Power system equipments are required to work under unpredictable conditions, such as with a live conductor touching the ground (the short circuit problem) or a lightning striking the conductors (the over voltage problem). Under faulty conditions of the system healthy phase voltages may rise beyond the rated value, the faulty phase current may increase abnormally or both these anomalies may occur concurrently. These are undesirable effects that may lead to damage of costly equipment due to the break down of insulation. A short circuit occurs when two points at different potentials are connected either with zero resistance (a dead short circuit) or with a substance of low resistance (a simple short circuit). A short circuit current is several times higher than the rated current of the equipment. In a short circuit, heavy current flows through all parts of the system into the defective area or fault. This problem is of particular significance in the present-day inter-connected power systems. A fault may be designated either as a series or a shunt fault. While a series fault is due to the breakage of conductors, a shunt fault arises due to short circuit. Shunt faults are more serious than series faults, and many times series faults are converted to shunt faults. The excess MVA at the location of a fault is referred to as the fault level at that point.
Calculation of short circuit currents gains importance in the design of protective switch gear like isolators, circuit breakers, short circuit current limiting reactors and the design of settings for protective relays.
Faults are divided into two types:
Balanced faults occur infrequently, but they are serious due to heavy fault levels. During these faulty conditions, symmetry (or balanced condition) may be observed in all the three-phases. The only fault that comes under this category is the three-phase fault. Knowledge of the three-phase fault MVA is essential to estimate the breaking capacity of the circuit breaker, as these fault levels are the highest. Fault levels are maximum when all the three-phases are involved in a fault. Due to symmetry, knowledge of the condition of one phase in a three-phase system is sufficient to estimate the condition of other phases. This simplifies short circuit calculations to a great extent as calculations are made on a single-phase, rather than on a 3-phase basis.
Unbalanced faults occur frequently, and involve one or two phases only. Symmetry condition in the system is lost due to these faults, making fault calculations more difficult than in the case of three-phase faults. Unsymmetrical fault analysis is discussed in the Chapter 7.
A power system is made up of three components, namely, generators, transformers and transmission lines. Consider a simple power system network comprising these three components and shown as a single line diagram as in Figure 6.1.
Fig 6.1 Single Line Diagram Representation of a Simple 3-Bus Power System Network
The single-line diagram of a power system represents a three-phase power system which works perfectly under balanced condition. A three-phase system consists of four lines, namely, R-phase, Y-phase, B-phase and Neutral. Let us understand how these four lines can be represented to a single line.
No consideration of Neutral Line:
Under balanced conditions,
Neutral line current In = IR + IY + IB = 0 and
Neutral line voltage Vn = In Zn = 0 where Zn is the neutral line impedance.
Neutral line power Sn = Vn In = 0. The power carried by the neutral line is zero, as both voltage and current are zeros. For this reason, the neutral of a balanced three-phase system is referred to as a Zero Power Bus (ZPB). The neutral line is insignificant as there is no current, voltage or power. This reduces system from four lines to three lines.
Consideration of only one phase
In addition, as the system is working under balanced conditions, the knowledge of current, voltage or power in one phase is enough to estimate these quantities for the other phases. In other words, calculations on a single-phase basis are enough to claim for three-phase analysis. This reduces the three lines to a single line (or single-phase).
Manufacturers design circuit breakers with standard ratings such as 500, 750 and 1000 MVA. Accurate fault MVA calculation is not required as the circuit breaker is not designed to calculated value. Instead, a nearest high MVA-rated circuit breaker is to be chosen for placement at the fault location. Further, since the reactance of individual equipment is much higher than the resistance, the resistance can be neglected. In view of the above discussion, the following assumptions are made for the simplification of symmetrical fault analysis.
Now, the power system represented as a single line diagram is converted to an equivalent reactance diagram as shown in Figure 6.2.
