Mamta Nain, Nitin Goyal* and Manni Kumar
Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab, India
Abstract
The Internet of Underwater Things (IoUT) is the system of intelligent linked underwater things and a diverse kind of Internet of Things (IoT). IoUT is expected to permit different practicable requests, similar to ecological monitor, underwater examination, and calamity prohibition. With these uses, IoUT is considered as unique of the likely technology around developed intelligent towns. UWSN network system is favorable in the evolution of IoUT. In UWSN, many challenges exist that will be big challenge in evolution of IoUT. In this book chapter, basic concepts about the IoUT are presented like architecture, challenges, and application areas. UWSN and IoUT collectively help in many application areas like weather forecasting and monitoring. This chapter also presents introduction about new advance technology machine learning. How this helps in improving the application areas of underwater environment. Machine learning can also be used to explore minerals that exist below the water.
Keywords: Internet of Things (IoT), challenges, Internet of Underwater Things (IoUT), sensor, Underwater Wireless Sensor Network (UWSN), machine learning
Internet of Things (IoT) is novel standard that improves the traditional living style and convert it into advanced and technological life style [1]. This new emerging pattern simplifies our daily life by enabling the communication between sensors and electronic devices through the internet [2, 3]. IoUT is a new form of IoT, and this can be defined as underwater network of smart interrelated underwater objects. The concept of IoT was introduced in 1985 and IoUT was introduced in 2012 [4]. IoUT is a worldwide network of smart interrelated underwater objects that helps in exploring and monitoring the area below the water [5, 6].
Underwater Wireless Sensor Network (UWSN) has been provided as an efficient and promising network system for the Internet of Underwater Things (IoUT) [7]. There are several components which mainly exist in UWSN; one of its main components is sensors which are usually deployed under the water. These sensors can also be termed as nodes having acoustic modems distributed randomly in the shallow water. Different sensors are used for sensing different information about environment condition such as quality of water, water temperature, and pressure in the water and various phenomenon changes in the biological and chemical materials or elements [8]. Another essential component that is the part of UWSN is a sink node. The sink is responsible for receiving data from the sensor nodes present on the water surface [9]. Surface sink nodes have both radio and acoustic modems properties to deal with satellite connection and underwater nodes, respectively. These sinks might be any type of ship, Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) or surface buoy. After successful reception of data by the sink, it forwards the data to the control monitoring center or any onshore base station with the help of radio channels. This monitoring center is responsible for controlling all the activities that can be performed in the shallow water and also control the working of the underground sensors. All the information gathered from the water areas is analyzed and collected by the monitoring center. Apart from this, AUVs are deployed in the water which majorly performs collecting and forwarding related tasks in the deep water [10].
The state-of-the-art IoUT lend a hand the researchers to explore water reservoirs such as large oceans, rivers, and lakes through numerous communication approaches which correlate stationary and mobile nodes below the water, on the water surface, and in the sky, as shown in Figure 12.1. Using embedded sensors and internet facility, these devices sense the environment, understand, and then respond accordingly. Each object which is deployed underwater can be accessed virtually that helps to get information like physical properties and historical information about the object. Due to the ubiquitous nature of the information, it can be accessed or managed in real-time through many different ways of communication like Human to Thing (H2T) and Thing to Thing (T2T).
This book chapter gives us brief introduction about the IoUT and organized as follows. Section 12.2 familiarizes us with definite characteristics of the IoUT. Following, Section 12.3 proposed IoUT architecture that is explained from technical aspect. Section 12.4 discusses about the different challenges in IoUT. After this, application scenarios are described in Section 12.5. Later, in Section 12.6, there is discussion about the new evolving technology machine learning (ML) and how this ML is helpful in study or analyses of underwater environment. Simulation comparison of three different localization techniques in IoUT is presented in Section 12.7. Section 12.8 is the conclusion of the chapter.
Communication Technology: Radio and electronic waves do not work properly so acoustic waves are used for underwater communication. Radio waves does not propagate well below the water, and for using electronic magnetic waves, large-sized antennas are required and these waves gets attenuated with distance so acoustic waves are preferred in comparison of these waves.
Battery Power: Battery power is limited for underwater sensor nodes as it is difficult to charge these nodes or replace them. The need of batteries can be eliminated by using supercapacitors with ambient energy harvesting. This technique eliminates the need of batteries [11].
Network Density: A large number of devices communicate with each other in IoT for the proper functioning but it is very difficult in case of IoUT. As a smaller number of interconnecting digital devices are used in IoUT because deployment of devices is very tough in underwater. Localization Technique: In IoT, Global Positioning System (GPS) is used to find the location of devices but GPS does not work below the water so there exist different localization techniques categorized into range free and range based [12].
