from the amino acids, phenylalanine, tyrosine, tryptophan, lysine, and ornithine. Alkaloids are commonly produced in response to stressed situations as secondary metabolites with characteristic toxicity and pharmacological activity. These properties were used by human beings for hunting, execution, and warfare in old times, but now are mostly used for the treatment of disease (Mann, 1992).

Plant-derived alkaloids currently used in clinical applications consist of the analgesics morphine and codeine, the anti-cancer agents vinblastine and taxol, the gout suppressant colchicine, the muscle relaxant (C)-tubocurarine, the antiarrythmic ajmaline, the antibiotic sanguinarine, and the sedative scopolamine (Facchini, 2001).

Glucosinolates, present in cruciferous vegetables (e.g., broccoli and brussel sprouts), are a class of alkaloids with a core sulfated thiocyanate group conjugating to thioglucose, and a side chain (Clarke, 2010). They are toxic at high doses, but under subtoxic level, glucosinolates serve as activators for liver detoxification enzymes and show protective effects against carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, and other forms of toxicity (Dillard and German, 2000). Most of the beneficial effects possessed by glucosinolates are attributable to the hydrolysis product isothiocyanates produced by the plant enzyme myrosinase or intestinal microflora. One example of isothiocyanate is sulforaphane (R-1-isothiocyanato-4-methylsulfinyl butane, SF), a hydrolysis product of glucosinolate in broccoli. It has been reported that SF has the potential to reduce the risk of various types of cancers, diabetes, atherosclerosis, respiratory diseases, neurodegenerative disorders, ocular disorders, and cardiovascular diseases (Elbarbry and Elrody, 2011). Indole-3-carbinol is another degradation product of glucosinolate that shows multiple anti-carcinogenic properties. These properties are delivered by changes in cell cycle progression, apoptosis, carcinogen bioactivation, and DNA repair (Weng et al., 2008). Both SF and indole-3-carbinol are widely available as dietary supplements.

18.5.3 Carotenoids

Carotenoids are terpene-derived pigments found in chloroplasts and chromoplasts of plants and photosynthetic organisms. They play a vital role in mediating the electron transfer process or protecting organisms from oxidation-induced damage. In humans, carotenoids have been linked with antioxidant activities and a series of disease prevention effects (Edge et al., 1997; Hughes, 2001). Therefore, carotenoids have received great commercial interest; as a result, various related products have appeared in the nutraceutical market.

Based on different chemical characteristics, carotenoids can be classified as xanthophylls and carotenes. Xanthophylls are carotenoids with oxygen present in the molecules, such as lutein, astaxanthin, and zeaxanthin. Carotenes are unoxygenated carotenoids which contain only carbon and hydrogen. Examples of carotenes include α-carotene, β-carotene, and lycopene (Cuttriss et al., 2011).

Carotenes are firstly known as vitamin A precursors and play an essential nutritional role. Recent studies have shown that β-carotene and lycopene also exhibit immune stimulatory and cancer preventive effects (Hughes, 2001). Xanthophyll typically cannot be converted to vitamin A in the human digestive tract; however, they can still offer protection for the biological system against free radicals.

Marketed carotenoids consist of β-carotene, astaxanthins, and more recently, lutein and lycopene (Walker et al., 2006). The production of carotenoids can be from both natural and synthetic sources. Astaxanthin, for instance, can be produced from the microalgae Haematococcus pluvialis. However, nearly all commercial astaxanthin for aquaculture applications is produced synthetically due to the low cost of synthetic production as compared to natural extraction. Recent advances for the understanding and manipulation of carotenoid metabolism have shown promise for producing carotenoids from natural sources. Examples of natural carotenoid producers include the fungus Blakeslea trispora, microalga Dunaliella salina, and yeast Phaffia rhodozyma (Enes and Saraiva, 1996; Hejazi et al., 2002; León et al., 2003; Denery et al., 2004). Utilization of substrates from agricultural byproducts, such as molasses and whey, also shows great potential in reducing the production cost from these microorganisms (Aksu and Eren, 2005).