Fig 6.2 Reactance Diagram of the Power System Shown in Figure 6.1
In the figure, the generator is represented by a constant voltage source behind the reactance; the transformer is shown as a series reactance element (provided per unit reactance is used); and the transmission line is represented by a series reactance element. The ‘per unit method', which uses per unit values of electrical quantities simplifies power system calculations. It is customary to use this method for performing fault calculations and knowledge of arriving at per unit values is essential.
A per unit value has no unit. A quantity expressed in a certain unit becomes unit less when it is divided by another quantity expressed in the same unit. Hence, per unit value is defined as:
The base or reference value is chosen by us according to our convenience.
Let the actual current be 100 amps. Determine p. u. current if the
Solution:
Let the actual rating of the equipment be 100MVA. Determine p. u. MVA for the chosen base MVA: a) 200 MVA and b) 100 MVA.
Solution:
It is important to select appropriate base values for converting the actual rating of electrical equipment to per unit values. Once the base values are chosen, converting actual values to per unit values becomes a simple task. In this context, we may ask the question: Is it required to select base values for all electrical quantities?
The answer is Yes as well as No.
The answer is Yes if we come across different electrical quantities in a problem. To convert it into per unit value, base value is needed. Hence we need to select base values for all electrical quantities.
The answer is No in fault calculations, where this method is normally used. We come across only four electrical quantities in these calculations:
Hence, it is sufficient to choose base values for these quantities, as other quantities are absent in the calculations. However, base values are not selected for all the four quantities. These values are set for power and voltage, and those for current and impedance are derived from them. All the four quantities are treated as a set of base values.
Let Base power = MVAb or KVAb and Base voltage = KVb.
Now, Base current Ib in amperes is:
The Base impedance Zb in Ohms is:
Note:
A 10MVA, 10 KV equipment has an impedance of 1Ohm. Find its
a) p. u impedance
b) % impedance
Solution:
Take the rating of the equipment as its base value:
Therefore,
For the equipment in Example 6.3, the base values are chosen as 20MVA, 5KV. Find the new % impedance.
Solution:
Old base values = 10MVA, 10KV
New base values = 20MVA, 5KV
Using Equation (6.3)
The following are the advantages of the per unit method.
To make equivalent impedance of the transformer same on either side, individual sets of base values must be chosen for the HV and LV regions based on the following directions:
The following numerical example illustrates the selection of base values in the networks containing transformers.
Choosing the transformer ratings as base values, prove that the equivalent impedance of a transformer in p. u referred to the LV and HV sides is the same.
Solution:
Base power on the LV side = Base power in HV side = MVA rating of transformer = MVAb
Base voltage on the LV side = KV rating on LV side = KVb,LV
Base voltage on the HV side = KV rating on the HV side = KVb,HV
As the rated voltages of the transformer are taken as base voltages, their ratio is exactly equal to the transformation ratio of the transformer. Now the base impedances on the LV and HV sides are:
Let the equivalent impedance of the transformer referred to the LV side be Zeq,LV Ohms.
The p. u value is
We know,
In the above step, the numerator Zeq,HV = N2 × Zeq,LV
and the denominator is Zb,HV.
Hence, the condition is proved.
A single-phase 8 MVA, 33/11 KV transformer has equivalent impedance referred to the LV side as: (1 + j9) Ohms. Choosing transformer rating as the base values, obtain per unit equivalent impedance referred to the LV and HV sides.
Solution:
Transformer ratio = 33/11 = 3
By choosing the three-phase power and line voltage as base values for a three-phase system, demonstrate how the per unit method performs power system calculations on the single-phase basis.
Solution:
For a single-phase system the base impedance is
For a 3-phase system, three-phase power and line-to-line voltage are chosen as base values. Hence the base impedance is:
As the system is assumed to be star connected,
The above derivation proves that base impedance calculated for a 3-phase system is equivalent to base impedance calculated for a single phase. Hence, per unit method performs power system calculations on a single-phase basis.
Consider the power system shown in Figure 6.3(a). Choosing appropriate base values convert the diagram into per unit reactance diagram. Use the data given in the table.