The proposed architecture of IoUT is very simple, as shown in Figure 12.2. It is a three-layer system architecture. Basic functionalities of these layers can be explained as follows.
Different devices like underwater vehicles, underwater sensors, surface stations, data storage tags, surface station, monitoring devices, and acoustic or pit or radio tags and receivers’ tags all these in collection form this layer. This layer detects the objects for data collection and collects the information from them.
Different components of this layer are explained below:
AUVs and Sensors: These AUVS and underwater sensors deployed below the water communicate with each other and collect the information for the particular application. This collected information is further passed on to the surface station above the sea surface. From this surface station, information is communicated to the onshore station for monitoring purpose.
Acoustic Tag: This is a compact sound-producing device that is injected into fish body by some surgery. This tag transmits a ping at a particular rate to sensors after a regular interval, that is further passed on to the sink. A unique digital ID is assigned to each fish. These tags are used to trace the location and movement of fish and analyze their behavior.
Radio Tag: Radio-frequency signals are transmitted by these tags. In seawater, radio waves can work properly. Boats (above the water surface) detect a radio-frequency signal transmitted by radio tags. In seawater, the electric conductivity is much higher than in freshwater owing to high salinity and radio tags converted to less efficient in high conductive water. In freshwater, anyhow, the controlled range (about 10 m), EM waves (contrasting to acoustic waves) are accepting to disturbance created by tidal surfs and suspended deposits, resistant to acoustic noise, and unaffected by pressure gradients. Thus, collective acoustic radio tags are an excellent selection to track object departing among both salt and freshwater. This case occurs when a fish migrate to and from different environments.
Pit Tag: A tag, transceiver, and an antenna collectively make this pit tag. An alphanumeric cipher is attached to each pit tag. This is a very compact tag and do not have any effect on the fish’s growth, health, and behavior. These tags remain functional for fish’s lifetime because PIT tags are passive in nature
Data Storage Tag: For collecting temperature, time, depth, and salinity data, these data storage tags are attached to fish in both ways externally and internally. During monitoring of data, loggers attached to computers can be used for data extraction and analysis [3].
Wireless or wired private networks, cloud computing platforms and inter-net, etc., that use different network technologies called heterogeneous network collectively make network layer. Information collected from the perceptron layer is processed and transmitted using the network layer. The information gathered from the perceptron layer allows the access of sink over the sea surface. After this, using various technologies like satellite communication, General Packet Radio Service (GPRS), and Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA), this information is retransmitted to the onshore centers [13].
To please the users, this layer applies IoUT technology so this layer provides set of intelligent solutions [14]. Different types of servers are used in this layer which host and execute the many type of services, e.g., acoustic server, RFID server, and monitoring server. Acoustic server gets data from diverse hydrophones, and this help in tracking the fish, their survival rate, etc., for fish identification and finding the associated information radio servers access the information from PIT tag. To transmit the sensed data to professionals, monitoring servers propose application codes like Ajax.
The research in IoUT is slow because of the unique behavior of UWSN and so many challenges are associated with this IoUT which are explained below:
Transmission Media: In TWSN for communication, use of radio waves is found to be very helpful. But UWSN mainly depends on the communication based on acoustic rather than communication done by radio. Acoustic communication does not absorb quickly in water, but in the case of radio communication, they are very quickly absorbed in water. Therefore, the properties of both the communication are quite different, and hence, the properties of TWSN cannot be applied directly to the UWSN. Hence, the medium of transmission is one of the major challenges for the IoUT [4, 15].
Propagation Speed: The speed of propagation in UWSN is 200,000 slower than that of TWSN. In TWSN, speed of propagation of the radio channels is 300,000,000 m/s, but, as compared to UWSN which is around 1,500 m/s, that is quite slow as compared to TWSN. This raises a challenge which is called end-to-end delay and can be a challenging task for the IoUT [4].
Transmission Range: The transmission range in UWSN is 10 times longer as compared to TWSN. Environment under deep water to decrease the absorption level of signals by water the transmission has to be done at a low frequency level as if the frequency is low the transmission range is long. Due to this long transmission, there might some difficulties of interference and collision, and data packets may be loss due to that. Therefore, it is quite important to tackle these collisions and interferences that may be the one of the challenges for the IoUT [4].
Latency: As acoustic waves are used for communication in IoUT and this is thousand time slower in comparison of terrestrial IoT networks. So, real-time communication is restricted due to this low speed in IoUT. Though, the study on the growth of optical modems is still in the academic research phase [15].
