Index

0-9, and Symbols

360 Core, 61, 64, 100, 133
360 Counter, 30, 100
360 Link, 61, 64–5, 100, 132
360 MARC Updates, 34–5, 60–1, 65, 76, 79–80, 88, 100
360 Resource Manager, 64–5, 73, 79, 99–101, 151
360 Search, 120, 132

A

A–Z title list, 20, 52, 54, 73–4, 76, 78–9, 83, 100, 110
Aalto University, 174
Aarhus University, 99–101
Academic Search Premier, 118
access
archives and special collections, 21
consortial environment, 65, 133, 150, 157
cross-unit collaboration, 30, 34, 46, 49
e-books, 176, 182–7, 189
e-journals, 34, 40–1, 43–4, 189
improvement through data analysis, 83
multimedia, 127
print resources, 157, 157
responsibilities, 17, 26, 28, 32, 50, 52–4, 63–4, 99, 187
role of cataloging, 95
shift from ownership, 1, 4–6, 58, 85–6, 112, 121
systems and tools, 52–4, 58, 72–3, 76–7, 104, 110, 128–9
troubleshooting, 18–19, 22–3, 27, 30, 34, 44, 48–50, 52, 60–1, 187
user expectations, 31, 82, 110
workflow, 51–2, 59, 65, 186
blurring with electronic resources management, 15, 17–19, 22–5, 27, 33, 50–1, 54, 187
acquisitions
and cooperative collection development, 21
and ERMS, 27, 59, 62, 74, 76, 82
and ILS, 4, 6–8, 27, 62, 82, 87
and resource management systems, 87, 103
merging with cataloging, 8, 12, 16, 26, 29–31
merging with electronic resources, 26, 29–31, 35, 41, 52, 58
new models for electronic resources, 21, 94
patron-driven
budget implications, 5, 19, 94, 155, 164
collection development, 176–7, 187
implementation, 63, 102, 155, 163–4
shift from ownership to access, 5
system issues, 188
workflow issues, 21, 57, 177
placement of unit, 22, 184–6
responsibilities for library positions, 14, 28, 45–6, 56, 60, 62–3, 93–4, 99
responsibilities related to electronic resources, 3, 15, 33, 40, 129, 136
workflow and systems comparison to electronic resources, 58–9, 177, 185, 188
Amazon, 125, 174
American Chemical Society, 154
American Libraries, 42, 47
American Library Association, 72
Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, 144
API (application programming interface), 65, 84, 86, 122, 129, 155, 163
AquaBrowser, 120
ArticleFirst, 119
Association of Research Libraries (ARL), 25, 42, 47, 50, 147
AUT University, 131
authentication, 34–5, 50, 53, 98, 160, 164
patron privacy, 91–2

B

Baker & Taylor, 33
BeBook, 174
Beppu, Taeko, 63–5
bibliographic instruction See instruction, library
bibliographic records See MARC
Blackboard Collaborate, 162
Blacklight, 116
Bookeen CyBook Opus, 174
Boston College, 88, 101–4
Boston Library Consortium, 102
Bowling Green State University, 15–16
Brigham Young University, 78
Brownlie, Helen, 131–4
Brubaker, Noah, 158–61
Bryn Mawr College, 150
budget
allocation, 5, 94, 186
consortia, 144–6, 148, 154–5, 163
cuts, 4, 17, 30, 43, 57, 60, 62, 114, 155
portion dedicated to electronic resources, 11, 19, 47, 49, 54–5
relationship to systems, 2, 9
responsibilities, 14, 17, 22, 53, 55, 102
bX Recommender Service, 103

C

Cambridge Scientific Abstracts, 101
cataloging
and ERMS, 77
and ILS, 6–7, 70, 77, 87, 185
and resource management systems, 87, 94–5
cooperative, 21, 152
merging with acquisitions, 8, 12, 16, 26, 29–31
merging with electronic resources, 12, 22, 26, 29–31, 58
placement of unit, 32–4
responsibilities for electronic resources, 33–4, 40, 51–2, 70, 129, 136
responsibilities for library positions, 42, 45–6, 49–50, 60, 102–3
units/departments, 185
workflow/systems comparison to electronic resources, 51, 58–9, 185
central index, 111–12, 118–20, 125, 133, 135
Central Search, 117
Chandler, Adam, 72
Chilifresh.com, 125
Christensen, Vibeke, 99–101
Chronicle of Higher Education, 42
Claremont Colleges Library, 122
CLOCKSS, 182
cloud-based systems and computing, 7, 25–6, 86–8, 91–2, 103, 129, 143
collection development
blurring with electronic resources management, 15, 17–19, 27, 35, 185–8
blurring with technical services, 24–5, 41
collaborative, 21, 144
library systems, 83, 87, 92, 96, 185
responsibilities, 14, 25, 43, 45, 48
shift from ownership to access, 5
units/departments, 32–3, 102
College & Research Libraries News, 42, 45–6
College Center for Library Automation, 162
Columbia University, 20
Consiran consortium, 145
consortia, library, 141–64
collaborative purchasing (case studies), 61, 65, 102, 134, 163–4
collaborative purchasing (general), 92, 142–6, 150, 154–5, 157–8, 189
collaborative technical services, 20–1
electronic resource management workflow, 49
shared storage, 60, 144, 150, 157
shared systems, 61, 65, 79, 92, 99–102, 131–6, 142–4, 148–51, 155–64
consortia, university, 141–2
Consortium of Academic and Research Libraries in Illinois, 150, 152
Consortium of Academic Libraries of Catalonia, 147
Consortium of Core Electronic Resources, Taiwan, 148
CONTENTdm, 62, 161
Copyright Clearance Center, 6
CORAL, 80, 96–9
CORE (Cost of Resource Exchange), 82, 92
Cornell University, 12, 20, 72
Council of Atlantic University Libraries/Le Conseil des bibliothèques universitaires de l'Atlantique, 134–6
coverage, electronic resources See electronic resources coverage
CUFTS, 76, 99

D

Danish National Library Consortium, 99
data management
among library systems, 53–4, 82, 122, 184
cataloging, 3, 94–5, 129
knowledge base, 90
responsibilities, 18, 20, 24–5, 27, 59, 93, 110, 131, 153, 155
security, 90–2
user experience and discovery, 7, 54, 61, 122, 128–9
within ERMS, 74
databases
as organizational tools, 20, 70, 79, 133, 136
electronic resources
access and management, 16, 49, 64, 70–1, 74, 97, 101, 110, 148, 158
acquisition, 43, 60, 64
cataloging, 34, 60, 124
emergence, 3, 40
simultaneous search, 112, 117, 125, 132–3
datasets (electronic resources), 24, 60, 90, 127
digital collections of primary materials, 3, 34–5, 86, 90, 120
digital rights management (DRM), 6, 21, 27, 90, 93, 153–4, 170, 177, 182–3, 185, 189
digitization, 121, 146, 148–9
discovery
case studies, 61, 64–5, 101, 103–4, 131–6, 158–63
comparison to commercial, 10, 110, 112, 117–19, 124–5
data management, 25
e-books, 170, 185, 189
in consortial environment, 61, 155–6, 158–63
in resource management environment, 85, 87–8, 91, 94
indexed services, 57, 61, 112, 118–22
responsibilities, 17, 58
role of cataloging, 21, 95, 124
role of standards, 83
tie to electronic resources management, 7, 12, 54–5, 110, 128–9
DLF ERMI (Digital Library Federation Electronic Resource Management Initiative), 72–3, 75–6, 102
Drexel University, 43
Dublin Core, 42, 124
Dygert, Claire, 161–4