Fig 6.3(a) Single-Line Diagram of a Power System Network
Per unit reactances:
Using the LV side base values of T1,
the per unit reactance value is :
XT2 = j0.1 p.u on 132KV or 11KV and 50MVA
XT2 on the selected base values 132 KV or 11KV and 100MVA is:
The per unit reactance diagram is shown in Figure 6.3(a)
Computation of three-phase fault currents is quite an easy process as calculations are carried out on a single-phase basis. The computation needs knowledge of:
Fig 6.3(b) p. u. Reactance Diagram
Let a three-phase fault occur at the ith bus in a power system. Reduce the per unit reactance diagram into Thevenin's equivalent circuit across the faulted ith bus and the neutral (ZPB) as shown in Figure 6.4. In the figure, XTh is the Thevenin's equivalent reactance expressed in per unit value.
Let ISC be the short circuit current. The value of ISC is limited by XTh.
Define the base values as:
Base voltage V = Rated voltage E
Base current I = Full load or rated current
Base Impedance
Thevenin's equivalent reactance in per unit is given by
Rewriting the above,
By substituting V = E in the Equation (6.4) and using the above equation, it can be written as:
Fig 6.4 Thevenin's Equivalent Circuit
Note:
The ratio of rated current I to short-circuit ISC, gives the per unit reactance of the equipment.
% reactance is given by:
Rewriting the Equation (6.6) as
Multiplying both sides of Equation (6.7) with rated (or base) voltage
Equation (6.8) can be written as
The above equation is a useful formula to determine short-circuit KVA.
Procedure for the calculation of symmetrical fault involves the following steps:
A 3-phase 10MVA, 11KV alternator has 10% sub-transient reactance. Find short circuit MVA and current, if a symmetrical fault occurs at its terminals.
Solution:
Take the alternator ratings as base values.
Base MVA 5 10MVA
Base KV 5 11KV
Two 11KV, 3-phase, 5MVA generators having sub-transient reactance of 3% and 2% respectively operate in parallel. Suppose the power loaded through a 11/220 KV, 10MVA transformer has % equivalent reactance of 4%. Calculate fault current and fault MVA for there-phase occurring on the H.T side of the transformer as shown in Figure 6.5(a). Also calculate the fault MVA supplied by each generator.
Solution:
Let common base MVA = 10
Base voltage for LT side of the transformer = 11KV
Base voltage for HT side of the transformer = 220KV
The % reactance of generators on selected base values are:
The reactance diagram is shown in Figure 6.5(b)
Thevenin's equivalent % reactance is
Fig 6.5(a) Power System Network of Example 6.10
Fig 6.5(b) p. u. Equivalent Reactance Diagram
Using the current division formula,
Two generators rated 11KV, 5000KVA having 5% reactance are interconnected by a transmission line of length 50 kms. The reactance of the line is 0.4 ohms/phase/km. Generators are connected to the line through a step-up transformer rated 11KV/33KV, 8000KVA and having 4% reactance. A three-phase fault occurs at the middle of transmission line. Calculate the fault MVA and current. Neglect load current.
Solution:
Selection of Base values
Common Base MVA = 8 MVA = 8000 KVA
Base KV (LT side) = 11 KV
Base KV (HT side) = 33 KV
Base impedance (HT side)
Total reactance of the line = 50 kms × 0.4 Ohms/phase/km = 20 Ohms
p. u. reactance of the line
p. u. reactance of the line up to the fault location
The reactance diagram is shown in Figure 6.6(b)
Thevenin's equivalent % reactance across the fault terminals is
Fig 6.6(a) Power System Network of Example 6.11
Fig 6.6(b) p. u. Equivalent Reactance Diagram
Short-circuit MVA at the fault location
Short-circuit current at the fault location
The extent of short-circuits at different locations can be reduced by connecting current-limiting reactors also known series reactors. A series reactor is an inductive coil having a large inductance with negligible resistance. These reactors are designed without saturation problems. By designing the reactance of the series reactor to a suitable value, short-circuit currents can be reduced to such a level where circuit breakers can handle them quite easily. As the present day power system is largely interconnected, a fault at a particular location is contributed to by the large number of generators. These unacceptable short-circuit levels can be easily adjusted to an acceptable value by using series reactors.