18.6 Conclusion and future trends

Nutraceuticals, as health-enhancing and disease-preventing agents, have drawn increased attention, and thus, the market for various types of nutraceuticals has been expanding. As heart disease, cancer, osteoporosis, arthritis, and type II diabetes have become a major health concern worldwide; there has been greater awareness of the preventive effects of nutraceuticals, thus creating a bigger market for those products. The large demand for nutraceuticals is also associated with the trend of an aging population. As proportion of elderly people in the world population increases, an increased incidence of disease will occur, which can promote the use of various nutraceuticals to prevent and treat such disorders (Wildman, 2007).

By recognizing the growing nutraceutical market, food companiesdedicated hundreds of millions of dollars to discovering nutraceutical compounds and developing new products. With the advancement of biorefinery development in recent years, biotechnology companies are also jumping into this field, aiming to produce high-value nutraceuticals as part of product portfolios.

Conventional production of nutraceuticals is through extraction from natural sources, which is limited by the low content of target compounds, inefficient separation techniques, and high production cost. Current breakthroughs in biotechnology have enabled the production of high purity nutraceuticals in an economically viable way. For example, some bioactive compounds, such as DHA and EPA, naturally present in small amounts, can be produced by microorganisms through fermentation techniques. The use of agriculture byproducts or waste products shows a great potential to reduce the cost of bio-based nutraceutical production.Also, the establishment of advanced separation methods assists the enrichment and purification of bioactive compounds.

Producing bio-based nutraceuticals from renewable sources possesses tremendous potential in industrial applications. For example, Chi et al. (2007) used biodiesel-derived crude glycerol to replace glucose for microbial DHA production. This feedstock is less expensive and the DHA yield and productivity is similar to that from glucose culture, which indicates biodiesel-derived glycerol is a commercially competitive feedstock for DHA manufacture. Another example is ellagic acid production from pomegranate wastes. Ellagic acid is a natural phenolic antioxidant present in numerous fruits and vegetables. Recent studies have used pomegranate husks as support and nutrient sources for Aspergillus niger GH1 to produce ellagic acid (Aguilera-Carbo et al., 2008; Robledo et al., 2008). This process is economically attractive since 8 kg of ellagic acid can be produced from each ton of waste by solid state fermentation. Considering the commercial price of this compound and the low cost of feedstock, it is a quite profitable process from an industrial perspective. In addition to the aforementioned cases of producing bio-based nutraceuticals, there are still numerous examples which can illustrate the advantages of producing nutraceuticals within a biorefinery context. Therefore, bio-based nutraceuticals will no doubt promise value-added opportunities in the biorefinery process and new market opportunities for the food and pharmaceutical industry.

18.7 References

1. Abalde J, Betancourt L, Torres E, Cid A, Barwell C. Purification and characterization of phycocyanin from marine cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. Plant Sci. 1998;136:109.

2. Aguilera-Carbo A, Augur C, Prado-Barragan LA, Favela-Torres E, Aguilar CN. Microbial production of ellagic acid and biodegradation of ellagitannins. Appl Micro Biotech. 2008;78:189–199.

3. Ahmad MF, Ashraf SA, Ahmad FA, Ansari JA, Siddiquee MRA. Nutraceutical market and its regulation. Amer J Food Technol. 2011;6:342–347.

4. Ahmad A, Anjum FM, Zahoor T, Nawaz H, Dilshad SMR. Beta glucan: a valuable functional ingredient in foods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2012;52:201–212.

5. Akoh CC. Handbook of Functional Lipids Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2005.

6. Aksu Z, Eren AT. Carotenoids production by the yeast Rhodotorula mucilaginosa: use of agricultural wastes as a carbon source. Proc Biochem. 2005;40:2985–2991.

7. Amidon TE, Bujanovic B, Liu S, Howard JR. Commercializing biorefinery technology: a case for the multi-product pathway to a viable biorefinery. Forests. 2011;2:929–947.

8. Antolovich M, Prenzler P, Robards K, Ryan D. Sample preparation in the determination of phenolic compounds in fruits. Analyst. 2000;125:989–1009.

9. Athalye SK, Garcia RA, Wen ZY. Use of biodiesel-derived crude glycerol for producing eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) by the fungus Pythium irregulare. J Agri Food Chem. 2009;57:2739–2744.

