99
Bibliography
T. Akenine-Möller, E. Haines, N. Hoffman, A. Pesce, M. Iwanicki, and S. Hillaire, Real-time
Rendering, 4th ed., AK Peters/CRC Press, 2018. 86
D. Baraff and A. Witkin, Large steps in cloth simulation, Proc. of the 25th Annual Con-
ference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 43–54, ACM, 1998. DOI:
10.1145/280814.280821. viii, 5, 19, 31, 41, 44, 57, 59, 73, 88, 92
D. Baraff, A. Witkin, and M. Kass, Untangling cloth, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG),
vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 862–870, 2003. DOI: 10.1145/882262.882357. 90
K. S. Bhat, C. D. Twigg, J. K. Hodgins, P. K. Khosla, Z. Popović, and S. M. Seitz, Estimating
cloth simulation parameters from video, Proc. of the ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Sympo-
sium on Computer Animation, pp. 37–51, 2003. 93
J. Bender, M. Müller, and M. Macklin, Position-based simulation methods in computer graphic,
EUROGRAPHICS Tutorials, Eurographics Association, 10.2312/egt.20171034, 2017. DOI:
10.1111/cgf.12346. 91
M. Bergou, S. Mathu, M. Wardetzky, and E. Grinspun, TRACKS: Toward directable
thin shells, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 26, no. 3, p. 50, 2007. DOI:
10.1145/1276377.1276439. 93
M. Botsch, L. Kobbelt, M. Pauly, P. Alliez, and B. Lévy, Polygon Mesh Processing, CRC Press,
2010. DOI: 10.1201/b10688. 12
S. Bouaziz, S. Martin, T. Liu, K. Ladislav, and M. Pauly, Projective dynamics: Fusing constraint
projections for fast simulation, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 33, no. 4, p. 154,
2014. DOI: 10.1145/2601097.2601116. 91
D. E. Breen, D. H. House, and Ph. H. Getto, A physically-based particle model of woven cloth,
e Visual Computer, vol. 8, no. 5–6, pp. 264–277, 1992. DOI: 10.1007/bf01897114. 5
D. E. Breen, D. H. House, and M. J. Wozny, Predicting the drape of woven cloth using in-
teracting particles, Proc. of the 21st Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive
Techniques, pp. 365–372, 1994. DOI: 10.1145/192161.192259. 57
R. Bridson, R. Fedkiw, and J. Anderson, Robust treatment of collisions, contact and friction
for cloth animation, ACM Transactions on Graphs, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 594–603, 2002. DOI:
10.1145/1198555.1198572. 89, 90, 93