Types of series reactors:
Depending upon the location at which the series reactor placed, these can be divided into:
Generator reactors are connected between the generator and the generator bus. The present-day generators are designed to have high reactance. Therefore, under dead three-phase fault condition of generator, the fault current is limited by its own reactance and hence generator reactors become unnecessary. However, older generators may require them. It is not a common practice to use separate reactors for each generator due to the following disadvantages.
Fig 6.7 Generator Reactors
Disadvantages
In this case, each feeder is equipped with a series reactor as shown in Figure 6.8
Advantages
Disadvantages
Fig 6.8 Feeder Reactors
These reactors are connected to the bus bars as shown in Figure 6.9. Use of bus bar reactors avoids continuous voltage drop and power loss. This is because power flow through the reactor is small. It can be seen from the figure that if fault occurs on any one feeder, the generator connected to the feeder feeds the fault directly, whereas other generators feed the fault through bus bar reactors.
Types of Bus Bar reactors
Bus bar reactors can be connected in two ways to avoid power loss and voltage drop across the system under normal conditions.
Fig 6.9 Bus Bar Reactors
Fig 6.10 Sectionalized Bus Bar
Advantages
Fig 6.1 Sectionalizing of Bus Bars
The only disadvantage of this method is the requirement of an additional bus bar.
Figure 6.12 shows the single-line diagram of a power system. The % reactance of the generators is calculated by taking their ratings as base values. Calculate the short-circuit KVA if a 3Φ fault occurs on the feeder at the beginning. If the short circuit KVA has to reduce to 50% of that obtained earlier, then find the % reactance of feeder reactor.
Solution:
Common base MVA = 20.
The reactance diagram is shown below:
Fig 6.12 Power System Network of Example 6.12
Thevenin's equivalent resistance
Short circuit MVA = 50% of earlier value = 45 MVA
Base impedance Example 6.16
Xsc 5 0.2222 p.u × 6.05 = 1.344 Ohms
A 3-phase 100 MVA, 10KV alternator has 5% reactance. Find the external reactance per phase to be connected in series with the alternator so that three-phase short-circuit does not exceed eight times the full load current.
Solution:
Full load current of alternator
Therefore %Xse = % reactance of series reactor = 7.5%
The formula for % reactance is:
Where I = full load current
V = rated voltage per phase
From the above, the value of series reactor in Ohms is
A power plant has four generators. Two generators rated 15 MVA have a reactance of 15%, and the other two rated 20MVA have 20% reactance. These generators are connected to station bus bars. Power is drawn to the load centers through two power transformers rated 50MVA each and having % reactance of 10%. It is required to design circuit breakers with ratings that are to be provided at the LT and HT side of transformer. The system is shown in Figure 6.13.
Solution:
Let 50 MVA be taken as the common base MVA. The % reactance of the generators is recalculated for the new base MVA taken
Design of circuit break rating on LT side of transformer
To design CB rating on the LT side, a three-phase fault is shown on the LT side as shown in the figure. Other feeder and transformer reactances do not appear in the fault current path. Obviously, the Thevenin's equivalent reactance is given by
Therefore CB rating on LT side = short circuit MVA =
Fig 6.13 Power System Network for Example 6.14
Design of CB rating on the HT side:
To design CB rating on the HT side, the fault has to be considered on the HT side as shown in the figure. Now, % reactance of the transformer comes in the way of fault current
CB rating on the HT side = Short circuit MVA = 50 MVA × (100/22.5) = 222.22 MVA
A generating station has four generators, each rated 11 KV, 100 MVA and each having a sub transient reactance of 10%. A sectionalized bus reactor is placed as shown in Figure 6.14. A three-phase fault occurred at a point near the bus as shown in the figure.
Fig 6.14 Power System Network for Example 6.15
Solution:
Common base MVA = 100
Base kV = 11kV
Base impedance = = 1.21 Ohms
(a) The equivalent circuit to determine Thevenin's equivalent reactance is shown below.
The % X = 0 Ohms taking
(b) The generator G1 and G2 will supply MVA directly to the fault, the value of which is 50% of total fault, i.e., 2000MVA. Now, G3 and G4 have to supply 3000 – 2000 = 1000MVA fault power. Consider the following equivalent reactance diagram
Short circuit MVA = 1000 = 100 ×
Xtotal =
But %Xtotal = ((10% || 10%) + % X
From the above, % X = 5%
Therefore
Particulars of three generators namely A, B and C are as follows.
GA: 11 KV, 40 MVA, X = 10%
GB : 11 KV, 60 MVA, X = 12%
GC : 11 KV, 25 MVA, X = 10%
Three generators are inter-connected as shown in Figure 6.15(a). The generators are provided with bus bar reactors, each having Xse = 10% reactance based on their ratings. A feeder directly connected to Generator A as shown in the figure has an impedance of Z = 0.05 + j 0.1 Ohms/phase. Estimate the short-circuit MVA if a symmetrical fault occurs at the far end of the feeder.
Fig 6.15(a) Power System Network of Example 6.16
Solution:
Let 60 MVA, 11 KV be common base values. The p. u. reactances based on common base values are computed below:
Generator A: XA = 10% = 0.1 p.u on 11 KV, 40 MVA
Generator B: XB = 0.12 p. u on 11 KV, 60 MVA
Generator C:
Series bus bar reactor
Feeder impedance Zbase= 0.05 + j0.1 Ohms /phase
Base impedance
Feeder impedance in p. u
assuming that pre-fault current is zero (No Load).
The equivalent circuit is shown in Figure 6.15(b). The figure can be used to find Thevenin's equivalent reactance.
Fig 6.15(b) p. u. Equivalent Reactance Diagram
Finally, Thevenin's impedance:
Short-circuit MVA
Two power stations, namely, A and B have short-circuit capacities of 800 and 600 MVA respectively. Both are operating at 11 KV. Find the short-circuit MVA if they are interconnected by a cable of 0.4 Ohm reactance per phase.
Solution:
Using Equation (6.9) p. u reactance of the two stations can be obtained as below:
Let Base MVA = 100;
Base KV = 11;
p. u. reactance of
p. u. reactance of B =
Base impedance =
Cable reactance in p. u =
The equivalent circuit is shown in Figure 6.16.
Fig 6.16 Power System Network of Example 6.17
It can be verified from Figure 6.16 that short circuit MVA is maximum when the fault occurs at point B.
Taking terminal-A and grand as terminals,
XTh = (0.166 || (0.125 + 0.3305)
= 0.122 p.u
Short-circuit MVA
Short-circuit currents are several times more than pre-fault load currents and hence neglected. If load currents are large they may be required to be considered in short-circuit analysis. In addition, if a large number of synchronous motors are working in the system, under faulty conditions they feed power to the fault momentarily before the circuit breaker operates, working as synchronous generators with available kinetic energy in the rotor. As there is a separate field system available, the case is not applicable to induction motors. The exact fault current in this case can be obtained by superimposing load current on fault current through the use of super position theorem.
Fig 6.17 Consideration of Pre-Fault Load Current
It can be seen in Figure 6.17 that under faulty conditions,
where Ifg = Component of fault current supplied by the generator
Ifm = Component of fault current supplied by the synchronous motor
ILoad = Pre-fault load current supplied from generator to motor
A synchronous generator is supplying 60MVA power to a synchronous motor through a transmission line. Numerical data of the equipment depicted in Figure 6.18(a) are per unit values computed on common base values of 100MVA, 11KV.