E

E ink, 174–5
e–books, 169–89
acquisition models and issues, 5, 35, 60, 63, 102, 143, 155, 163–4, 175–8, 186–7
approval plan, 176–7
consortial environment, 155, 158, 163–4, 189
digital rights management, 154, 170, 177, 182–3, 185, 189
growth of, 26
hosting, 150
impact on existing workflow, 35, 57, 170–1, 177
library systems, 27, 64, 80, 100
role of cataloging and metadata, 90, 152
user preference and use of, 178–82, 189
workflow for, 27, 61, 90, 100, 102, 150, 152, 184–8
e-journals
access, 40, 43, 70, 73, 76, 110, 189
acquisition models and issues, 3, 5, 40, 43, 94
comparison to e-books, 169–70, 172, 177–8
consortial environment, 142–3, 147, 153–4, 163
digital rights management, 153–4, 164, 183
e-readers, 175
impact on existing workflow/staffing, 3, 39–40, 42–4, 51–2, 60, 64, 80, 177, 184, 187
relationship to print journals, 16, 34, 40, 51, 56, 62
e-readers, 26, 171–5, 181–2
EBL, 176, 179
Ebrary, 61, 175–6, 179
EBSCO, 65, 83, 118, 120, 125, 136, 176
EBSCO Discovery Service, 133, 162–3
EBSCOHost, 120
EDI, 103
Electronic Book Center, OhioLINK, 150
Electronic Information for Libraries (eIFL.net), 149
electronic resources See also acquisitions merging
with cataloging, merging
with electronic resources
coverage, 43, 51, 53, 62, 70, 75–6, 80, 91, 128, 133, 151, 161
e-only collection development, 40, 42–3, 51, 53, 60, 103
hosting locally, 150, 157
introduction to libraries, 1–2
sharing within consortia, 20–1, 162–4
units/departments, 16–18, 26, 29–32, 51–2, 184, 187–8
Electronic Resources in Libraries listserv, 55
electronic resources librarian, 13–16, 29–30, 42–53, 55, 58, 69–74, 77, 93, 109–11, 128–9
Electronic Resource Management Initiative See DLF ERMI
electronic resource management system (ERMS)
as transitional software, 27, 69, 71, 84–6, 93, 95–6
components shared with resource management systems, 87–8, 90, 92, 95, 103
consortial implementation, 79, 99–101, 150–1, 156, 162
development, 70–4
e-books, 80, 100, 184, 188
extension across library, 27, 59
home-grown systems, 71–2, 75, 78, 80, 87, 96–9, 102
implementation, 62–5, 74–82
relationship to staffing, 19, 78–9, 93
workflow, 58–9, 63–5, 77–81, 93, 96–9, 136, 151
Elsevier, 145, 154
Encore Synergy, 120
Endeavor, 78, 99 See also LinkFinderPlus Meridian
Endeca, 61, 115–16, 162
enterprise systems, campus, 25, 83, 86, 89, 94, 156, 161
ERLIC, 72
ERM (III), 62, 73, 75–6, 79–80, 82
extensible Catalog (XC), 65, 116, 122
EZProxy, 35, 53

F

federated search See metasearch
FERPA (Federal Educational Rights and Privacy Act), 92
Florida Center for Library Automation, 161–4
Florida State University System, 161–3
Foxit eSlick, 174

G

George Mason University, 126
Glasgow University, 75–6
GOKb (Global Open Knowledgebase), 91
Gold Rush, 78
Google Maps, 125
Google Scholar, 54, 117–19
Google Search Appliance, 118

H

Hamaker, Chuck, 32–5
Harrassowitz, 73
Hathi Trust, 121
Haverford College, 150
Heet, Benjamin, 96–9
HERMIS, 73
hosted services, 19, 90, 124, 129, 131, 134, 159, 161
hosting electronic resources See electronic resources hosting locally
H.W. Wilson, 119

I

Independent Colleges and Universities of Florida, 163
Index Data, 119
Indiana State University, 29–32
Indiana University, 52, 89
Infor Library and Information Solutions, 99
information technology in libraries See library systems
INNOPAC library system, 144
Innovative Interfaces, Inc. (III), 62, 88, 97, 120 See also ERM (III) Millennium Sierra WebBridge
institutional repositories, 112, 120, 146
instruction, library, 24, 45–8, 53
integrated library system (ILS) See also Online Public Access Catalog (OPAC)/online catalog vendors
case studies, 61–2, 64–5, 98, 101–4, 132–4, 136, 159–60
circulation data, 17
consortial environment, 143, 148, 156
effect on/role of technical services, 1–4, 95, 127, 136
electronic resource management, 27, 40–1, 51–4, 69–88, 184–5
integration with discovery services, 121, 128–9
stalled development, 113–14
standardization, 58
interlibrary loan, 5, 27, 33, 62, 76, 3, 146, 154, 156, 188
International Coalition of Library Consortia (ICOLC), 153
Intota, 88–9
IOTA (Improving Open URLs Through Analytics), 83
Iowa State University, 52
iPad, 175

