Illustrations
Figures
Figure 0.1 This Is My Dad Going to Work, p. xv, Danielle LeFevre.
Figure 0.2 Design versus Construction Process, p. xviii, Chuck Thomsen.
Figure 12.1 McKinsey 7-S +1 diagram, p. 167
Figure 16.1 Using target value limits, p. 218
Figure 16.2 Project Design Controls framework with “Level 0: Contracts and Team Assembly,” p. 219
Figure 17.1 Project Design Controls Framework “Level 0: Subsurface,” p. 224
Figure 17.2 Project Delivery Timelines and Project Control Timing, p. 226
Figure 18.1 Project Design Controls Framework “Level 1: Foundation,” p. 229
Figure 18.2 Project Analysis, p. 233
Figure 19.1 Project Design Controls Framework “Level 2: Structure,” p. 242
Figure 19.2 Collect | Analyze | Synthesize, p. 256
Figure 19.3 Individual | Group, p. 257
Figure 19.4 Diverge | Converge, p. 257
Figure 20.1 Project Design Controls Framework “Level 3: Systems,” p. 264
Figure 21.1 Project Design Controls Framework “Level 4: Enclosure,” p. 271
Figure 22.1 Project Design Controls Framework with “Context,” p. 274
Figure 23.1 “The Science of Muddling Through,” p. 283, after T. Sargent and C. Lindblom.
Figure CS1.2 Georgia Tech MARC: Brick Detail, p. 302
Figure CS1.3 Georgia Tech MARC: Physical Model, p. 302
Figure CS1.4 Georgia Tech MARC: Atrium, p. 303, Jonathan Hillyer
Figure CS1.5 Georgia Tech MARC Drawing: “Things That Move,” p. 304
Figure CS1.6 Georgia Tech MARC Entry Detail, p. 305
Figure CS1.7 Georgia Tech MARC Entry Bridge, p. 305
Figure CS1.8 Georgia Tech MARC Entry Bridge, p. 306, Photo Jonathan Hillyer
Figure CS1.11 Georgia Tech MARC Gear Ceiling, p. 307, Photo Jonathan Hillyer
Figure CS1.12 Georgia Tech MARC PA Citation, p. 308
Figure CS2.1 Zoo ARC, Lord, Aeck & Sargent, Architects, p. 309, Photo: Jonathan Hillyer
Figure CS3.1 Flint RiverQuarium, Albany, GA, Antoine Predock Architects, p. 311, photo Tim Hursley
Figure CS3.2 Flint RiverQuarium, Albany, GA, Antoine Predock Architects, p. 313
Figure CS4.1 ASU Hayden Library, Image p. 313, courtesy Eric Zobrist, Ayers Saint Gross
Figure CS5.1 Emory CLC, rendering image p. 316, courtesy Duda|Paine Architects, topside front
Tables
Table 1 Design Conditions and Contexts, p. xliii
Table 2 Team (OAC Relationship), p. xliv
Table 3 Design Drivers and Influences, p. xliv
Table 4 Design Disciplines and Consultants, p. xlv
Table 17.1 Relative Facility Life Cycle Cost, p. 225, R. Tietjen
Table 17.2 Project Delivery Methods – Design Management Advantages, p. 225
Table 18.1 Responsibility Matrix, p. 231
Table 19.1 Building Program Requirements Evolution, p. 243
Table 19.2 Design Schedule Evolution, p. 250
Table 19.3 Normalized Data, p. 259
Table 19.4 Documents Planning, p. 260
Table 19.5 Documents Management & Production, p. 260
Table 19.6 Documents Review, p. 261
Unless noted otherwise, all photos, illustrations, and tables are copyright of the author.