Fig 6.18(a) Power System Network of Example 6.18
Motor is drawing 50MW at 0.8 P. f (lead). Terminal voltage of the motor is 10.9 KV. Now, a 3-phase fault occurs in Bus-1 as shown in the figure. Considering the pre-fault load current, compute the total generator and motor currents under faulty conditions.
Solution:
The equivalent circuit is shown in Figure 6.18(b)
Base MVA = 100; Base KV = 11;
Base current =
Terminal voltage of the motor = 10.9KV
Power drawn by the motor = 50 MW
Load current
Load current in p. u
Let the receiving end voltage (motor terminal) be taken as reference
Fig 6.18(b) p. u. Equivalent Reactance Diagram
Motor terminal voltage in p. u
Generator terminal voltage
Thevenin's equivalent voltage = Pre-fault voltage across generator terminals = 0.97488 + j0.02016 p.u
Thevenin's equivalent reactance across fault terminals 1 and ground G terminals from Fig 6.18(c) is:
Fig 6.18(c) Thevenin's Equivalent Circuit
Total fault current =
Using current division formula, fault current supplied by the generator is
Total fault current supplied by the generator and motor is:
(b) Two generators are connected to a common bus bar at which an outgoing feeder is connected. The generator ratings are 15MVA, 30% and 20MVA, 50% respectively. The percentage reactance of each alternator is based on its own capacity. The bus bar voltage is 12KV. Find the short-circuit current that will flow into a complete 3-φ short-circuit at the beginning of the outgoing feeder.
(b) The section bus bar A and B are linked by a bus bar reactor rated at 5000KVA with 10% reactance. On bus bar A there are two generators, each of 10,000KVA with 10% reactance and on bus bar B there are two generators, each of 8000KVA with 12% reactance. Find the steady MVA fed into a dead short-circuit between all phases on A and B with bus bar reactor in the circuit.
(b) A transmission line of inductance 0.1 H and resistance 5 Ω is connected to a source of V = 100 sin (ωt + 150), f = 50 Hz at one end and the other end is suddenly short circuited at t = 0 at the bus bar end. Write the expression for the short circuit current i(t). Find approximately, the value of the first current maximum.
(b) Explain how base quantities can be selected, and derive the formula for base impedance.
Fig Q1
Fig Q2
are connected to each bus bar section. Calculate the MVA fed to a fault under short-circuit condition on two of the bus bars.
Fig Q3
Which of the following are correct?
List — 1 | List — 2 |
(Type of element) | (Application) |
1. Series Reactor | A. Power Factor |
2. Shunt Reactor | B. Stability |
3. Series Capacitor | C. Ferranti Effect |
4. Shunt Capacitor | D. Faults |
[GATE 1991 Q.No. 1]
Feeder transformer reactance: 10% on 50 Mva base.
The generating source A, B, C have individual fault levels at 1000 MVA with respective generator breakers open. Ignore pre-fault currents and assume 1.0 p.u. voltages throughout before fault. Assume common base of 1000 MVA.
[GATE 1996 Q.No. 10]
[GATE 1997 Q.No. 9]
[GATE 1997 Q.No. 10]
[GATE 1998 Q.No. 2]
[GATE 1999 Q.No. 12]
Transformer: 3-phase, 33/11 kV, 6 MVA,0.01+ j0.08 p.u. impedance.
Load: 3-phase, 11 kv, 5800 MVA, 0.8 lag, j0.2 p.u. impedance.
Impedance of each feeder 9 + j18Ω
[GATE 1999 Q.No. 15]
[GATE 2000 Q.No. 2]
[GATE 2000 Q.No. 13]
[GATE 2001 Q.No. 3]
[GATE 2001 Q.No. 4]
[GATE 2004 Q.No. 11]
inertia M = 20 p.u.; reactance x = 2 p.u.
The p.u. values of inertia and reactance on 100 MVA common base, respectively, are
[GATE 2005 Q.No. 1]
[JTO 2009 Section II, Q.No. 38]