J

JISC, 91
Joint University Libraries Advisory Committee consortium, Hong Kong, 145

K

Kagawa, Tomoko, 63–5
Kataoka, Shin, 63–5
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 88, 103
KBART (Knowledge Bases and Related Tools), 82, 90
Kemp, Rebecca L., 59–63
Kilb, Megan Griffin, 59–63
Kindle, 174–5
Kuali Foundation, 89 See also OLE
Kyushu University, 63–5, 122

L

Langhurst, Andrea, 96–9
Lehigh University, 14, 89
Lesotho Library Consortium, 144
LibGuides, 124 LibQUAL+ 6
library automation, 1–11, 13–14, 19, 28, 45, 83–5, 110, 115, 143–4, 148
Library Consortium of New Zealand, 131–4
Library of Congress, 113
Library Services and Technology Act, 173
shared, 20, 65, 133, 149–50, 155–61
standardization among libraries, 58
LibX, 54, 125–6
licensing
access services, 6, 21, 27, 128, 151
as function, 24, 27, 70, 93, 170–1, 187–8
accommodation within traditional structures, 3, 13, 16–17, 40–1, 43–6, 48–53, 56
collaborative process, 33, 35, 60–1, 64
collection development, 154, 182
consortial issues, 119, 132, 141, 143, 146, 153–4, 158, 163
standards, 82
tracking license data, 30, 62–5, 70–1, 74–6, 80, 88, 91–2, 97–8, 101–2
link resolvers See OpenURL resolvers
linked data, 91, 126, 130
LinkFinderPlus, 132
Lyandres, Natasha, 96–9
Lyrasis, 102, 144

M

Malott, Robin, 96–9
Mango, 162
MARC
batch processing, 3, 30, 33, 61, 84, 95, 129, 152–3, 184
consortial issues, 20, 160–1, 164
format, 115, 156
records, 3, 8–9, 40, 44, 75, 103–4, 116–17, 124, 133–6, 177
responsibilities, 8, 12, 29, 31, 34, 52, 60, 70, 127
MARC record service, 58, 73, 83, 133 See also 360 MARC Updates
MarcEdit, 152
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), 41, 72
MediaLab Solutions, 115
Memorial University Libraries, 134–6
Meridian, 73, 78, 99–100 metadata
effect of electronic resources, 2–3, 90–1
outside ILS, 52, 77
relationship to discovery services, 25, 65, 101, 110, 117, 119–20, 128–9, 135, 160–1
work, 12, 21–2, 25, 30, 58, 93–4, 102, 110, 131
MetaLib, 98, 159–60, 163
metasearch, 54, 88, 110–11, 117–21, 126, 132, 135, 155
Microsoft Access, 147
Microsoft Excel, 62, 64–5, 147
Microsoft Live Search Academic, 117
Millennium, 61–2, 75
MINES for Libraries, 147
Modern Language Association, 119
Moon, Young Joo, 101–4
multimedia, 123, 127, 172

N

National Information Standards Organization (NISO), 72
National Library of Australia, 116
National Library of Medicine, 119
NELLCO, 157
NERL (Northeast Region Library) consortium, 61, 102, 157
NetLibrary, 119, 175–6
next-generation library systems, 85, 88, 143, 155, 185, 188 See also web-scale library systems
catalogs, 111–13
need for, 11
opinions of (case studies), 62, 65, 98–9
Nook, 174
North Carolina State University, 76, 115
Northwestern University, 16, 80
NoveList, 125

