28

ETHICAL SALESMANSHIP

Ethics Audit

Approximately 25 minutes

Overview

This exercise affords participants an opportunity to assess their sales culture via an ethics audit. The audit follows a brief discussion of the extent to which those at the top of a sales organization or department influence the sales culture.

Purpose

To generate discussion regarding elements of the organizational culture that may need strengthening.

Group Size

Any number of individuals can participate.

Room Arrangement

No special arrangements are required.

Materials

Handout 28.1, “Sales Culture Audit”

Procedure

1.Point out that the recent spate of corporate scandals has roots that extend deep into the soil of immorality and illegality. Supply a few examples, such as the admission by WorldCom that it was guilty of accounting fraud—one of the largest frauds in the history of American business. They inflated profits by $3.8 billion during a 13-month period ending in March 2002. Their former CEO, Bernard Ebbers, also “borrowed” hundreds of millions of dollars from the firm.

2.Lead a brief discussion concerning the extent to which the tone of a particular culture is established by those at the top of the organization—those with sufficient clout to influence the buying and selling patterns of thousands of others.

3.Distribute Handout 28.1 and have participants work on it individually. Have small groups discuss their most extreme replies.

4.Bring closure by calling on a spokesperson from each group to share briefly the participants’ replies.

Variation

Ask for a volunteer to distribute the survey organization-wide (with some word-smithing to make it applicable to any employee), after obtaining the necessary approvals, and to analyze the results. (Professional courtesy dictates the analysis be shared with senior management before it is distributed throughout the organization.)

Have participants develop their own assessment tools. They will use sentence completion continuum extremes based an analysis of existing procedures, practices, and philosophies. For example, “The quality of our produce is shoddy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 best-in-class.”

Have them discuss where ethical lines are being crossed, thus creating potentially serious consequences for the individual (and his or her job), the team, the department, and even the organization. Have participants compare their assessments and—if several participants work in the same department—create a synthesized tool that can be taken back to the workplace and used to create and enforce ethical policies.

Discussion

What drives people to remain silent despite their knowledge of wrongdoing?

What is or should be your organization’s procedure for whistleblowers to follow?

What ethical tone is being set in your own organization by those in authority?

Quotation

“If we could read the secret history of our enemies, we should find in each man’s life, sorrow and suffering enough to disarm all hostility.”

—Henry Wadsworth Longfellow

Points of Interest

Speaking of the need to rid the whole culture of unethical practices and not just isolate a small number of people or practices, management consultant Frank J. Navran uses the metaphor of a “flea dip.” He likens the elimination of a particular ethical problem to a flea dip—which will remove fleas from your pet . . . until it returns to its everyday environment. There, in all likelihood, the animal will pick up fleas once again.

Navran maintains the establishment of an ethical environment depends on two things:

imagePutting the right people in the right place.

imageRewarding the people who are behind the change efforts.

HANDOUT 28.1

Sales Culture Audit

DIRECTIONS

Circle the number that comes closest to the description you feel best applies to your organization.

image

image

INTERPRETATION

If your score is less than 50, there’s a good possibility your organization is consumed by the profit factor. While this is not necessarily a bad thing, if the drive toward profit reaches greed levels, it can dominate the decisions being made and actions being taken. It’s also possible that your score reflects dissatisfaction with either the company you’ve chosen to work for or your chosen profession itself. To ascertain further if the dissatisfaction your score reflects is widely held, make a copy of the culture assessment and ask at least five colleagues to fill it out. Compare your answers with theirs.

If you scored from 50 to 70, your organization could probably be regarded as average in terms of the value it places on values themselves. There’s room for improvement here. Consider ways to effect that improvement.

A score of 71 to 89 reflects a company that probably won’t make the list of Top 100 Companies to Work for in America. Nonetheless, all the right ingredients are here for a culture of ethical success. Refinement is called for in some areas but, in all likelihood, there are no glaring gaps between what’s right and what’s being done.

Your firm, if you rated it 90 or above, might easily qualify for that Top 100 list. It would appear you are proud of your association with this organization and with the product or service it offers customers. As good as the organization is, though, a commitment to continuous improvement will keep it good and perhaps make it outstanding. Remember the Lexus ad: “The relentless pursuit of perfection.”

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset