We've looked at thinking outside the box and abductive thinking. For a tool to really take your mind beyond boundaries, look no further than impossible thinking. You take your headscratcher and expand it so that it's impossible to solve. Then you ask the question: If you had to solve this problem—if it were necessary to solve or if you would die if you didn't solve it—what would you do?
A few things happen when you have an impossible conversation. First, it's a ridiculous conversation, so you acknowledge that everything said or suggested—the whole conversation—is stupid. As a result, quiet folks with great ideas start to speak up, because nothing discussed can be incorrect. Even more exciting, the ridiculous ideas normally shot down are now acceptable. Because the whole conversation is impossible, every idea is a good one, no matter how impossible. Even more amazing, because it's an impossible conversation, your brain can't make the determination that a thought isn't important, so it no longer discards ideas.
This simple exercise will demonstrate impossible thinking. Remember the nine dots exercise in “Outside-the-Box Thinking,” in which you had to connect the dots using four lines without lifting pen from paper? Now do it with one line. (Try it before reading the next sentence.) In our workshops, someone usually shouts within 5 to 10 seconds, “Use a thick marker!” Nobody makes that suggestion when it's possible to do so while thinking outside the box, but because this problem is impossible, someone makes the suggestion very quickly. Why is that? Impossible conversations have no constraints and no reality, so anything goes. You no longer throw away ideas because they're silly; instead, you vet those ideas.
Some of our clients are in the pharmaceutical industry. In our company's innovation workshops, I ask how long it takes from the moment a lab scientist says, “Gee, a cure for disease X” to when a drug hits the market. The response I usually get is 10, 12, or even 15 years. When I ask what it would take to accomplish that in an average of nine years, I get responses such as “A lot of red tape would have to be cut” or “Not going to happen.” Then I ask if the whole process could take six months, and I nearly get thrown out of the room. That goal is unilaterally considered completely and utterly impossible. Then I frame the following scenario: suppose there's a virus called Q1X5, and it's highly contagious—so contagious that merely walking by a carrier would cause you to contract this killer. If you are infected with Q1X5, there's a 50 percent chance you will die within a year. As a result, a high percentage of Earth's population would die in less than three years. Clearly, this is a bad situation. Now enter a lab scientist who looks closely at his experiment and says, “Gee, look at this, a vaccine for Q1X5.” I ask the class, “How long do you think it would take to get that drug into the marketplace?” The participants in the class shout answers—weeks, maybe a month or two. “What?” I inquire. “You thought nine years was tough, and you almost threw me out of the room when I asked for six months. What's changed here?” They respond that the necessity would make them able to eliminate lab testing and go straight to humans; they could go to the front of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) line and skip clinical trials, and the FDA would lift the requirements for studying side effects. Of course, many of the solutions raised in this workshop were ridiculous and impractical, but trying to solve the impossible surfaced a number of initiatives that could be accomplished. Although they won't solve the impossible, the initiatives would make a huge difference in getting the time down to 9 years from 10 or 12.
Here are a few places to consider using impossible thinking:
The Takeaway
Ask about solving the impossible to uncover ideas that contribute to solving the possible.
Exercises for Impossible Thinking