Network Life: Underwater communication in IoUT is entirely depend upon the sensor communication which are battery operated. Strict environment below the water do not allow these batteries to be recharge so this affects the network life time [15].
Self-Management: This is one of the biggest challenges as network in IoUT have to manage all network operation itself without any human intervention [5].
For last years, several researchers have proposed the various types of applications in IoUT, as shown in Figure 12.3. All the application [16] has been categorized into basic five types: (1) monitoring the environment, (2) prevention of disaster, (3) military, (4) exploring underwater, and (5) others.
Monitoring the Environment: Environment monitoring is the furthermost communal IoUT application that is used. This type of application is useful to monitor numerous parameters like quality of water, monitoring the temperatures, monitoring [17] thermal pollution, and monitoring pollution from various biological and chemical compounds. In addition, UWSN helps in monitoring of gas and oil [18]. It has been noted that the application of environmental monitoring has become more popular especially in demand for smart cities.
Underwater Exploration: The IoUT, new approach can be used to discover lost-treasure beneath the water. It has also noticed that, in 1985, the titanic discovery is being benefited from the usage of AUVs [25]. Further, IoUT can also be used in fish tracking. Moreover, discovery of natural resources in water like metals, coral reefs, and corals can be benefited from the UWSN infrastructure [26] as well.
Disaster Prevention: Disaster prevention applications that saved thousands of precious lives are one of the most principal IoUT applications
[30]. Natural calamities, especially water-based are actually threatening. For instance, the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster in Japan was commenced fundamentally by the tsunami following the Tohoku earthquake. IoUT is the best weapon to detect and predict flood, tsunami and earthquake [31].
Military: The defence forces do regular exercises to protect the motherland from external as well as natural threats. Underwater discoveries and monitoring scheme is also most important for military purposes. These apps have a tremendous capability for [35] further marine troops.
Some Other Applications: Owing to the latest research and innovation in this domain, IoUT, nowadays, is playing a niche role in many applications such as localization applications, navigation, and sports. Especially, the localization application as GPS is not applicable for marine surveillance environment [39] that provides a valuable location to ships, underwater vehicles, divers, and swimmers that can be provided by using underwater sensors as location allusion points [40].
ML subset of artificial intelligence is widely used spectrum and used in many application areas. Based on data, ML is able to take decisions. Nowadays, ML can be used in different areas; it also helps us in oceanography or underwater activities. Different applications that include ML in oceanography are habitat monitoring, prediction of ocean weather and climate, coastal water monitoring, species identification, detection of oil spill and pollution, and marine resources management. Several real-world problems are solved by ML itself because of its capability. Oceans are gigantic, complex, and dynamic in nature. So, ocean data structure is increasingly becoming large and complex. Coastal area is also exposed to many natural calamities like coastal flooding and sea level rise. To avoid these calamities, an accurate and reliable tool is required that helps in forecasting seashore evolution. Traditional methods were costly and time consuming and sometime these methods are not helpful in analysis, so ML can be used. ML outperforms traditional methods as this is fast, high precise, and robust.
ML helps in many application areas mentioned above in IoUT. Neural network can be used to predict the sea level waves and surface temperature. Pollution monitoring can be done with the help of ML. MLP NN model was used by Del Frate et al. to detect oil spill on sea surface from synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images. Many types of species exist below the water and identification of these species is tough task. ML helps us in identification of these species. ML algorithms are trained for this identification using images, videos, and other type of data. These trained algorithms can interpret data and identify the different type of species exist in water. For management of underwater activities, habitat monitoring is required [46]. Algorithms in ML can be trained to find the matching variables, and using this algorithm, it is easy to identify appropriate habitat for particular species at any location. Meteorological forecasting can be performed using genetic algorithms in ML which helps in modeling rainy vs. non-rainy days. Sea level pressure can also be predicted with this MLP NN model. This ML can help in many application areas and can improve IoUT research in future by making use of precise models. Appropriateness of data set used for training plays a big role in success of ML technique. Quality, preciseness, and amount of data are critical components for the success of these ML applications [47].
In this section, performance analysis of different localization techniques Cluster-Based Mobile Data Gathering Scheme (CMDG), Diffusion Logarithm Correntropy Algorithm (DLCA), and Large-Scale Hierarchical Localization (LSHL) has been compared in IoUT based on two quality of service parameters: energy and average communication cost, as these both should be minimum for a good localization technique. Figure 12.4 shows the average communication cost of three different localization techniques with node mobility effects.
Figure 12.5 shows the energy consumption in each of the three techniques with respect to number of sensor nodes.