10. Bajpai P, Bajpai PK, Ward OP. Production of docosahexaenoic acid by Thraustochytrium auerum. Appl Micro Biotech. 1991;35:706–710.

11. Barclay WR, Meager KM, Abril JR. Heterotrophic production of long chain omega-3 fatty acids utilizing algae and algae-like microorganisms. J Appl Phycol. 1994;6:123–129.

12. Berge JP, Debiton E, Dumay J, Durand P, Barthomeuf C. In vitro anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative activity of sulfolipids from the red alga Porphyridium cruentum. J Agri Food Chem. 2002;50:6227–6232.

13. Bernal J, Mendiola JA, Ibanez E, Cifuentes A. Advanced analysis of nutraceuticals. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2011;55:758–774.

14. Bertin L, Ferri F, Scoma A, Marchetti L, Fava F. Recovery of high added value natural polyphenols from actual olive mill wastewater through solid phase extraction. Chem Eng J. 2011;171:1287–1293.

15. Bhanja T, Kumari A, Banerjee R. Enrichment of phenolics and free radical scavenging property of wheat koji prepared with two filamentous fungi. Biores Technol. 2009;100:2861–2866.

16. Bird KT, Chiles TC, Longley RE, Kendrick AF, Kinkema MD. Agglutinins from marine macroalgae of the southeastern United States. J Appl Phycol. 1993;5:213–218.

17. Boudet AM. Evolution and current status of research in phenolic compounds. Phytochem. 2007;68:2722–2735.

18. Boussiba S, Richmond AE. Isolation and characterization of phycocyanins from the blue-green alga Spirulina platensis. Arch Microbiol. 1979;120:155–159.

19. Brown CE. Interactions among carnosine, anserine, ophidine and copper in biochemical adaptation. J Theor Biol. 1981;88:245–256.

20. Burkus Z, Temelli F. Stabilization of emulsions and foams using barley beta-glucan. Food Res Int. 2000;33:27–33.

21. Carlos Espin J, Teresa Garcia-Conesa M, Tomas-Barberan FA. Nutraceuticals: facts and fiction. Phytochem. 2007;68:2986–3008.

22. Chantaro P, Devahastin S, Chiewchan N. Production of antioxidant high dietary fiber powder from carrot peels. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2008;41:1987–1994.

23. Chi ZY, Pyle D, Wen ZY, Frear C, Chen SL. A laboratory study of producing docosahexaenoic acid from biodiesel-waste glycerol by microalgal fermentation. Proc Biochem. 2007;42:1537–1545.

24. Chichara G, Maeda Y, Hamuro J, Sasaki T, Fukuoka F. Inhibition of mouse sarcoma 180 by polysaccharides from Lentinu edodes (Berk.) Sing. Nature. 1969;222:687–688.

25. Christaki E, Florou-Paneri P, Bonos E. Microalgae: a novel ingredient in nutrition. Int J Food Sci Nutri. 2011;62:794–799.

26. Clarke DB. Glucosinolates, structures and analysis in food. Anal Methods. 2010;2:310–325.

27. Cocks S, Wrigley SK, Chicarellirobinson MI, Smith RM. High-performance liquid chromatography comparison of supercritical-fluid extraction and solvent-extraction of microbial fermentation products. J Chromatogr A. 1995;697:115–122.

28. Cohen Z, Ratledge C. Single Cell Oils: Microbial and Algal Oils Urbana, IL: AOCS Press; 2010.

29. Cohen Z, Didi S, Heimer YM. Overproduction of gamma-linolenic and eicosapentaenoic acids by algae. Plant Physiol. 1992;98:569–572.

30. Cuttriss AJ, Cazzonelli CI, Wurtzel ET, Pogson BJ. Carotenoids. Adv Bot Res. 2011;58:1–36.

31. DeFelice SL. The nutraceutical initiative: a recommendation for US economic and regulatory reforms. Genetic Engineering News. 1992;12:13–15.

32. DeFelice SL. The nutraceutical revolution: its impact on food industry R&D. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 1995;6:59–61.

33. de Swaaf ME, Pronk JT, Sijtsma L. Fed-batch cultivation of the docosahexaenoic-acid-producing marine alga Crypthecodinium cohnii on ethanol. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003;61:40–43.

34. Denery JR, Dragull K, Tang CS, Li QX. Pressurized fluid extraction of carotenoids from Haematococcus pluvialis and Dunaliella salina and kavalactones from Piper methysticum. Anal Chim Acta. 2004;501:175–181.

35. Dhingra D, Michael M, Rajput H, Patil RT. Dietary fiber in foods: a review. J Food Sci Technol. 2012;49:255–266.

36. Dillard CJ, German JB. Phytochemicals: nutraceuticals and human health. J Sci Food Agri. 2000;80:1744–1756.

37. Donova MV. Transformation of steroids by actinobacteria: a review. Appl Biochem Microbiol. 2007;43:1–14.

38. Edge R, McGarvey DJ, Truscott TG. The carotenoids as antioxidants – a review. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1997;41:189–200.

39. El-Abbassi A, Kiai H, Hafidi A. Phenolic profile and antioxidant activities of olive mill wastewater. Food Chem. 2012;132:406–412.

40. Elbarbry F, Elrody N. Potential health benefits of sulforaphane: a review of the experimental, clinical and epidemiological evidences and underlying mechanisms. J Med Plant Res. 2011;5:473–484.

41. Ena A, Pintucci C, Carlozzi P. The recovery of polyphenols from olive mill waste using two adsorbing vegetable matrices. J Biotechnol. 2012;157:573–577.

42. Enes I, Saraiva P. Optimization of operating strategies in beta-carotene microalgae bioreactors. Comput Chem Eng. 1996;20:S509–S514.

43. Facchini PJ. Alkaloid biosynthesis in plants: biochemistry, cell biology, molecular regulation, and metabolic engineering applications. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 2001;52:29–66.

44. Ferain T, Schanck AN, Delcour J. C-13 nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of glucose and citrate end products in an ldhL-ldhD double-knockout strain of Lactobacillus plantarum. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:7311–7315.

45. Figueroa-Gonzalez I, Quijano G, Ramirez G, Cruz-Guerrero A. Probiotics and prebiotics-perspectives and challenges. J Sci Food Agri. 2011;91:1341–1348.

46. Fleurence J. Seaweed proteins: biochemical, nutritional aspects and potential uses. Trends Food Sci Technol. 1999;10:25–28.

47. Fleurence J. Seaweed proteins. In: Yada RY, ed. Proteins in Food Processing. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd; 2004;197–213.

48. Francavilla M, Trotta P, Luque R. Phytosterols from Dunaliella tertiolecta and Dunaliella salina: a potentially novel industrial application. Biores Technol. 2010;101:4144–4150.

49. Franck A. Technological functionality of inulin and oligofructose. Br J Nutri. 2002;87:S287–S291.

50. Ganzle MG. Enzymatic synthesis of galacto-oligosaccharides and other lactose derivatives (hetero-oligosaccharides) from lactose. Int Dairy J. 2011;22:116–122.

51. Garcia-Castello E, Cassano A, Criscuoli A, Conidi C, Drioli E. Recovery and concentration of polyphenols from olive mill wastewaters by integrated membrane system. Water Res. 2010;44:3883–3892.

52. Gibson GR, Probert HM, Van Loo J, Rastall RA, Roberfroid MB. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: updating the concept of prebiotics. Nutr Res Rev. 2004;17:259–275.

53. Gullon P, Gonzalez-Munoz MJ, Parajo JC. Manufacture and prebiotic potential of oligosaccharides derived from industrial solid wastes. Biores Technol. 2011;102:6112–6119.

54. Gundermann KJ, Kuenker A, Kuntz E, Drozdzik M. Activity of essential phospholipids (EPL) from soybean in liver diseases. Pharmacol Rep. 2011;63:643–659.

55. Guo XF, Han DM, Xi HP, et al. Extraction of pectin from navel orange peel assisted by ultra-high pressure, microwave or traditional heating: a comparison. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;88:441–448.

56. Gustafson KR, Cardellina JH, Fuller RW, et al. AIDS-antiviral sulfolipids from cyanobacteria (blue-green algae). J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989;81:1254–1258.

