This chapter discusses the kinematics of a continuum. The reader is first introduced to the fundamental concepts of body, configuration, and motion, with the motion taking the body from its reference configuration to its present configuration. Special attention is devoted to developing the Lagrangian (referential) and Eulerian (spatial) descriptions of a quantity and showing that they are nothing more than labels: in the Lagrangian description, each particle is labeled by its position in the reference configuration, whereas in the Eulerian description, each particle is labeled by its position in the present configuration. The material derivative is introduced, from which fundamental definitions of velocity and acceleration follow. Finally, various deformation and strain measures are introduced and their physical meanings interpreted.
A body B is a set of particles. A representative particle is designated as Y, where Y is the name of the particle (e.g., Steve, Bob, or the color red); see Figure 3.1(a). Body B is seen only in its configurations. A configuration of B is the region of E3 (Euclidean 3-space) occupied at a particular instant by the body.
Consider the configuration of body B at time t, called the present configuration, in which B occupies an open volume R of E3 bounded by a closed surface ∂R; see Figure 3.1(b). (If, for instance, the body B is an orange, the region occupied by the flesh constitutes an open volume, and the region occupied the peel constitutes a closed surface.) Let x be the position vector of the place occupied by the representative particle Y at time t; see Figure 3.1(b). Then
x=ˉχ(Y,t).
The mapping (3.1) is called the motion of body B. Note that we distinguish the function ˉχ(Y,t) from its value (or output) x. The mapping ˉχ is assumed to be differentiable as many times as necessary with respect to both Y and t. We also make the important assumption that the motion (3.1) is invertible for each t, so the function exists.
Y=ˉχ−1(x,t)
One particular configuration κ of body B may be selected as the reference configuration, and then the body and its motion may be referred to this fixed configuration. A common practice is to choose κ to be the initial configuration, i.e., the configuration occupied by B at time t = 0. However, the reference configuration need not be the initial configuration; in fact, it can even be a configuration that the body B never actually attains. Since the selection of the reference configuration κ is taken from an infinite number of possible configurations of B, a motion has infinitely many different referential descriptions, all equally valid.
In the reference configuration κ, the body B occupies an open volume RR of E3 bounded by a closed surface ∂RR; see Figure 3.1(c). Let X be the position vector of the place occupied by the representative particle Y in this reference configuration.The mapping from Y to X is written
X=κ(Y).
The mapping (3.3), called the reference map, is assumed to be differentiable as many times as desired, and invertible. The inverse mapping is
Y=κ−1(X).
Using (3.4), we can rewrite the motion (3.1) as
x=ˉχ[κ−1(X),t]=χκ(X,t).
Equation (3.5) serves as a definition of the mapping κχ. It should be noted that κχ depends on the choice of reference configuration κ. If only one reference configuration is adopted, then the subscript κ is generally omitted, i.e.,
x=χ(X,t),
and the dependence of χ on a particular reference configuration κ is understood.
The function (3.1) is called the material description of motion. In the material description, we deal directly with the particle Y of B. The description of motion (3.6) is called the referential description of motion. In the referential description, the particle Y of B is labeled by the position X it occupied when B was in its reference configuration κ.
The displacement u of the particle Y is defined as the difference between its reference and present positions, i.e.,
u=x−X;
see Figure 3.2.
Consider a vector quantity f related to the motion of body B. (Our use of a vector quantity is arbitrary; the discussion that follows is equally valid for a scalar quantity φ or a tensor quantity A.) In the material description, the quantity f is expressed as a function of particle Y and time t, i.e.,
f=ˉf(Y,t).
In the referential description, f is expressed as a function of the position X occupied by Y in the reference configuration κ, and time t. To see this we use (3.4) in (3.8):
f=ˉf(Y,t)=ˉf(κ−1(X),t)=ˆf(X,t).
The quantity f may also be expressed as a function of the position x occupied at time t by the particle Y, and time t. To see this we use (3.2) in (3.8):
f=ˉf(Y,t)=ˉf(ˉχ−1(x,t),t)=ˆf(x,t).
In (3.10) we have expressed f in terms of the present position x of Y, and time t. Such a description is called the spatial description. Referential and spatial descriptions are also referred to as Lagrangian and Eulerian descriptions, respectively.
To review: A vector quantity f (or a scalar quantity φ or a tensor quantity A) related to the motion of body B may be expressed in any of three different descriptions:
f=ˉf(Y,t)(material)=ˆf(X,t)(referential)=˜f(x,t)(spatial).
This freedom is due to our assumptions that the mappings (3.1) and (3.3) are invertible. In the referential description, each particle is labeled by its reference position; in the spatial description, each particle is labeled by its present position. We note that the material description is seldom used in continuum mechanics since it becomes intractable to find a different name for each particle in the body; the other two representations, however, are useful and will be employed.
Consider once again a vector quantity f related to the motion of body B. The material derivative of f, denoted by ˙f, is defined as the partial derivative of the material description (3.8) of f with respect to time t, holding the label Y fixed:
˙f=∂∂tˉf(Y,t).
The quantity ˙f can be described as the time rate change of f following a particle. It follows that the velocity v and acceleration a of the particle Y are defined by
v=˙x=∂∂tˉχ(Y,t),a=˙v=∂∂tˉv(Y,t)=∂2∂t2ˉχ(Y,t).
We now determine the referential and spatial descriptions of the material derivative ˙f, which was defined in its impractical material description in (3.11). Using (3.3), (3.9), (3.11), and the chain rule (2.95), we have
˙f=∂∂tˉf(Y,t)=∂∂tˆf(X,t)+∂∂Xˆf(X,t)∂X∂t=∂∂tˆf(X,t)+∂∂Xˆf(X,t)∂∂tκ(Y)=∂∂tˆf(X,t).
Therefore, in the referential description, ˙f is
˙f=∂∂tˆf(X,t),
so the referential forms of the velocity v and acceleration a are
v=˙x=∂∂tχ(X,t),a=˙v=∂∂tˆv(X,t)=∂2∂t2χ(X,t).
These forms give the velocity and acceleration at time t of a particle Y that occupied position X in the reference configuration.
To obtain the spatial description of ˙f, we use (3.1), (3.10), (3.11), (3.12), and the chain rule (2.95):
˙f=∂∂tˉf(Y,t)=∂∂t˜f(x,t)+∂∂x˜f(x,t)∂x∂t=∂∂t˜f(x,t)+∂∂x˜f(x,t)∂∂tˉχ(Y,t)=∂∂t˜f(x,t)+∂∂x˜f(x,t)v.
Therefore, the spatial description of ˙f is
˙f=∂∂t˜f(x,t)+∂∂x˜f(x,t)v,
so the spatial form of the acceleration a is
a=˙v=∂∂t˜v(x,t)+∂∂x˜v(x,t)v.
This form gives the acceleration at time t of a particle Y that occupies position x at time t.
Similarly, for a scalar quantity φ, we have material, referential, and spatial descriptions of the material derivative:
˙φ=∂∂tˉφ(Y,t),˙φ=∂∂tˆφ(X,t),˙φ=∂∂t˜φ(x,t)+∂∂x˜φ(x,t)·v,
and, for a tensor quantity A,
˙A=∂∂tˉA(Y,t),˙A=∂∂tˆA(X,t),˙A=∂∂t˜A(x,t)+∂∂x˜A(x,t)v.
For a scalar-, vector-, or tensor-valued function of position and time associated with the motion of body B, there are four possible partial derivatives, depending on if the function is considered in its referential form or its spatial form:
˙φ=∂∂tˆφ(X,t),φ′=∂∂t˜φ(x,t),Gradφ=∂∂Xˆφ(X,t),gradφ=∂∂x˜φ(x,t),˙f=∂∂tˆf(X,t),f′=∂∂t˜f(x,t),Gradf=∂∂Xˆf(X,t),gradf=∂∂x˜f(x,t),˙A=∂∂tˆA(X,t),A′=∂∂t˜A(x,t),GradA=∂∂XˆA(X,t),gradA=∂∂x˜A(x,t).
We employ this notation throughout the remainder of the book. In words, ˙f denotes the partial derivative of the referential description of f with respect to time (this is a restatement of (3.13)); f′ denotes the partial derivative of the spatial description of f with respect to time; Grad f denotes the gradient of the referential description of f; and grad f denotes the gradient of the spatial description of f. Also, Div f and div f are the divergence of f when considered in its referential and spatial descriptions, respectively. With use of the notation introduced in (3.19), the spatial forms of ˙φ, ˙f, and ˙A (refer to (3.15), (3.17)3, and (3.18)3) become
˙φ=φ′+gradφ·v,˙f=f′+(gradf)v,˙A=A′+(gradA)v.
Note that to relate the operations Grad and grad, we have, for instance,
Gradφ=FTgradφ,Gradf=(gradf)F,
where F = Grad x = ∂x/∂X is called the deformation gradient (there is more on this in Section 3.3).
The following forms of the product rule can be verified:
·¯φf=˙φf+φ˙f,·¯f·g=˙f·g+f·˙g,·¯f×g=˙f×g+f×˙g,·¯Af=˙Af+A˙f,·¯AB=˙AB+A˙B,·¯A·B=˙A·B+A·˙B,
where φ is a scalar, f and g are vectors, and A and B are tensors. We also have
·¯A+B=˙A+˙B,·¯AT=(˙A)T.
1. In Cartesian component notation, verify the following forms of the product rule:
(b) ·¯f·g=˙f·g+f·˙g.
(c) ·¯f×g=˙f×g+f×˙g.
(d) ·¯Af=˙Af+A˙f.
(e) ·¯AB=˙AB+A˙B.
(f) ·¯A·B=˙A·B+A·˙B.
2. In Cartesian component notation, verify that ·¯A+B=˙A+˙B.
3. Prove in direct notation that ·¯AT=(˙A)T.
A fundamental postulate of classical continuum mechanics is that the response at a particle of the continuum to a deformation at a particular time depends only on the deformation of a small neighborhood of the particle up to that time. We will therefore devote a sizeable amount of space to (1) defining what is meant by the small neighborhood of a particle, (2) defining what is meat by deformation, and (3) describing the kinematical quantities that characterize deformation.
The small neighborhood of a particle Y consists of particle Y and all of its nearest neighbors. Suppose Y occupies position X in the reference configuration RR and position x in the present configuration R; refer to Figure 3.1. A vector dX is a filament of infinitesimal length dS in the reference configuration, radiating from X in the direction along unit vector N:
dX=NdS.
The line element dX connects particle Y to one of its nearest neighbors in the reference configuration; see Figure 3.4. The small neighborhood of particle Y in the reference configuration RR is the set of all dXs radiating from position X.
The motion x = χ (X, t) is defined for all particles in the body, i.e., for all X in RR. During this motion, the line element dX will be deformed—in general stretched (or compressed) and rotated, but not bent (dX is too short to be bent)—into a line element dx of length ds, radiating from the new position x of particle Y in the direction along unit vector n:
dx=nds;
see Figure 3.4. Recall from Section 3.1 that the motion x = χ (X, t) of the body maps each particle Y from its reference position X to its present position x. Since the motion is defined for all particles in the body, the deformation, or change in local geometry, of the small neighborhood of particle Y can be found by evaluating the function χ (X, t) on the particle and all of its nearest neighbors. However, a more tractable approach to quantifying the deformation of this small neighborhood involves defining a deformation measure that can be evaluated at Y alone, so the need to track the motion of all of the nearest neighbors of Y is obviated. This is accomplished through the use of a Taylor series.
A Taylor series is a mathematical tool that expresses the value of a function at one point in terms of the value of the function and its derivatives at another point. Suppose two particles that occupy points 1X and 2X in the reference configuration are mapped to points 1x and 2x in the present configuration (see Figure 3.5). A Taylor series expansion at 1X gives
2x=χ(2X,t)=χ(1X,t)+[∂χ∂X(1X,t)](2X−1X)+12[∂2χ∂X2(1X,t)](2X−1X)⊗(2X−1X)+…
If 1X and 2X are nearest neighbors, then the higher-order terms are negligible, leaving
2x=1x+[∂χ∂X(1X,t)](2X−1X).
Upon replacing 1X with X, 2X−1X with dX, and 2x−1x with dx, we have
dx=[∂χ∂X(X,t)]dX.
We label
F≡∂χ(X,t)∂X=Gradχ=Gradx,
so
dx=FdX,
where F is called the deformation gradient.
Using definition (3.28), one can verify that F satisfies requirements (2.7) and is thus a tensor. Hence, F linearly maps each line element dX radiating from X in the reference configuration into a line element dx radiating from x in the present configuration. (dX is not bent when it is mapped by F to dx.) Therefore F describes the mapping of the small neighborhood of X to the small neighborhood of x, and thus quantifies the changes in the relative positions of nearest neighbors in the body; see Figure 3.6. In other words, F, a function evaluated only at the point X, is a measure of the deformation, or change of local geometry, in the neighborhood of X as it moves to x.
Since F is a linear map, if the small neighborhood of X in the reference configuration is a sphere, then the deformation maps it into an ellipsoid in the present configuration; see Figure 3.6. (If a spherical volume in the reference configuration deforms into a shape other than an ellipsoid, then it is too large to qualify as a small neighborhood, thereby invalidating our truncation of the series (3.26).) Note that although F is a tensor, which is by definition a linear map, the deformation is not restricted to be “linear,” in the sense of infinitesimal. The stretch and rotation of the map from dX to dx can be large.
The tensor F, in general, is a function of position and time, i.e.,
F=ˆF(X,t)=˜F(x,t).
If F is independent of position, i.e., F = F(t), the deformation is said to be homogeneous. If F is independent of time, i.e., F=ˆF(X)=˜F(x), the deformation is said to be static.
1. Prove that the deformation gradient F is a tensor.
The deformation gradient F contains the knowledge of what happens, both stretch and rotation, to all elements dX radiating from X in the reference configuration, as they deform to dx in the present configuration at time t. It is worthwhile separating the two concepts of stretch and rotation, which are combined in F, since, as we shall see in later sections, sometimes only one or the other is physically important. We now produce functions of F that isolate stretch or rotation. We will also identify particular elements dX and dx, of the infinitely many radiating from X and x, which have special significance in understanding the deformation.
In general, the line element dX undergoes both stretch and rotation in the deformation (3.28). The ratio
dsdS=λ
of the length of dx to the length of dX is called the stretch λ of the line element. Note that λ is always positive and
λ>1⇒the line element lengthens,λ<1⇒the line element shortens,λ=1⇒the length of the line element remains the same.
Suppose we are interested only in the stretch, and not the rotation, that will happen to a particular line element dX along direction N. Using (3.24) and (3.25), we can rewrite (3.28) as
nds=FNdS,
or, using the definition of stretch (3.30),
λn=FN.
By taking the inner product of (3.32) with itself, we can show that (refer to Problem 3.3)
λ2=N·CN=C·(N⊗N),
where
C=FTF
is called Green's deformation tensor (or the right Cauchy-Green deformation tensor). It can be shown (refer to Problem 3.4) that C is symmetric and positive definite. From relation (3.33), we see that C contains information about the stretch, and not the rotation, that will happen to a line element dX along direction N in the reference configuration.
Suppose instead we are interested only in the stretch, and not the rotation, that has happened to a particular dx along direction n in the present configuration. Recall that we assumed in Section 3.1 that the motion x=ˉχ(Y,t) is invertible for all particles Y and times t. Then, using (3.2) and (3.3), we obtain
X=κ(Y)=κ(ˉχ−1(x,t))=χ−1(x,t),
so the motion x = χ (X, t) is invertible. From linear algebra, it follows that
J≡detF=det(∂x∂X)≠0.
We refer to J ≡ det F as the Jacobian of the deformation gradient, which, as we will see later, is related to the local dilatation or volume change. Inequality (3.36) implies that the tensor F−1 exists, i.e., F = Grad x is invertible:
dX=F−1dx.
Using (3.24) and (3.25), we can rewrite (3.37) as
NdS=F−1nds,
or
1λN=F−1n.
By taking the inner product of (3.38) with itself, we can show that
1λ2=n·cn=c·(n⊗n),
where
c=F−TF−1
is called the Cauchy deformation tensor. It can be verified that c is symmetric and positive definite. From relation (3.39), we see that c contains information about the stretch, and not the rotation, that has happened to a line element dx along direction n in the present configuration.
Therefore, in summary, to find the stretch of a line element without concern for its rotation, if one has knowledge of the shape of the reference configuration (e.g., a specimen in a tensile test), use (3.33), and if one has knowledge of the shape of the deformed configuration (e.g., an inflated inner tube or beach ball), use (3.39).
1. Prove in direct notation that 1λ2=n·cn=c·(n⊗n).
2. Prove in direct notation that the Cauchy deformation tensor c is symmetric and positive definite.
We return to our discussion of the deformation gradient F. Since F is invertible (see (3.37)), it can be decomposed using the polar decomposition theorem (refer to Section 2.3) into the form
F=RU
or
F=VR,
where R is an orthogonal tensor (it will be shown in Sections 3.6 and 4.12 that det F > 0, so R is in fact proper orthogonal), and U and V are symmetric, positive-definite tensors. For physical reasons to be revealed shortly, the tensors R, U, and V are called the rotation tensor, right stretch tensor, and left stretch tensor, respectively.
The effect of the multiplicative decompositions (3.41a) and (3.41b) is to replace the linear transformation (3.28) by either of two pairs of linear transformations:
dx=FdX=(RU)dX=R(UdX),
i.e.,
dX*=UdXfollowed bydx=RdX*,
or
dx=FdX=(VR)dX=V(RdX),
i.e.,
dX*=RdXfollowed bydx=Vdx*;
see Figure 3.7. We emphasize that (3.42a) and (3.42b) involve sequential (or serial) mappings, a distinguishing feature of multiplicative decompositions. Physically, it can be shown that (3.42a) represents stretch followed by pure rotation (refer to Problem 3.6), while (3.42b) represents pure rotation followed by stretch (refer to Problem 3.7).
Recall the sequential mappings (3.42a) and (3.42b) that arise as a result of the polar decomposition of F, and refer to Figure 3.7. We showed in Problems 3.6 and 3.7 that the maps dx* = R dX and dx = R dX* are pure rotations since they involve no length change. The maps dX* = U dX and dx = V dx*, on the other hand, are called stretches since they incorporate all of the length change of the line element, from length dS of dX to length ds = λdS of dx. In general, these latter two maps also involve a change of direction (or rotation), in addition to this stretch.
When dX is in certain directions, however, the deformation (3.42a)1 from dX to dX* = U dX is pure stretch, i.e., dX* is parallel to dX. Similarly, when dx* = R dX is in certain directions, the deformation (3.42b)2 from dx* to dx = V dx* is pure stretch, i.e., dx is parallel to dx*.
Recall the map dX* = U dX, where U is the right stretch tensor. The condition that a particular element d1X along direction 1N undergoes pure stretch in the map U is
d1X*=Ud1X=1λd1X,
or, equivalently,
U1N=1λ1N.
Therefore, if d1X is along a direction 1N that undergoes pure stretch in the map U, then it is along an eigenvector of U, in which case the direction 1N is an eigenvector of U, and the stretch 1λ that d1X undergoes is an eigenvalue of U (refer to Section 2.3).
Since U is symmetric and positive definite, there always exist at least three mutually perpendicular eigenvectors 1N, 2N, 3N of U, with corresponding positive eigenvalues 1λ, 2λ, 3λ. Therefore, there exist at least three directions of pure stretch in the map U, which we will label 1N, 2N, 3N, with corresponding stretches 1λ, 2λ, 3λ. We call 1N, 2N, 3N the principal directions, and 1λ, 2λ, 3λ the principal stretches. These three mutually perpendicular unit vectors 1N, 2N, 3N in the directions of pure stretch form an orthonormal basis. With respect to this basis, the matrix of tensor U is diagonal, with components equal to the principal stretches:
U=1λ1N⊗1N+2λ2N⊗2N+3λ3N⊗3N=3∑i=1iλiN⊗iN.
Again, refer to Section 2.3.
With this understanding of the principal directions (directions of pure stretch) and principal stretches of U, we can now give the following description of the deformation dx = FdX, as decomposed into dx = R(UdX):
Suppose the small neighborhood of X is a sphere of radius dS. The deformation F takes this sphere into an ellipsoid (see Figure 3.6). In the decomposition F = RU, the sphere is first stretched into an ellipsoid; in this deformation there are (at least) three line elements d1X, d2X, d3X become the principal axes 1λd1X, 2λd2X, 3λd3X of the ellipsoid (see Figure 3.8). The rotation R then rigidly rotates this ellipsoid, so 1N (the direction of d1X ) rotates to 1n, 2N rotates to 2n, and 3N rotates to 3n . Since R is a rigid rotation, 1n, 2n, 3n is an orthonormal basis for E3 . Therefore,
R=1n⊗1N+2n⊗2N+3n⊗3N=3∑i=1in⊗iN.
The final product of the composition of these two maps is an ellipsoid with principal axes
d1x=1λ1ndS,d2x=2λ2ndS,d3x=3λ3ndS.
Suppose d1X is along a direction of pure stretch in U, i.e., d1X is along an eigenvector of U. Then,
d1x=Fd1X=R(Ud1X)=R(1λd1X)=1λ(Rd1X).
We also have
d1x=Fd1X=V(Rd1X).
Thus,
V(Rd1X)=1λ(Rd1X),
so d1x*=Rd1X is along an eigenvector of the left stretch tensor V. As such, the deformation V takes Rd1X to 1λRd1X, so it stretches without rotating. Therefore, the rotation R rotates the principal stretch directions 1N, 2N, 3N of U into the principal stretch directions 1n, 2n, 3n of V; see Figure 3.8. Furthermore, the principal stretches 1λ, 2λ, 3λ of V are the principal stretches 1λ, 2λ, 3λ of U. Hence, V can be expressed as
V=1λ1n⊗1n+2λ2n⊗2n+3λ3n⊗3n=3∑i=1iλin⊗in.
We can now give the following description of the deformation dx = F dX, as decomposed into dx = V(R dX):
Suppose the small neighborhood of X is a sphere of radius dS. The deformation F takes this sphere into an ellipsoid (see Figure 3.6). In the decomposition F = VR, the sphere is first rotated rigidly, and is then stretched into the final ellipsoid. The initial rotation is such that the final stretch is accomplished without any change of direction in the principal axes of the ellipsoid; see Figure 3.8.
Note that R is a rigid rotation of the small neighborhood of X, not of the body as a whole; R can be a function of position, so different parts of the body rotate different amounts.
Recall Green's deformation tensor
C=FTF
and the Cauchy deformation tensor
c=F−TF−1,
which were defined in Section 3.3.2. Also recall that
C=FTF=(RU)T(RU)=UTRTRU=UTIU=UTU=UU≡U2.
We now define
B=FFT,
called the Finger deformation tensor (or the left Cauchy-Green deformation tensor). It can be shown that
B=VV≡V2.
Also, we can verify that
cB=Bc=I,
so
B=c−1.
Suppose 1N is an eigenvector of U, with corresponding eigenvalue 1λ. Then
C1N=UU1N=U(1λ1N)=1λU1N=(1λ)21N.
Therefore, the eigenvectors of C are the eigenvectors of U, and the eigenvalues of C are the squares of the principal stretches. It follows that
C=(1λ)21N⊗1N+(2λ)22N⊗2N+(3λ)23N⊗3N=3∑i=1(iλ)2iN⊗iN.
Similarly, it can be shown that V and B have the same eigenvectors 1n, 2n, 3n, and that the eigenvalues of B are the squares of the principal stretches, so
B=(1λ)21n⊗1n+(2λ)22n⊗2n+(3λ)23n⊗3n=3∑i=1(iλ)2in⊗in.
All of the measures of deformation we have so far defined, namely, F, F−1, C, c, B, R, U, and V, reduce to the identity tensor in the absence of deformation:
x=X⇒F=F−1=C=c=B=R=U=V=I.
We now define two additional measures,
E=12(C−I),
called the Lagrangian strain tensor (or Green-Lagrange strain tensor), and
e=12(I−c),
called the Eulerian strain tensor (or Euler-Almansi strain tensor). These strain tensors vanish in the absence of deformation:
x=X⇒E=e=0.
Recall that C, c, U, and V are symmetric; it can be shown that B, E, and e are also symmetric.
The deformation and strain tensors presented heretofore can be expressed in terms of the displacement u = x − X. For instance, we have
C=(Gradx)TGradx=[Grad(X+u)]TGrad(X+u)=(I+Gradu)T(I+Gradu)=I+Gradu+(Gradu)T+(Gradu)TGradu
and
E=12(C−I)=12[Gradu+(Gradu)T+(Gradu)TGradu].
Similarly,
c=I−gradu−(gradu)T+(gradu)Tgradu
and
e=12(I−c)=12[gradu+(gradu)T−(gradu)Tgradu].
Equations (3.54) and (3.55) are referred to as strain-displacement relations.