From these two parameters, we conclude that CMDG perform better from other two techniques. In communication cost, it performs 17% better than DLCA and 24% better than LSHL. In terms of energy, CMDG performs 14% better than DLCA and 19% better than LSHL.
This chapter familiarized with different basic technological concepts of IoUT. For the development of practical IoUT network, IoUT architecture is explained in detail. Few important challenges are also summarized here. IoUT behavior will results in establishment of this technology. Also, in end of the chapter, ML concepts were discussed and how this ML helps in many applications for underwater environment. Diverse methods exist in ML that can be useful for oceanographic applications that totally depends upon the data. Quality of oceanographic research can be improved by developing new accurate models in ML, and this will help in discovering unseen forms and learnings.
1. Badotra, S. and Panda, S.N., A review on software-defined networking enabled iot cloud computing. IIUM Eng. J., 20, 2, 105–126, 2019.
2. Kumar, S., Tiwari, P., Zymbler, M., Internet of Things is a revolutionary approach for future technology enhancement: a review. J. Big Data, 6, 1, 1–21, 2019.
3. Datta, P. and Sharma, B., A survey on IoT architectures, protocols, security and smart city-based applications, in: 2017 8th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), 2017, July, IEEE, pp. 1–5.
4. Kao, C.C., Lin, Y.S., Wu, G.D., Huang, C.J., A comprehensive study on the internet of underwater things: applications, challenges, and channel models. Sensors, 17, 7, 1477, 2017.
5. Domingo, M.C., An overview of the internet of underwater things. J. Netw. Comput. Appl., 35, 6, 1879–1890, 2012.
6. Zhao, Q., Peng, Z., Hong, X., A named data networking architecture implementation to Internet of Underwater Things, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Underwater Networks & Systems, 2019, October, pp. 1–8.
7. Cui, J.H., Kong, J., Gerla, M., Zhou, S., The challenges of building mobile underwater wireless networks for aquatic applications. IEEE Network, 20, 3, 12–18, 2006.
8. Goyal, N., Architectural Analysis of Wireless Sensor Network and Underwater Wireless Sensor Network with Issues and Challenges. J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci., 17, 6, 2706–2712, 2020.
9. Gupta, O., Kumar, M., Mushtaq, A., Goyal, N., Localization Schemes and Its Challenges in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci., 17, 6, 2750–2754, 2020.
10. Gupta, O., Goyal, N., Anand, D., Kadry, S., Nam, Y., Singh, A., Underwater networked wireless sensor data collection for computational intelligence techniques: issues, challenges, and approaches. IEEE Access, 8, 122959–122974, 2020.
11. Choudhary, M. and Goyal, N., Routing protocol design issues and challenges in underwater wireless sensor network, in: Energy-Efficient Underwater Wireless Communications and Networking, pp. 1–15, IGI Global, US, 2021.
12. Nain, M. and Goyal, N., Localization Techniques in Underwater Wireless Sensor Network, in: 2021 International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE), 2021, March, IEEE, pp. 747–751.
13. Borgia, E., The Internet of Things vision: Key features, applications and open issues. Comput. Commun., 54, 1–31, 2014.
14. Gomez, C. and Paradells, J., Wireless home automation networks: A survey of architectures and technologies. IEEE Commun. Mag., 48, 6, 92–101, 2010.
15. Khalil, R., Babar, M., Jan, T., Saeed, N., Towards the Internet of underwater things: Recent developments and future challenges. IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag., 1964, 1–11, 2020.
16. Luo, X., Wang, J., Dooner, M., Clarke, J., Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation. Appl. Energy, 137, 511–536, 2015.
17. Conti, M.E. and Cecchetti, G., Biological monitoring: lichens as bioindicators of air pollution assessment—a review. Environ. Pollut., 114, 3, 471–492, 2001.
18. Felemban, E., Shaikh, F.K., Qureshi, U.M., Sheikh, A.A., Qaisar, S.B., Underwater sensor network applications: A comprehensive survey. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw., 11, 11, 896832, 2015.
19. Goyal, N., Dave, M., Verma, A.K., Data aggregation in underwater wireless sensor network: Recent approaches and issues. J. King Saud Univ.-Comput. Inf. Sci., 31, 3, 275–286, 2019.
20. Vasilescu, I., Kotay, K., Rus, D., Dunbabin, M., Corke, P., Data collection, storage, and retrieval with an underwater sensor network, in: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, 2005, November, pp. 154–165.
21. Casari, P. and Zorzi, M., Protocol design issues in underwater acoustic networks. Comput. Commun., 34, 17, 2013–2025, 2011.
22. Bandyopadhyay, D. and Sen, J., Internet of things: Applications and challenges in technology and standardization. Wirel. Pers. Commun., 58, 1, 49–69, 2011.
23. Owojaiye, G. and Sun, Y., Focal design issues affecting the deployment of wireless sensor networks for pipeline monitoring. Ad Hoc Networks, 11, 3, 1237–1253, 2013.
24. Akyildiz, I.F., Pompili, D., Melodia, T., Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 3, 3, 257–279, 2005.
25. Catsambis, A., Ford, B., Hamilton, D.L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of maritime archaeology, Oxford University Press, United State of America, 2014.
26. Davis, A., PEWSN: Power Equilibrium Wireless Sensor Network, Doctoral dissertation, Tufts University, Massachusetts, 2013.
27. Srinivas, S., Ranjitha, P., Ramya, R., Narendra, G.K., Investigation of oceanic environment using large-scale UWSN and UANETs, in: 2012 8th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2012, September, IEEE, pp. 1–5.
28. Ropert-Coudert, Y. and Wilson, R.P., Trends and perspectives in animal-attached remote sensing. Front. Ecol. Environ., 3, 8, 437–444, 2005.
29. Goyal, N., Dave, M., Verma, A.K., Protocol stack of underwater wireless sensor network: classical approaches and new trends. Wirel. Pers. Commun., 104, 3, 995–1022, 2019.
30. Akyildiz, I.F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Cayirci, E., A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Commun. Mag., 40, 8, 102–114, 2002.
31. Murphy, R.R., Tadokoro, S., Kleiner, A., Disaster robotics, in: Springer Handbook of Robotics, pp. 1577–1604, Springer, Cham, 2016.
32. Marin-Perez, R., García-Pintado, J., Gómez, A.S., A real-time measurement system for long-life flood monitoring and warning applications. Sensors, 12, 4, 4213–4236, 2012.
33. Kao, C.C., Lin, Y.S., Wu, G.D., Huang, C.J., A comprehensive study on the internet of underwater things: applications, challenges, and channel models. Sensors, 17, 7, 1477, 2017.
34. Eliasson, J., Low-power design methodologies for embedded internet systems, Doctoral dissertation, Luleå tekniska universitet, Sweden, 2008.
35. Becker, R.F., Nordby, S.H., Jon, J., Underwater forensic investigation, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2013.
36. Hedley, J.D., Roelfsema, C.M., Chollett, I., Harborne, A.R., Heron, S.F., Weeks, S., Ticzon, V., Remote sensing of coral reefs for monitoring and management: a review. Remote Sens., 8, 2, 118, 2016.
37. Pallayil, V., Chitre, M.A., Deshpande, P.D., A digital thin line towed array for small autonomous underwater platforms, in: OCEANS 2007, pp. 1–9, IEEE, 2007.
38. Lloret, J., Underwater sensor nodes and networks, Sensors, 13, 9, 11782–11796, 2013.
39. Goyal, N., Dave, M., Verma, A.K., SAPDA: secure authentication with protected data aggregation scheme for improving QoS in scalable and survivable UWSNs. Wirel. Pers. Commun., 113, 1–15, 2020.
40. De Bruyn, B., Whale Song in Submarine Fiction, in: the Novel and the Multispecies Soundscape, pp. 219–260, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2020.
41. Seedhouse, E., Tourists in space: A practical guide, Springer Science & Business Media, UK, 2008.
42. Southwest Georgia, R.K.W., Brown, I., Mai, N., Schlueter, M.A., Porphyrin, N., Adeyemo, A., Moomaw, W., friday paper presentations*. denotes student presenter** denotes student research in progress.
43. Borengasser, M., Hungate, W.S., Watkins, R., Hyperspectral remote sensing: principles and applications, CRC press, UK, 2007.
44. Liu, Z., Gao, H., Wang, W., Chang, S., Chen, J., Color filtering localization for three-dimensional underwater acoustic sensor networks. Sensors, 15, 3, 6009–6032, 2015.
45. El-Rabaie, S., Nabil, D., Mahmoud, R., Alsharqawy, M.A., Underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSN), architecture, routing protocols, simulation and modeling tools, localization, security issues and some novel trends. Netw. Commun. Eng., 7, 8, 335–354, 2015.
46. Ahmad, H., Machine learning applications in oceanography. Aquat. Res., 2, 3, 161–169, 2019.
47. Goyal, N., Sandhu, J.K., Verma, L., Machine learning based data agglomeration in underwater wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Manage. Technol. Eng., 9, 6, 240–245, 2019.