As for the other cross-sections we will now derive the flow rate for the rectangular cross-section according to Eq. 10.9. Obviously, any solution to the Navier-Stokes equation we found in Eq. 16.53, Eq. 16.58, and Eq. 16.62 could be used for deriving the flow rate. In the following, we will limit ourselves to Eq. 16.53 since this is the most commonly found equation, which gives rise to some convenient simplifications. Using Eq. 10.9 and Eq. 16.53 we find the flow rate as
We can further simplify this expression using the fact that Eq. 16.63 contains a series with a known convergence value given by
See Tab. 4.1 for details on this series. We can therefore rewrite Eq. 16.63 to
Eq. 16.64 gives the general case of the flow rate in a rectangular channel.
Channels With Square Cross-Sections. If setting h = w in Eq. 16.64, we obtain
Approximation for Channels With Low Aspect Ratios. As you can see from Fig. 3.4b the hyperbolic tangent tanh x converges to 1 for values of x > 1. Therefore, for channels with aspect ratios r 1 we will find
in which case we can simplify Eq. 16.64 to
where we can apply a second known series convergence value given by
Again, see Tab. 4.1 for details on this series. Using this series we can rewrite Eq. 16.66 to
For we obtain the flow rate calculated for the infinitesimally elongated channel, Eq. 16.14. Obviously, we make mistakes if applying Eq. 16.67 for channels with aspect ratios in the range of 1 and above. Fig. 16.15 shows the relative error we obtain when using Eq. 16.67 instead of Eq. 16.64 for calculating the flow rate. As you can see, the error is in the range of 13 % for r = 1, whereas it drops below 1 % at r < 0.65. For smaller aspect ratios, the error is negligible. For aspect ratios bigger than 1 the simplification should not be used since the error introduced is significant.
In this section we have studied analytical solutions to Poiseuille flow problems, i.e., flows that are pressure-driven. We have derived solutions to several commonly encountered flow channel geometries in microfluidics, including the elliptical and circular as well as the rectangular channel profile. For these profiles we have derived the velocity profile as well as the flow rate equation. As we have seen, even a simple cross-section such as a rectangular channel required the application of concepts for solving PDEs that we have derived in section 8.2 and section 8.3. In most cases, we were able to work with very simple Dirichlet-type boundary conditions because the flow velocity on the solid wall of a microfluidic channel is 0. Until now, we have not yet solved more complex flow conditions where one of these boundary conditions may not be zero as in the case of, e.g., the Couette flow. If we want to solve flow profiles in channels with changing cross-section or more complex geometries, we will very quickly run out of analytical techniques for assessing such complex flow cases. This is the regime of numerical solutions to the Navier-Stokes equation, which we will explore in section 28.