57. Hamann MT, Scheuer PJ. Kahalalide F: a bioactive depsipeptide from the sacoglossan mollusk Elysia rufescens and the green alga Bryopsis sp. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:5825–5826.

58. Harnedy PA, Fitzgerald RJ. Bioactive proteins, peptides, and amino acids from macroalgae. J Phycol. 2011;47:218–232.

59. Hejazi MA, de Lamarliere C, Rocha JMS, Vermue M, Tramper J, Wijffels RH. Selective extraction of carotenoids from the microalga Dunaliella salina with retention of viability. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002;79:29–36.

60. Hermann T. Industrial production of amino acids by coryneform bacteria. J Biotechnol. 2003;104:155–172.

61. Herrera A, Boussiba S, Napoleone V, Hohlberg A. Recovery of c-phycocyanin from the cyanobacterium Spirulina maxima. J Appl Phycol. 1989;1:325–331.

62. Herrero M, Cifuentes A, Ibanez E. Sub- and supercritical fluid extraction of functional ingredients from different natural sources: plants, foodby-products, algae and microalgae: a review. Food Chem. 2006;98:136–148.

63. Hicks KB, Moreau RA. Phytosterols and phytostanols: functional food cholesterol busters. Food Technol Magazine. 2001;55:63–67.

64. Hugenholtz J, Smid EJ. Nutraceutical production with food-grade microorganisms. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2002;13:497–507.

65. Hughes DA. Dietary carotenoids and human immune function. Nutr. 2001;17:823–827.

66. Ikeda I, Sugano M. Inhibition of cholesterol absorption by plant sterols for mass intervention. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1998;9:527–531.

67. Ikeda I, Matsuoka R, Hamada T, et al. Cholesterol esterase accelerates intestinal cholesterol absorption. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002;1571:34–44.

68. Imeson A. Food Stabilisers, Thickening and Gelling Agents Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.

69. International Conference of Harmonisation. International Conference of Harmonisation. Available from: http://www.ich.org/; (accessed 15 June 2012).

70. Jiao GL, Yu GL, Zhang JZ, Ewart HS. Chemical structures and bioactivities of sulfated polysaccharides from marine algae. Mar Drugs. 2011;9:196–223.

71. Jiménez C, Cossío BR, Labella D, Niell FX. The feasibility of industrial production of Spirulina (Arthrospira) in Southern Spain. Aquaculture. 2003;217:179–190.

72. Johnson MB, Wen ZY. Production of biodiesel fuel from the microalga Schizochytrium limacinum by direct transesterification of algal biomass. Energy Fuels. 2009;23:5179–5183.

73. Kendrick A, Ratledge C. Lipids of selected molds grown for production of n-3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Lipids. 1992;27:15–20.

74. Knekt P, Kumpulainen J, Jarvinen R, et al. Flavonoid intake and risk of chronic diseases. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76:560–568.

75. Komatsu N, Okubo S, Kikumoto S, Kimura K, Saito G, Sakai S. Host-mediated antitumor action of schizophyllan, a glucan produced by Schizophyllum commune. Gann. 1969;60:137–144.

76. Korhonen H. Milk-derived bioactive peptides: from science to applications. J Funct Foods. 2009;1:177–187.

77. Korhonen H, Pihlanto A. Food-derived bioactive peptides – opportunities for designing future foods. Curr Pharm Des. 2003;9:1297–1308.

78. Kralovec JA, Zhang SC, Zhang W, Barrow CJ. A review of the progress in enzymatic concentration and microencapsulation of omega-3 rich oil from fish and microbial sources. Food Chem. 2012;131:639–644.

79. Küllenberg D, Taylor LA, Schneider M, Massing U. Health effects of dietary phospholipids. Lipids Health Dis. 2012;11:3.

80. Laroze L, Soto C, Zúñiga ME. Phenolic antioxidants extraction from raspberry wastes assisted by-enzymes. Electron J Biotechnol. 2010;13:6.

81. Lee YK. Commercial production of microalgae in the Asia-Pacific rim. J Appl Phycol. 1997;9:403–411.

82. León R, Martín M, Vigara J, Vilchez C, Vega JM. Microalgae mediated photoproduction of β-carotene in aqueous-organic two phase systems. Biomol Eng. 2003;20:177–182.

83. Liang Y, Garcia RA, Piazza GJ, Wen ZY. Nonfeed application of rendered animal proteins for microbial production of eicosapentaenoic acid by the fungus Pythium irregulare. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59:11990–11996.

84. Loya S, Reshef V, Mizrachi E, et al. The inhibition of the reverse transcriptase of HIV-1 by the natural sulfoglycolipids from cyanobacteria: contribution of different moieties to their high potency. J Nat Prod. 1998;61:891–895.

85. Luber-Narod J, Smith B, Grant W, et al. In vitro safety toxicology of kahalalide F, a marine natural product with chemotherapeutic potential against selected solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:4510S 4510S.

86. Mann J. Murder, Magic and Medicine Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992.

87. Mateos R, Espartero JL, Trujillo M, et al. Determination of phenols, flavones, and lignans in virgin olive oils by solid-phase extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array ultraviolet detection. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49:2185–2192.

88. Mateus N, Silva AMS, Vercauteren J, de Freitas V. Occurrence of anthocyanin-derived pigments in red wines. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49:4836–4840.

89. Maxwell EG, Belshaw NJ, Waldron KW, Morris VJ. Pectin-an emerging new bioactive food polysaccharide. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2012;24:64–73.

90. Minkova KM, Tchernov AA, Tchorbadjieva MI, Fournadjieva ST, Antova RE, Busheva MC. Purification of C-phycocyanin from Spirulina (Arthrospira) fusiformis. J Biotechnol. 2003;102:55–59.

91. Moreau RA, Whitaker BD, Hicks KB. Phytosterols, phytostanols, and their conjugates in foods: structural diversity, quantitative analysis, and health-promoting uses. Prog Lipid Res. 2002;41:457–500.

92. Mori T, O’Keefe BR, Sowder II RC, et al. Isolation and characterization of griffithsin, a novel HIV-inactivating protein, from the red alga Griffithsia sp. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:9345–9353.

93. Murata M, Nakazoe J. Production and use of marine algae in Japan. Jpn Agric Res Quart. 2001;35:281–290.

94. Murthy PS, Naidu MM. Recovery of phenolic antioxidants and functional compounds from coffee industry by-products. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012;5:897–903.

95. Naczk M, Shahidi F. Extraction and analysis of phenolics in food. J Chromatogr A. 2004;1054:95–111.

96. Nakashima H, Kido Y, Kobayashi N, Motoki Y, Neushul M, Yamamoto N. Purification and characterization of an avian myeloblastosis and human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase inhibitor, sulfated polysaccharides extracted from sea algae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987a;31:1524–1528.

97. Nakashima H, Yoshida O, Tochikura TS, et al. Sulfation of polysaccharides generates potent and selective inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus infection and replication in vitro. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1987b;78:1164–1168.

98. Neves AR, Ramos A, Shearman C, Gasson MJ, Almeida JS, Santos H. Metabolic characterization of Lactococcus lactis deficient in lactate dehydrogenase using in vivo C-13-NMR. Eur J Biochem. 2000;267:3859–3868.

99. Nigam P, Pandey A. Biotechnology for Agro-Industrial Residues Utilisation Dordrecht: Springer; 2009.

100. Niu JF, Wang GC, Lin XZ, Zhou BC. Large-scale recovery of C-phycocyanin from Spirulina platensis using expanded bed adsorption chromatography. J Chromatogr B. 2007;850:267–276.

101. Ohta K, Mizushina Y, Hirata N, et al. Sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol, KM043, a new potent inhibitor of eukaryotic DNA polymerases and HIV-reverse transcriptase type 1 from a marine red alga, Gigartina tenella. Chem Pharm Bull. 1998;46:684–686.

102. Office of Dietary Supplements (n.d.) Dietary Supplements. Office of Dietary Supplements. Available from: http://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/DietarySupplements-HealthProfessional/ (accessed 15 June 2012).

103. Office of Legislative Policy and Analysis (n.d.) Legislative Updates: 108th Congress. Office of Legislative Policy and Analysis. Available from: http://olpa.od.nih.gov/legislation/108/pendinglegislation/dietary.asp (accessed 15 June 2012).

104. Oreopoulou V, Russ W. Utilization of By-Products and Treatment of Waste in the Food Industry New York: Springer; 2007.

105. Oshida K, Shimizu T, Takase M, Tamura Y, Shimizu T, Yamashiro Y. Effects of dietary sphingomyelin on central nervous system myelination in developing rats. Pediatric Res. 2003;53:589–593.

106. Owusu-Apenten R. Bioactive Peptides: Applications for Improving Nutrition and Health Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2010.

107. Pang X, Yao W, Yang X, et al. Purification, characterization and biological activity on hepatocytes of a polysaccharide from Flammulina velutipes mycelium. Carbohydr Polym. 2007;70:291–297.

108. Pardo B, Paz-Ares L, Tabernero J, et al. Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of kahalalide F administered weekly as a 1-hour infusion to patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Caner Res. 2008;14:1116–1123.

109. Park AR, Oh DK. Galacto-oligosaccharide production using microbial beta-galactosidase: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;85:1279–1286.

110. Patil G, Chethana S, Sridevi AS, Raghavarao KSMS. Method to obtain C-phycocyanin of high purity. J Chromatogr A. 2006;1127:76–81.

111. Peiretti PG, Meineri G. Effects of diets with increasing levels of Spirulina platensis on the carcass characteristics, meat quality and fatty acid composition of growing rabbits. Livestock Sci. 2011;140:218–224.

112. Pfeuffer M, Schrezenmeir J. Bioactive substances in milk with properties decreasing risk of cardiovascular diseases. Br J Nutr. 2000;84:S155–S159.

113. Pinelo M, Arnous A, Meyer AS. Upgrading of grape skins: significance of plant cell-wall structural components and extraction techniques for phenol release. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2006;17:579–590.

114. Provencio M, Izquierdo A, Vinolas N, et al. Phase II clinical trial of kahalalide F (KF) as a second line therapy in patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ann Oncol. 2006;17(ix):225.

115. Pulz O. Photobioeractors: production systems for phototrophic microorganisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;57:287–293.

116. Ramassamy C. Emerging role of polyphenolic compounds in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases: a review of their intracellular targets. Eur J Pharmacol. 2006;545:51–64.

117. Ratledge C, Kanagachandran K, Anderson AJ, Grantham DJ, Stephenson JC. Production of docosahexaenoic acid by Crypthecodinium cohnii grown in a pH-auxostat culture with acetic acid as principal carbon source. Lipids. 2001;36:1241–1246.

118. Robledo A, Aguilera-Carbó A, Rodriguez R, Martinez JL, Garza Y, Aguilar CN. Ellagic acid production by Aspergillus niger in solid state fermentation of pomegranate residues. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;35:507–513.

119. Salamia M, Moosavi-Movahedi AA, Moosavi-Movahedi F, et al. Biological activity of camel milk casein following enzymatic digestion. J Dairy Res. 2011;78:471–478.

120. Salminen S, Isolauri E. Intestinal colonization, microbiota, and probiotics. J Pediatrics. 2006;149:S115–S120.

121. Sanda S, Leustek T, Theisen MJ, Garavito RM, Benning C. Recombinant Arabidopsis SQD1 converts UDP-glucose and sulfite to the sulfolipid head group precursor UDP-sulfoquinovose in vitro. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:3941–3946.

122. Sato MDF, Rigoni DC, Canteri MHG, Petkowicz CLDO, Nogueira A, Wosiacki G. Chemical and instrumental characterization of pectin from dried pomace of eleven apple cultivars. Acta Sci Agron. 2011;33:383–389.

123. Schieber A, Stintzing FC, Carle R. By-products of plant food processing as a source of functional compounds – recent developments. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2001;12:401–413.

124. Schlimme E, Meisel H. Bioactive peptides derived from milk proteins: structural, physiological and analytical aspects. Nahrung Food. 1995;39:1–20.

125. Shiu CT, Lee TM. Ultraviolet-B-induced oxidative stress and responses of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle in a marine macroalga Ulva fasciata. J Exp Bot. 2005;56:2851–2865.