O

Oakland University, 79
OCLC, 65, 88–9, 103, 119, 121, 129, 152, 176
Ohio Library and Information Network (OhioLINK), 25, 142, 148, 150, 152, 157
Ohio State University, 75
Old Dominion University, 51
OLE (Open Library Environment), 65, 88–9, 91
ONIX-PL (ONIX for Publications Licenses), 82, 92
Online Public Access Catalog (OPAC)/online catalog, 110, 113–17, 122, 124–6
case studies, 61–2, 104, 133–4, 136, 159, 162
electronic resources, 73
relationship between technical and library systems, 129
relationship between technical and public services, 7, 44, 46, 127
Ontario Council of University Libraries, 150–1, 157
open source, 150
discovery tools, 116, 122, 160
ERMS, 72, 76, 80, 85, 99
next-generation library systems, 62, 87
OpenURL resolvers See also 360 Link LinkFinderPlus SFX WebBridge
responsibilities, 15, 48, 52–4, 58, 73–4
role in electronic resource management, 58, 76–9, 83, 87–90, 95, 110, 126, 128, 135–6
role in patron-driven acquisitions, 6
standards, 83
Orange County Library System, 124
Orbis Cascade Alliance, 155
Oregon Health & Science University, 75
Oregon State University, 122
organizational structure and change, 1, 7–35, 45, 47–8, 50, 53, 63–4, 93–5, 184
Otago Polytechnic, 133
Oxford Reference Online, 179
Oxford University Press, 177

P

PALNI Technology Advisory Group (PTAG), 159–60
patron-driven acquisitions See acquisitions patron-driven
Penn State University, 72, 174
Portico, 182
preservation, 14, 25, 127, 146, 182, 186
Primo/Primo Central, 103–4, 120–2, 133, 159–62
Princeton University Library, 88, 103
Private Academic Library
Network of Indiana, 158–61
Project COUNTER, 82
Prokrym, Tatiana, 96–9
proxy service See authentication
online access issues, 23, 27–8, 33–4
publishers
consortial environment, 141, 148, 153–4, 158, 164
e-journals, 40–1, 43, 164, 177
negotiation with, 41, 43, 65
patron-driven acquisitions and automated collection development, 6, 94
represented in library systems, 74, 77, 83, 94
role in discovery, 119, 121
Purdue University, 88, 103

Q

Questia, 175–6

R

R2 Consulting, 55
reference, 7–8, 14, 24, 27, 44–8, 52, 63, 178
Resource Description and Access (RDA), 156
resource management See also web-scale library systems
academic libraries, 89–92
cloud computing, 86–9
consortial environment, 143
discovery, 189
paradigm shift, 11, 84–6
systems, 95–6, 101–4, 115
workflow and responsibilities, 92–5, 187
resource sharing among libraries See interlibrary loan
Rocket eBook, 173

S

SaaS (software as a service), 25, 87, 91
Safari, 179
ScholarlyStats, 102
Scholars Portal, OCUL, 150
search engines, commercial, 54, 109–12, 115, 127
serials
functions, 14–15, 35, 40–6, 51, 56, 59–65, 93, 102–3
print, 16, 29, 33–4, 43, 51–2, 55–6, 76, 100, 103, 161
subscription agents, 40, 83, 120
units/departments, 3, 8, 15–16, 26, 29–30, 33, 40–4, 50–2, 171, 184
SERIALST, 42
SERU (Shared Electronic Resources Understanding), 82–3
SFX, 53, 98, 102, 159–61, 163
sharing expertise, 20–1, 131–2, 143, 149, 152–3, 155, 161
Sierra, 88–9
Simon Fraser University, 76, 99
SirsiDynix SingleSearch, 135
SirsiDynix Symphony, 136
SoftBook, 173
Solr, 162
Sony Electronics, 174
Sony Reader PRS-505/Touch Edition PRE-600, 174
special collections, 21, 31–2
Springer, 177
Stachokas, George, 29–32
Stachowicz, Christine, 59–63
standards
electronic resource workflow, 59
library systems, 17, 72, 82–4, 86, 91–2
metadata, 2–3
Statewide California Electronic Library Consortium, 151
Statsbiblioteket, 99–101
streaming media, 24, 26, 31, 90, 127, 153, 158
subscription agents, 40, 65, 73, 83, 177
Summon, 61, 65, 101, 120, 122, 124, 133–4, 163
SUSHI (Standardized Usage Statistics Harvesting Initiative), 83
Swarthmore College, 150 Swets 65, 102 Syndetics 125

T

Taylor & Francis, 33, 177
technical services, 22, 45, 51, 93–5
blurring with access services, 8, 15, 94, 187
blurring with library systems, 7, 25, 33, 41, 129, 131, 185
acquisitions, 3, 22
cataloging, 12, 22
electronic resources management, 17–18, 29–30, 44, 187
blurring with public services, 6–8, 14–15, 19, 24, 41, 43–50, 54, 127–9, 131, 185–7
changing nature of, 1, 53, 57–9, 81, 84, 127–9, 131
consortial consolidation of, 146
electronic resource management, 55, 73, 77
Texas A&M University, 15, 174
Toowoomba Library, 173
TotalCare, Ex Libris, 159–60
Tri-College Library Consortium, 150
trials of electronic resources, 3, 40, 48, 50, 70, 99, 136, 146
Triangle Research Libraries Network, 60, 155

U

unified index See central index
University of Akron, 152
University of California Libraries system, 20
University of California, San Diego, 79
University of Colorado, 79
University of Denver, 178
University of Florida, 162
University of Hong Kong, 13
University of Indianapolis, 158–61
University of Michigan, 124
University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 12
University of Nevada, Reno, 50, 118
University of New South Wales, 15
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 59–63
University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 32–5
University of Northern Colorado, 26
University of Notre Dame, 80, 96–9
University of Otago, 131–4
University of Rochester, 116
University of Texas at Dallas, 179
University of Virginia, 116
University of Waikato, 131
University of Washington, 75
University of Western Australia, 75
University of Windsor, 79
usability and usability testing, 12, 21, 23, 110, 123, 134, 185
usage statistics and analysis for collection development, 17–18, 24, 94, 179
for discovery layer selection, 133
responsibilities, 20, 24, 27, 30, 35, 48, 76
services and systems, 19, 62, 64, 70–1, 74, 83, 92, 102, 188
standards, 82–3, 92
within consortia, 145–8, 151, 163–4
user experience, 1, 6–7, 54, 93, 114, 122–3, 129

V

V-sources ERM, 99
vendors
data about vendors in systems, 70, 74, 77, 102
e-books, 61, 90, 164, 171, 174–7, 182–3, 185, 189
e-journals, 163
e-readers, 175
library systems, 83, 98, 185
discovery service, 119–22, 132–3, 136, 155, 159–60
resource management, 87–8, 90–4
negotiation, 43, 50, 61, 98, 135, 150, 159–60
platform branding, 76
providing records and data, 18, 60, 84, 90–4, 103
relationship with libraries, 31, 34, 83, 128, 171, 182
relationship with publishers, 90–1, 121, 171, 182
resource activation, 3, 13
selection, 27
VERA, 72
Verde, 64, 73, 78–9, 88, 97, 99–100, 151
Verify, 150
Victoria University, 131
Villanova University, 116, 125
Virginia Tech University, 125
Virtual Library of Virginia (VIVA), 147–8
Voyager, 132–3
VTLS, 150–1
VuFind, 116, 125

W

Washington State University, 75
Wayne State University, 53
web development, 12, 30, 45–6, 48, 53, 55, 58, 101
web-scale library systems
discovery, 112–13, 118–22, 125, 130
resource management, 20, 27–8, 65, 88–9, 92, 101, 156
WebBridge, 76
website, library, 18, 23, 31, 51, 58, 83, 123–5, 188
Wikipedia, 125
WISDOM, 151
WorldCat, 83, 88, 119, 128, 135
WorldCat Local, 119, 121, 128, 135–6, 189

X

Xerxes, 160

Y

Yankee Book Peddler, 33, 102

Z

Zotero, 126
..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset