Becoming a Person of Infl uence79
ence by making a calculation about whether logic or emotion is going to be
most effective.
Focus on two questions. First, how personal is the issue at hand to
your audience? If you’re broaching a topic that’s tied up in their identity
or their vested interests, you should be prepared for a strong emotional re-
sponse that even they might not understand. You’ll need to work through,
or at least disarm, this reaction to bring them around to your point of view,
so come ready to address their hearts. On the other hand, if they don’t have
much at stake in the decision or if they’re good at keeping their egos in
check, they’ll likely respond well to straight reasoning.
Second, where are you in the decision-making process? If you’re at an
active decision point and you’re trying to win votes, lean hard on logic. If
you’re trying to solicit interest early on or get buy-in after the fact, emo-
tions are a better target.
As you make your assessment, avoid sweeping generalizations about
gender or function. Don’t follow persistent biases; for example, that women
are more emotional than men, or that fi nance people only respond to cold,
hard facts.
For some more specifi c scenarios, see exhibit 5-1.
Once you know whether you’re targeting your audience’s hearts or
minds, you can tailor your argument accordingly.
EXHIBIT
Winning employees’ hearts or minds
Win hearts when . . . Win minds when . . .
• You’re introducing a new idea and trying to
pique interest.
• You want to raise the bar on performance or
commitment.
• You’re leading a team that is struggling with
discord or confl ict.
• You’re presenting something that’s disruptive
to the listener’s sense of self.
• You’re talking to people who are in a height-
ened emotional state.
• You need to gain support for a decision that’s
already been made.
• You’re talking to people who won’t feel person-
ally implicated by what you have to say.
• You’re presenting a correction to the facts
under lying a decision.
• You need to address a highly complex or techni-
cal set of problems.
• You want to help an overwhelmed team stop
overanalyzing and see a situation clearly.
• You’re trying to change direction on something
previously decided.