126. Singh HB, Singh BN, Singh SP, Nautiyal CS. Solid-state cultivation of Trichoderma harzianum NBRI-1055 for modulating natural antioxidants in soybean seed matrix. Biores Technol. 2010;101:6444–6453.

127. Singh S, Kate BN, Banerjee UC. Bioactive compounds from cyanobacteria and microalgae: an overview. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2005;25:73–95.

128. Smaali I, Jazzar S, Soussi A, Muzard M, Aubry N, Marzouki MN. Enzymatic synthesis of fructooligosaccharides from date by-products using an immobilized crude enzyme preparation of beta-D-fructofuranosidase from Aspergillus awamori NBRC 4033. Biotechnol Bioproc Eng. 2012;17:385–392.

129. Smit AJ. Medicinal and pharmaceutical uses of seaweed natural products: a review. J Appl Phycol. 2004;16:245–262.

130. Soni B, Kalavadia B, Trivedi U, Madamwar D. Extraction, purification and characterization of phycocyanin from Oscillatoria quadripunctulata – isolated from the rocky shores of Bet-Dwarka, Gujarat, India. Proc Biochem. 2006;41:2017–2023.

131. Spolaore P, Joannis-Cassan C, Duran E, Isambert A. Commercial applications of microalgae. J Biosci Bioeng. 2006;101:87–96.

132. Srivastava R, Kulshreshtha DK. Bioactive polysaccharides from plants. Phytochem. 1989;28:2877–2883.

133. Starzyńska-Janiszewska A, Stodolak B, Jamróz M. Antioxidant properties of extracts from fermented and cooked seeds of Polish cultivars of Lathyrus sativus. Food Chem. 2008;109:285–292.

134. Suárez Y, González L, Cuadrado A, Berciano M, Lafarga M, Muñoz A. Kahalalide F, a new marine-derived compound, induces oncosis in human prostate and breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2003;2:863–872.

135. Szmitko PE, Verma S. Antiatherogenic potential of red wine: clinician update. Am J Physiol-Heart Circ Physiol. 2005;288:H2023–H2030.

136. Teruya T, Konishi T, Uechi S, Tamaki H, Tako M. Anti-proliferative activity of oversulfated fucoidan from commercially cultured Cladosiphon okamuranus TOKIDA in U937 cells. Int J Bioll Macromol. 2007;41:221–226.

137. Trautwein EA, Duchateau GSMJE, Lin Y, Mel’nikov SM, Molhuizen HOF, Ntanios FY. Proposed mechanisms of cholesterol-lowering action of plant sterols. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. 2003;105:171–185.

138. U.S. Food Drug Administration. Dietary Supplement Current Good Manufacturing Practices (CGMPs) and Interim Final Rule (IFR) Facts Food and Drug Administration. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/Food/DietarySupplements/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/RegulationsLaws/ucm110858.htm; 2009; (accessed 15 June 2012).

139. Walker T, Drapcho C, Chen F. Bioprocessing technology for production of nutraceutical compounds. In: Shi J, ed. Functional Food Ingredients and Nutraceuticals. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; 2006;211–236.

140. Weng J-R, Tsai C-H, Kulp SK, Chen C-S. Indole-3-carbinol as a chemopreventive and anti-cancer agent. Cancer Lett. 2008;262:153–163.

141. Wiederschain G. Polysaccharides: Structural diversity and functional versatility. Biochem (Moscow). 2007;72:675.

142. Wijesinghe WAJP, Jeon Y-J. Biological activities and potential industrial applications of fucose rich sulfated polysaccharides and fucoidans isolated from brown seaweeds: a review. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;88:13–20.

143. Wildman RC. Handbook of Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2007.

144. Yagita A. Interleukin 12 inducer and medical composition 1997; US patent application 6238660.

145. Yang W, Pei F, Shi Y, Zhao L, Fang Y, Hu Q. Purification, characterization and anti-proliferation activity of polysaccharides from Flammulina velutipes. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;88:474–480.

146. Zaloga GP, Siddiqui RA. Biologically active dietary peptides. MiniRev Med Chem. 2004;4:815–821.

147. Zhang YM, Chen F. A simple method for efficient separation and purification of c-phycocyanin and allophycocyanin from Spirulina platensis. Biotechnol Tech. 1999;13:601–603.

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset